Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Earthquake prediction: basics, achievements, perspectives

  • Published:
Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica Hungarica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The recent scientific advances in understanding the hierarchical nature of the lithosphere and its dynamics based on systematic monitoring and evidence of its space-energy similarity at global, regional, and local scales did result the design of reproducible intermediate-term middle-range earthquake prediction technique. The real-time experimental testing aimed at prediction of the largest earthquakes worldwide from 1992 to the present proved statistically a possibility of practical earthquake forecasting although of limited precision. In the first approximation, an accuracy of 1–5 years and 5–10 times the anticipated source dimension is achieved. Further analysis of seismic dynamics allows reducing the spatial uncertainty down to 1–3 source dimensions, although at the cost of additional failures-to-predict. Despite of limited accuracy a considerable damage could be prevented by timely knowledgeable use of the existing predictions and earthquake prediction strategies. The link of theoretical research in modeling earthquake sequences in frames of statistical physics on the one hand and instrumental and algorithm developments on the other hand help developing a new generation of earthquake prediction technique of higher accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen C R, Edwards W, Hall W J, Knopoff L, Raleigh C B, Savit C H, Toksoz M N, Turner R H 1976: Predicting earthquakes: A scientific and technical evaluation — with implications for society. Panel on Earthquake Prediction of the Committee on Seismology, Assembly of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, National Research Council, U.S. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bak P, Christensen K, Danon L, Scanlon T 2002: Phys. Rev. Lett., 88, 178501–178504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barenblatt G I 1982: Similarity, Selfsimilarity, and Intermediate Asymptotics. Consultants Bureau, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Barenblatt G 1996: Scaling, Self-Similarity, and Intermediate Asymptotics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatia S C, Chalam S V, Gaur V K, Keilis-Borok V I, Kossobokov V G 1989: Proc. Indian Ac. Sci.. Earth and Planetary Sciences, 98, 111–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corral A 2003:. Phys. Rev. E, 68, 035102(R).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellsworth W L, Beroza G C 1995: Science, 268, 851–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans E, Bhatti N, Kinney J, Pann L, Pena M, Yang S-C, Hansen J, Kalnay E 2003: RISE undergraduates find that regime changes in Lorenz’s model are predictable. (Accepted in Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc.)

  • Frohlich C, Davis S D 1993: J. Geophys. Res., 98, 631–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabrielov A, Newman W I, Turcotte D L 1999: Phys. Rev. E, 60, 5293–5300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gahalaut V K, Kuznetsov I V, Kossobokov V G, Gabrielov A M, Keilis-Borok V I 1992: Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Earth Planet. Sci.), 101, 239–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geller R J, Jackson D D, Kagan Y Y, Mulargia F 1997: Science, 275, 1616–1619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Global Hypocenters Data Base CD-ROM 1989: NEIC/USGS, Denver, CO. and its PDE and QED updates

  • Gorshkov A, Kossobokov V, Soloviev A 2003: In: Nonlinear Dynamics of the Lithosphere and Earthquake Prediction. V I Keilis-Borok, A A Soloviev eds, Springer, Heidelberg, 141–207.

  • Gutenberg B, Richter C F 1954: Seismicity of the Earth. 2nd ed., Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris R A 1998: Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 88, 898–916.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harte D, Li D-F, Vreede M, Vere-Jones D 2003:. New Zealand Journal of Geology, Geophysics, 46, 141–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healy J H, Kossobokov V G, Dewey J W 1992: A test to evaluate the earthquake prediction algorithm, M8, U.S. Geol. Surv. Open-File Report 92–401, with 6 Appendices

  • Kagan Y, Jackson D 2000: Geophys. J. Int., 143, 438–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanamori H, Brodsky E H 2001: The Physics of earthquakes. Physics Today, June 2001, 34–40.

  • Keilis-Borok V I 1990: Rev. Geophys., 28, 19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keilis-Borok V I, Kossobokov V G 1984: In: Proc. 27th Geological congress, 61, Moscow, Nauka, 56–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keilis-Borok V I, Kossobokov V G 1987: Periods of high probability of occurrence of the world’s strongest earthquakes, Computational Seismology 19, Allerton Press Inc., 45–53.

  • Keilis-Borok V I, Kossobokov V G 1990a: J. Geophys. Res., 95, 12413–12422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keilis-Borok V I, Kossobokov V G 1990b: Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 61, 73–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keilis-Borok V I, Rotwain I M 1990: Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 61, 57–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keilis-Borok V I, Knopoff L, Rotwain I M, Allen C R 1988: Nature, 335, 690–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keilis-Borok V I, Knopoff L, Kossobokov V G, Rotvain I M 1990: Geophys. Res. Letters, 17, 1461–1464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kossobokov V G 1997: In: Algorithms for earthquake statistics and prediction. J H Healy, V I Keilis-Borok, W H K Lee eds, IASPEI Software Library, Vol. 6. Seismol. Soc. Am., El Cerrito, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kossobokov V G 2003: In: IUGG2003, Sapporo, Japan. Abstracts, Week A, A.184.

