Abstract
It is widely reported that the productivity-richness relation (PRR) is highly variable, and several field studies suggest that the PRR varies with observational scale. Here we provide the first experimental study to test whether the PRR is scale-dependent when all replicate ecosystems have similar initial conditions. We also test the relation between productivity and compositional dissimilarity, and whether the PRR varies with ecosystem size. Moderately complex replicated microcosms were assembled consisting of a range of protozoa, algae, and a diverse bacterial flora. We found that the PRR of protozoan and algal communities varied with observational scale, but was unrelated to ecosystem size. Specifically, protozoan and algal richness increased monotonically with productivity at the local scale, but became flattened at the regional scale. This varying PRR at different scales occurred because dissimilarity among replicates decreased with productivity. Thus, in this model system, our experimental approach found a different form of scale dependence than previous field research. We speculate that this difference results from different processes governing extinctions at low levels of productivity.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrams, P.A. 1995. Monotonic or unimodal diversity-productivity gradients: what does competition theory predict? Ecology 76: 2019–2027.
Brown, J.H. 1973. Species diversity of seed-eating desert rodents in sand dune habitats. Ecology 54: 775–787.
Chalcraft, D.R., J.W. Williams, M.D. Smith and M.R. Willig. 2004. Scale dependence in the speices-richness-productivity relationship: the role of species turnover. Ecology 85: 2701–2708.
Chase, J.M. and M.A. Leibold. 2002. Spatial scale dictates the productivity-biodiversity relationship. Nature 416: 427–430.
Chase, J.M. and W.A. Ryberg. 2004. Connectivity, scale-dependence, and the productivity-diversity relationship. Ecol. Lett. 7: 676–683.
Crawley, M.J. 2002. Statistical Computing: An Introduction to Data Analysis using S-Plus. Wiley, New York.
Drake, J.A. 1991. Community assembly mechanics and the structure of an experimental species ensemble. Am. Nat. 137: 1–26.
Fukami, T. and P.J. Morin. 2003. Productivity-biodiversity relationships depend on the history of community assembly. Nature 424: 423–426.
Fukami, T. 2004. Assembly history interacts with ecosystem size to influence species diversity. Ecology 85: 3234–3242.
Gross, K.L., M.R. Willig, L. Gough, R. Inouye and S.B. Cox. 2000. Patterns of species density and productivity at different spatial scales in herbaceous plant communities. Oikos 89: 417–427.
Hall, S.J., S.A. Gray and Z.L. Hammett. 2000. Biodiversity-productivity relationships: an experimental evaluation of mechanisms. Oecologia 122: 545–555.
Hulot, F.D., P.J. Morin and M. Loreau. 2001. Interactions between algae and the microbial loop in experimental microcosms. Oikos 95:231–238.
Huston, M.A. 1994. Biological Diversity: The Coexistence of Species on Changing Landscapes. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
Jiang, L. and P.J. Morin. 2004. Productivity gradients cause positive diversity-invasibility relationships in microbial communities. Ecol. Lett. 7: 1047–1057.
Kaspari, M., S. O’Donnell and J.R. Kercher. 2000. Energy, density, and constraints to species richness: ant assemblages along a productivity gradient. Am. Nat. 155: 280–293.
Kassen, R., A. Buckling, G. Bell and P.B. Rainey. 2000. Diversity peaks at intermediate productivity in a laboratory microcosm. Nature 406: 508–512.
Kondoh, M. 2001. Unifying the relationships of species richness to productivity and disturbance. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268: 269–271.
Lande, R. 1993. Risks of population extinction from demographic and environmental stochasticity and random catastrophes. Am. Nat. 142: 911–927.
Law, R. and D. Morton. 1993. Alternative permanent states of ecological communities. Ecology 74: 1347–1361.
Luh, H.K. and S.L. Pimm. 1993. The assembly of ecological communities: a minimalist approach. J. Anim. Ecol. 62: 749–765.
McCann, K. S. et al. 2005. The dynamics of spatially coupled food webs. Ecol. Lett. 8: 513–523.
Mittelbach, G.G., C.F. Steiner, S.M. Scheiner, K.L. Gross, H.L. Reynolds, R.B. Waide, M.R. Willing, S.I. Dondson and L. Gough. 2001. What is the observed relationship between species richness and productivity? Ecology 82: 2381–2396.
Price, J.E. and P.J. Morin. 2004. Colonization history determines alternate community states in a food web of intraguild predators. Ecology 85: 1017–1028.
R Development Core Team. 2008. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
Reed, D.H., J.J. O’Grady, B.W. Brook, J.D. Ballou and R. Frank-ham. 2003. Estimates of minimum viable population size for vertebrates and factors influencing those estimates. Biol. Con-serv. 113: 23–34.
Rosenzweig, M.L. and P.A. Abramsky. 1993. How are diversity and productivity related? In: Ricklefs, R. and D. Schluter (eds.), Species Diversity in Ecological Communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. pp. 52–65.
Srivastava, D.S. and J.H. Lawton. 1998. Why more productive sites have more species: an experimental test of theory using tree-hole communities. Am. Nat. 152: 510–529.
Stevens, M.H.H. and W.P. Carson. 2002. Resource quantity, not resource heterogeneity, controls diversity. Ecol. Lett. 5: 420–426.
Thompson, R.M. and C.R. Townsend. 2005. Food-web topology varies with spatial scale in a patchy environment. Ecology 86: 1916–1925.
Waide, R.B., M.R. Willing, C.F. Steiner, G.G. Mittelbach, L. Gough, S.I. Dodson, G.P. Juday and R. Parmenter. 1999. The relationship between productivity and species richness. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30: 257–300.
Wright, D.H. 1983. Species-energy theory, an extension of species-area theory. Oikos 41: 496–506.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, W., Stevens, M.H.H. High community dissimilarity at low productivity causes the productivity-richness relation to vary with observational scale. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 11, 27–34 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.11.2010.1.5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.11.2010.1.5