, Volume 67, Issue 3, pp 407–418 | Cite as

The science network in Italian population research: An analysis according to the social network perspective



The scientific community organises its relationships into network patterns, where the nodes are individuals (scientists) and the links are acquaintance and common work, usually presented at workshops and conferences and/or published in books and scientific journals. A references review on Population Studies by Italian scientists is delivered every two years by the Demography Section of the Italian Statistical Society; the review is exhaustive for academic demographers. In this paper, the properties of the demographers’ network in 1998–1999 are evaluated, with the aim of identifying factors which may influence collaborative relations among actors. The probability of cooperation between couples (dyads) of demographers is modelled, conditionally on observed characteristics of the dyad (sex, academic position, university affiliation). Main results suggest that “closeness”, defined in a wider sense and not simply as geographical proximity, plays a major role in determining actors’ relationships.


Academic Position Collaboration Pattern Exponential Random Graph Model Demography Section Social Network Perspective 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Batagelj, V., Mrvar, A. (2001), Pajek (Version 0.70) — Program for Large Network Analysis, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia.Google Scholar
  2. Carolyn, J. A., Wasserman, S., Crouch, B. (1999), A p* primer: logit models for social networks, Social Networks, 21: 37–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Farahat, H. (2002), Authorship patterns in agricultural sciences in Egypt, Scientometrics, 55(2): 157–170.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Koku, E., Nazer, N., Wellman, B. (2001), Netting scholars: online and offline, American Behavioral Scientist, 44: 1750–1772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Liang, L., Guo, Y., Davis, M. (2002), Collaborative patterns and age structures in Chinese publications, Scientometrics, 54(3): 473–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Liberman, S., Wolf, K. B. (1997), The flow of knowledge: scientific contacts in formal meetings, Social Networks, 19: 271–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Melin, G., Persson, O. (1996), Studying research collaboration using co-authorship, Scientometrics, 36(3): 363–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Nagpaul, P. S. (2002), Visualizing cooperation networks of elite institutions in India, Scientometrics, 54(2) 213–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Newman, M. E. J. (2003), Ego-centered networks and the ripple effect, Social Networks, 25: 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Rivellini, G., Rizzi, E. (2002), Science network in Italian population research: an application of social network analysis, Atti della XLI Riunione Scientifica, Società Italiana di Statistica, CLEUP, Padova: pp. 215–218.Google Scholar
  11. Snijders, T. A. B. (2001), The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics, In: M. E. Sobel, M. P. Becker (Eds), Sociological Methodology, Boston and London, Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  12. Snijders, T. A. B. (2002), Markov Chain Monte Carlo estimation of exponential random graph models, Journal of Social Structure, 3: 2.Google Scholar
  13. Wasserman, S., Pattison, P. (1996), Logit models and logistic regression for social networks: I. An introduction to Markov graphs and p*, Psychometrika, 61: 401–426.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giulia Rivellini
    • 1
  • Ester Rizzi
    • 1
  • Susanna Zaccarin
    • 2
  1. 1.Università Cattolica del Sacro CuoreMilanoItaly
  2. 2.University of TriesteTriesteItaly

Personalised recommendations