  • Kossobokov V G, Khokhlov A V 1993: An experimental intermediate-term prediction of earthquakes in real time: Verification of the M8 algorithm. Mathematical modeling of seismotectonic processes in the lithosphere oriented on the problem of earthquake prediction (in Russian), Issue 1. Moscow: MITP RAN, 53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kossobokov V G, Mazhkenov S A 1988: Spatial characteristics of similarity for earthquake sequences: Fractality of seismicity. Lecture Notes of the Workshop on Global Geophysical Informatics with Applications to Research in Earthquake Prediction and Reduction of Seismic Risk, ICTP, Trieste

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosobokov V G, Mazhkenov S A 1994: In: Computational Seismology and Geodynamics. D K Chowdhury ed., Am. Geophys. Un., 1, Washington, D.C., The Union, 6–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kossobokov V P, Shebalin 2003: In: Nonlinear Dynamics of the Lithosphere and Earthquake Prediction. V I Keilis-Borok, A A Soloviev eds, Springer, Heidelberg, 141–207.

  • Kossobokov V G, Rastogi B K, Gaur V K 1989: Proc. Indian Ac. Sci. Earth and Planetary Sciences, 98, 309–318..

    Google Scholar 

  • Kossobokov V G, Keilis-Borok V I, Smith S W 1990: J. Geophys. Res., 95, 19763–19772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kossobokov V G, Healy J H, Keilis-Borok V I, Dewey J W, Khokhlov A V 1992: Testing an intermediate-term earthquake prediction algorithm: A real-time test design and the results of retrospection (in Russian). Doklady RAN, 325,1, 46–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kossobokov V G, Keilis-Borok V I, Romashkova L L, Healy J H 1999: Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 111, 187–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kossobokov V G, Keilis-Borok V I, Cheng B 2000: Earth. Phys. Rev. E, 61, 3529–3533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latoussakis J, Kossobokov V G 1990: Pure Appl. Geophys., 134, 261–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lay T, Wallace T C 1995: Modern global seismology. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz E N 1963: J. Atmos. Sci., 20, 130–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molchan G M 1997: Pure Appl. Geophys., 149, 233–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molchan G M 2003: In: Nonlinear Dynamics of the Lithosphere and Earthquake Prediction. V I Keilis-Borok, A A Soloviev eds, Springer, Heidelberg, 141–207.

  • Nature Debates 1999: http://www.nature.com/nature/debates/earthquake/equake_frameset.html

  • Nekrasova A, Kossobokov V 2002: Generalizing the Gutenberg-Richter scaling law. EOS Trans. AGU, 83(47), Fall Meet. Suppl., Abstract NG62B-0958.

  • Nekrasova A, Kossobokov V 2003: Generalized Gutenberg-Richter recurrence law: Global map of parameters. Geophysical Research Abstracts, 5, 2003. Abstracts of the Contributions of the EGS-AGU-EGU Joint Assembly, Nice, France, (CD-ROM): EAE03-A-03801.

  • Romachkova L L, Kossobokov V G, Panza G F, Costa G 1998: Pure and Appl. Geophys., 152, 37–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romashkova L L, Kossobokov V G 2001: Seismicity dynamics prior to and after the largest earthquakes worldwide, 1985–2000. In: Problems of lithosphere dynamics and seismicity (Computational seismology, 32) (in Russian), Moscow: GEOS, 162–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz C H 1997: Geotimes, 42(3), 16–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shebalin P N, Keilis-Borok V I 1999: Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 111, 215–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shebalin P, Zaliapin I, Keilis-Borok V 2000: Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 122, 241–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shebalin P N, Keilis-Borok V I, Zaliapin I, Uyeda S, Nagao T, Tsybin N 2003: In: IUGG2003, Sapporo, Japan. Abstracts, Week A, A.184.

  • Sykes L R, Shaw B E, Scholz C H 1999: Pure appl. Geophys., 155, 207–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turcotte D L 1995: Fractals and Chaos in Geophysics. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2nd edition, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vorobieva I A 1999: Physics Earth Planet. Inter., 111, 197–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyss M ed. 1991: Evaluation of Proposed Earthquake Precursors. AGU, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyss M 1997a: Science, 278, 487–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyss M 1997b: Pure Appl. Geophys., 149, 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaliapin I, Keilis-Borok V, Axen G 2002: J. Geophys. Res., 107(B10), 2221, doi: 10.1029/2000JB000034

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. International Institute of Earthquake Prediction Theory and Mathematical Geophysics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

    V. G. Kossobokov

  2. Russian Federation Institute de Physique du Globe de Paris, Paris, France

    V. G. Kossobokov

Authors
  1. V. G. Kossobokov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kossobokov, V.G. Earthquake prediction: basics, achievements, perspectives. Acta Geod. Geoph. Hung 39, 205–221 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1556/AGeod.39.2004.2-3.6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/AGeod.39.2004.2-3.6

Keywords

Search

Navigation