Abstract
Our paper presents the general overview of the current geophysical results, which helps to improve the geophysical image and the lithospheric structure of the Carpathian-Pannonian Basin region. Two different geophysical methods have been applied for the study of the structure and composition of the lithosphere as well as for determination of the lithospheric thermal structure. Firstly, integrated 2D modeling of gravity, geoid, topography and surface heat flow data was performed. Secondly, based on the results of the CELEBRATION 2000 seismic experiment, a large-scale 3D lithospheric gravity model was developed. The resulting map of the lithospheric thickness shows important variations in lithospheric thickness across the chain as well as along strike of the Carpathian arc. The sediment stripped gravity map is characterized by minima in the Eastern Alps and Western Carpathians. The maxima are observed in the Pannonian Back-arc Basin system, Bohemian Massif, Fore-Sudetic Monocline, Bruno-Silesian unit (BSU), Lublin Trough and partly in the Holy Cross Mts. and Malopolska unit. The Western Carpathian gravity minimum is a result of the interference of two main gravity effects. The first one comes from the low-density sediments of the Outer Western Carpathians and Carpathian Foredeep. The second one is due to the thick low-density upper and middle crust, reaching up to 25 km. The sediment stripped anomaly in the Pannonian Back-arc Basin system is characterized by gravity high that is a result of the gravity effect of the anomalously shallow Moho. The most dominant feature of the complete stripped gravity map is the abrupt change of the positive anomalies along the Pieniny Klippen Belt zone. The complete residual anomaly of the Pannonian Back-arc Basin system and the Western Carpathian orogen is characterized by a long-wavelength gravity low. The lowest values are associated with the thick low-density upper and middle crust of the Inner Western Carpathians. The European Platform is characterized by significantly denser crust with respect to the less dense crust of the microplates ALCAPA and Tisza-Dacia. That is why we suggest that the European platform represents consolidated, while the Carpathian-Pannonian Basin region un-consolidated crust.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ádám A 1978: Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 17, 21–28.
Ádám A 1996: Acta Geod. Geoph. Hung., 31, 191–216.
Ádám A, Wesztergom V 2001: Acta Geol. Hung., 44, 167–192.
Ádám A, Novák A, Szarka L 2005: Acta Geod. Geoph. Hung., 40, 317–348.
Afonso J C 2006: Thermal, density, seismological, and rheological structure of the lithospheric-sublithospheric mantle from combined petrological-geophysical modeling: Insights on lithospheric stability and the initiation of subduction. PhD thesis, Carleton University, Ottawa
Afonso J C, Fernandez M, Ranalli G, Griffin W, Connolly J 2008: Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 9, Q05008.
Alasonati Tašárová Z, Bielik M, Götze H-J 2008: Geologica Carpathica, 59, 199–209.
Alasonati Tašárová Z, Afonso, J C, Bielik M, Götze H-J, Hók J 2009: The lithospheric structure of the Western Carpathian-Pannonian Basin region based on the CELEBRATION 2000 seismic experiment and gravity modeling. Tectonophysics, 475, 454–469.
Babuška V, Plomerová J, Pajdušák P 1988: In: 4th EGT Workshop: The Upper Mantle, Comm. of the Eur. Commun., Eur. Sci. Found., Utrecht, Netherlands
Balla Z 1994: Geologica Carpathica, 45, 271–281.
Bielik M, Šefara J, Kováč M, Bezák V, Plašienka D 2004: Tectonophysics, 393, 63–86.
Bielik M, Kloska K, Meurers B, Švancara J, Wybraniec S, CELEBRATION 2000 Potential Field Working Group 2006: Geologica Carpathica, 57, No. 3, 145–156.
Čermák V, Král M, Kubík M, Šafanda J, Krešl J, Kuferová M, Jančí L, Lizoň J, Marušiak I, 1992: In: Geothermal Atlas of Europe, E Hurtig, V Čermák eds, 21–24.
Christensen N I, Mooney W D 1995: J. Geophys. Res., 100(B7), 9761–9788.
Csontos L 1995: Acta Vulcanol., 7, 1–13.
Csontos L, Nagymarosy A, Horváth F, Kováč M 1992: Tectonophysics, 208, 221–241.
Dérerová J, Zeyen H, Bielik M, Salman K 2006: Tectonics, 25, (TC3009).
Gesch D B, Verdin K L, Greenlee S K 1999: Eos Trans. AGU, 80, 69–70.
Gordienko V V, Zavgorodnyaya O V 1996: Acta Geophys. Pol., 44, 173–180.
Götze H-J, Lahmeyer B 1988: Geophysics, Vol. 53, No. 8, 1096–1108.
Grad M, Guterch A, Keller G R, Janik T, Hegedüs E, Vozár J, Slaczka A, Tiira T, Yliniemi J 2006: J. Geophys. Res., 111, B03301.
