DNA Quantification to Assess Zymoseptoria tritici on a Susceptible Cultivar of Durum Wheat to Establish the Best Timing for Fungicide Application in an Italian Environment

Abstract

Zymoseptoria tritici, a globally distributed pathogen, is responsible of Septoria tritici blotch (STB), one of the most damaging wheat diseases. In Italy the incidence of STB has increased during the past few years. The presence of Z. tritici on flag leaves of susceptible durum wheat plants, cultivar San Carlo, after a single artificial inoculation with two inoculum concentrations at different vegetative stages has been evaluated in the plain of Bologna (North of Italy), in a two year field study (2012–2013). The pathogen presence was also assessed in natural infection conditions after a fungicide application in the second year (2013). The results obtained, by visual examination (Incidence, Disease Severity) and DNA quantification by Real time PCR, demonstrated that BBCH 39 (flag leaf stage) is the most susceptible vegetative stage, independently of inoculum concentration and climatic conditions. A good correlation between Disease Severity and DNA quantity was observed in either sampling methods, entire flag leaves and flag leaf discs. Thereafter the most suitable period to obtain the best crop protection with only one fungicide treatment is the flag leaf stage.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Alkadri, D., Nipoti, P., Döll, K., Karlovsky, P., Prodi, A., Pisi, A. 2013. Study of fungal colonization of wheat kernels in Syria with a focus on Fusarium species. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 14:5938–5951.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alvisi, G., Cristiani, C., Ponti, D., Betti, C., Ferrari, A. 2014. Grano duro: lotta alla septoriosi, quale strategia di difesa usare. Supplemento Informatore Agrario, “Cereali – difesa e nutrizione”, 9:20–23.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bronnimann, A. 1968. Investigations of Septoria nodorum Berk. of wheat. Mitt. Schveiz. Landwirt. 16:65–67.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dean, R., Van Kan, J.A., Pretorius, Z.A., Hammond-Kosack, K.E., Di Pietro, A., Spanu, P.D., Rudd, J.J., Dickman, M., Kahmann, R., Ellis, J. 2012. The Top 10 fungal pathogens in molecular plant pathology. Mol. Plant Path. 13:414–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fones, H., Gurr, S. 2015. The impact of Septoria tritici Blotch disease on wheat: An EU perspective. Fungal Gen. and Biol. 79:3–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fraaije, B., Lovell, D.J., Rohel, E.A., Hollomon D.W. 1999. Rapid detection and diagnosis of Septoria tritici epidemics in wheat using a polymerase chain reaction/Pico green assay. J. Appl. Microbiol. 86:701–708.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fraaije, B.A., Cools, H.J., Fountaine, J., Lovell, D.J., Motteram, J., West, J.S., Lucas, J.A. 2005. The role of ascospores in further spread of QoI-resistant cytochrome b alleles (G143A) in field populations of Mycosphaerella graminicola. Phytopathol. 95:933–941.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Goudemand, E., Laurent, V., Duchalais, L., Tabib Ghaffary, S.M., Kema, G.H.J., Lonnet, P., Margalé, E., Robert, O. 2013. Association mapping and meta-analysis: two complementary approaches for the detection of reliable Septoria tritici blotch quantitative resistance in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Mol. Breed. 32:563–584.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Guo, J.R., Schneider, F., Verreet, J.A. 2006. Presymptomatic and quantitative detection of Mycosphaerella graminicola development in wheat using Real Time PCR. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 262:223–229.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kema, G.H.J., Verstappen, E.C., Todorova, M., Waalwijk, C. 1996. Successful crosses and molecular tetrad and progeny analyses demonstrate heterothallism in Mycosphaerella graminicola. Curr. Genet. 30:251–258.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mirzadi Gohari, A., Ware, S.B., Wittenberg, A.H.J., Mehrabi, R., Ben M’Barek, S., Verstappen, E.C.P., van der Lee, T., Robert, O., Schouten, H., de Wit, P., Kema, G. 2015. Effector discovery in the fungal wheat pathogen Zymoseptoria tritici. Mol. Plant Path. 16:931–945.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. O’Driscoll, A.O., Kildea, S., Doohan, F., Spink, J., Mullins, E. 2014. The wheat–Septoria conflict: a new front opening up?. Trends Plant Sci. 19:602–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pasquini, M., Iori, A., Nocente, F., Sereni, L., Cacciatori, P., Cristofori, C., Caprara, F., Codianni, P., Licciardello, S., Martelli, M., Notario, T., Petrini, A., Podda, E., Randazzo, B., Viola, P. 2015. Sensibilità dei frumenti alle principali malattie fungine. L’informatore agrario 39:42–46.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shaw, M.W. 1987. Assessment of upward movement of rain splash using a florescent tracer method and its application to the epidemiology of cereal pathogens. Plant Pathol. 36:201–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shaw, M.W., Royle, D.J. 1993. Factors determining the severity of epidemics of Mycosphaerella graminicola (Septoria tritici) on winter wheat in the UK. Plant Pathol. 42:882–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Torriani, S.F.F., Brunner, P.C., McDonald, B.A., Sierotzki, H. 2009. QoI resistance emerged independently at east 4 times in European populations of Mycosphaerella graminicola. Pest Manag. Scie. 65:155–162.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Torriani, S., Melichar, J., Mills, C., Pain, N., Sierotzki, H. 2015. Zymoseptoria tritici: A major threat to wheat production, integrated approaches to control. Fungal Gen. and Biol. 79:8–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Prodi.

Additional information

Communicated by M. Taylor

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tonti, S., Alvisi, G., Pisi, A. et al. DNA Quantification to Assess Zymoseptoria tritici on a Susceptible Cultivar of Durum Wheat to Establish the Best Timing for Fungicide Application in an Italian Environment. CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS 47, 304–313 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1556/0806.47.2019.03

Download citation

Keywords

  • durum wheat
  • Zymoseptoria tritici
  • qPCR
  • fungicide