Haas J ed. 2001: Geology of Hungary. Eötvös University Press, Budapest
Hók J, Bielik M, Kováč P, Šujan M 2000: Mineralia Slovaca (in Slovakian), 32,5, 459–470.
Horváth F 1993: Tectonophysics, 226, 333–357.
Horváth F, Bada G, Szafian P, Tari G, Ádám A, Cloetingh S 2006: European Lithosphere Dinamics. In: G D Gee, R A Stephenson eds, Geological Society London, Memoirs 32, 191–206.
Hrubcová P, Šroda P, Špičák A, Guterch A, Grad M, Keller G R, Brückl E, Thybo H 2005: J. Geophys. Res., 110, B11305.
Janik T, Grad M, Guterch A, Dadlez R, Yliniemi J, Tiira T, Keller G R, Gaczynski E, CELEBRATION 2000 Working Group 2005: Tectonophysics, 411, 129–156.
Kázmér M, Kovács S 1985: Acta Geol. Hung., 28(1–2), 71–84.
Konečný V, Kováč M, Lexa J, Šefara J 2002: Neogene evolution of the Carpatho-Pannonian region: an interplay of subduction and back-arc diapiric uprise in the mantle. EGU Stephan Mueller Special Publication Series 1, 165–194.
Kováč M 2000: Geodynamic, palaeographic and structural evolution of the Carpathian-Pannonian region in Miocene (in Slovakian). VEDA, Bratislava, Slovakia, 5–202.
Král M 1995: In: Atlas of geothermal energy of Slovakia. O Franko, A Remšík, M Fendek eds, GéDŠ, Bratislava, Slovakia
Labák P, Brouček I 1996: Catalogue of macroseismically observed earthquakes on the territory of Slovakia (Version 1996). Manuscript, Geophys. Inst. Slov. Acad. Sci., Bratislava
Lemoine F G, et al. 1998: The development of the Joint NASA GSFC and NIMA geopotential model EGM96. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md.
Lenkey L 1999: Geothermics of the Pannonian Basin and its bearing on the tectonics of basin evolution. PhD thesis, Free University, Amsterdam
Lexa J, Konečný V, Kalinčiak M, Hojstričová V 1993: In: Konf., Symp., Sem., GéDŠ, Bratislava, 57–69.
Lillie R J, Bielik M, Babuška V, Plomerová J 1994: Tectonophyics, 231, 215–235.
Majorowicz J A 2004: Geol. Quaternally, 48, 1–13.
Malinowski M, Zelazniewicz A, Grad M, Guterch A, Janik T 2005: Tectonophysics, 401, 55–77.
Pollack H N, Hurter S J, Johnson J R 1993: Rev. Geophys., 31, 267–280.
Posgay K 1975: Geophysical Transactions, 23, 13–18.
Ratschbacher L, Merle O, Davy P, Cobbold P 1991a: Tectonics, 10, 245–256.
Ratschbacher L, Frisch W, Linzer H G, Merle O 1991b: Tectonics, 10, 257–271.
Sandwell D T, Smith W H F 1997: J. Geophys. Res., 102,10, 039–10,054.
áSchmidt S, Götze H-J 1999: Phys. Chem. Earth, (A) 24(3), 191–196.
Šefara J, Bielik M, Konečný P, Bezák V, Hurai V 1996: Geol. Carpathica, 47, 339–347.
Semenov V Yu, Pek J, Ádám A, Józwiak W, Ladanyvskyy B, Logvinov I M, Pushkarev P, Vozár I 2008: Acta Geophysica, 56, 957–981.
Sobolev S V, Babeyko A Y 1994: Surveys Geophys., 15(5), 515–544.
Środa P, Czuba W, Grad M, Guterch A, Tokarski A K, Janik T, Rauch M, Keller G R, Hegedüs E, Vozár J, Celebration 2000 Working Group 2006: Geoph. J. Int., 167, 737–760.
Szabó C, Falus G, Zajacz Z, Kovács I, Bali E 2004: Tectonophysics, 393, 119–137.
Tomek and PANCARDI Colleagues 1996: In: Origin and Evolution of Continents. D G Gee, H J Zeyen eds, EUROPROBE Secr., Uppsala, 15–23.
Wortel M J R, Spakman W 2000: Science, 290, 1910–1917.
Zeyen H, Fernàndez M 1994: J. Geophys. Res., 99, 18089–18102.
Zeyen H, Dérerová J, Bielik M 2002: Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 134, 89–104.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bielik, M., Alasonati-Tašárová, Z., Zeyen, H. et al. Improved geophysical image of the Carpathian-Pannonian Basin region. Acta Geod. Geoph. Hung 45, 284–298 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1556/AGeod.45.2010.3.3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/AGeod.45.2010.3.3