Advertisement

Community Ecology

, Volume 9, Supplement 1, pp 33–42 | Cite as

How is phenology of grassland species influenced by climate warming across a range of species richness?

  • C.M.H.M. LemmensEmail author
  • H.J. De Boeck
  • C. Zavalloni
  • I. Nijs
  • R. Ceulemans
Article

Abstract

We imposed two different global changes, climate warming and declining species richness, to synthesized grassland ecosystems, in order to determine both their single-factor effect as well as their possible interactions on plant phenology. Twelve climate-controlled chambers were therefore exposed to two temperature treatments (0 °C and 3 °C above ambient air temperature) and three species richness treatments (1, 3 and 9 species). Measurements consisted of visual phenological observations of the appearance of flower buds until flowering and of autumn senescence stages, as well as of readings of the leaf chlorophyll content. In spring, chlorophyll concentrations increased under warming (9.7%) and decreasing species richness (39.4%). Warming also induced an earlier spring start (4 days) and enhanced flower production, whereas decreasing species richness likewise enhanced flower production but delayed the start of spring (16 days). In autumn, leaf senescence started simultaneously at the two temperature treatments and three species richness levels, but the end of the senescence was delayed in the heated chambers, as well as in the monocultures. Although warming and species richness interacted with species identity, no warming×species richness interactions were found. In conclusion, although warming and species richness influenced the duration of the growing season, none of these effects were reflected in the above-ground biomass of the individual plants. Under the projected climatic changes, warming will therefore not necessarily enhance the productivity of the individual plants.

Keywords

Above-ground biomass Advanced spring Chlorophyll content index Postponed senescence Synthesized grassland ecosystems 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baskerville, G.L. and P. Emin. 1969. Rapid estimation of heat accumulation from maximum and minimum temperatures. Ecology 50:514–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ceulemans, R., A.S. Kowalski, P. Berbigier, A.J. Dolman, A. Grelle, I.A. Janssens, A. Lindroth, E. Moors, U. Rannik and T. Vesala. 2003. Coniferous Forests (Scots and Maritime Pine): Carbon and Water Fluxes, Balances, Ecological and Ecophysiological Determinants. In: R. Valentini (ed.), Fluxes of Carbon, Water and Energy of European Forests. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  3. Cleland, E.E., Chuine, I., Menzel, A., Mooney, H.A. and M.D. Schwartz. 2007. Shifting plant phenology in response to global change. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22:357–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. De Boeck, H.J., C.M.H.M. Lemmens, H. Bossuyt, S. Malchair, M. Carnol, R. Merckx, I. Nijs and R. Ceulemans. 2006. How do climate warming and plant species richness affect water use in experimental grasslands? Plant Soil 288:249–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Boeck, H.J., C.M.H.M. Lemmens, B. Gielen, H. Bossuyt, S. Malchair, M. Carnol, R. Merckx, R. Ceulemans and I. Nijs. 2007a. Combined effects of climate warming and plant diversity loss on above- and below-ground grassland productivity. Env. Exp. Bot. 60:95–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Boeck, H.J., C.M.H.M. Lemmens, S. Vicca, J. Van den Berge, S. Van Dongen, I.A. Janssens, R. Ceulemans and I. Nijs. 2007b. How do climate warming and species richness affect CO2 fluxes in experimental grasslands? New Phytol. 175:512–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dubé, P.A., L.P. Perry and M.T. Vittum. 1984. Instructions for Phenological Observations: Lilac and Honeysuckle. Vermont Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 692, University of Vermont, Burlington, USA.Google Scholar
  8. Fenner, M. 1998. The phenology of growth and reproduction in plants. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 1:78–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Field, A.P. 2000. Discovering Statistics using SPSS for Windows: Advanced Techniques for the Beginner. Sage, London, UK.Google Scholar
  10. Fridley, J.D. 2001. The influence of species diversity on ecosystem productivity: how, where and why? Oikos 93:514–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grant, S.A. 1968. Temperature and light factors limiting the growth of hill pasture species. British Grassland Society Occasional Symposium 4:30–34.Google Scholar
  12. Gulmon, S.L., N.R. Chiariello, H.A. Mooney and C.C. Chu. 1983. Phenology and resource use in three co-occurring grassland annuals. Oecologia 58:33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Herve, C. and R. Ceulemans. 1996. Short-rotation coppiced vs. non-coppiced poplar: a comparative study at two different field sites. Biomass Bioenerg. 11:139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hunter, D.A., S.D. Yoo, S.M. Butcher and M.T. McManus. 1999. Expression of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase during leaf ontogeny in white clover. Plant Physiol. 120:131–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. IPCC. 2007. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Summary for Policymakers. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  16. Jach, M.E., R. Ceulemans and M.B. Murray. 2001. Impacts of Greenhouse Gases on the Phenology of Forest Trees. In: D.F. Karnosky, R. Ceulemans, G.E. Scarascia-Mugnozza and J.L. Innes (eds.), The Impact of Carbon Dioxide and Other Greenhouse Gases on Forest Ecosystems, Wallingford, CABI.Google Scholar
  17. Kramer, K. 1994. A modelling analysis on the effects of climatic warming on the probability of spring frost damage to tree species in The Netherlands and Germany. Plant Cell Environ. 17:367–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kramer, K. 1995. Phenotypic plasticity of the phenology of seven European tree species, in relation to climatic warming. Plant Cell Environ. 18:93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lemmens, C.M.H.M., H.J. De Boeck, B.Gielen, H. Bossuyt, S. Malchair, M. Carnol, R. Merckx, I. Nijs and R. Ceulemans. 2006. End-of-season effects of elevated temperature on ecophysi-ological processes of grassland species at different species richness levels. Env. Exp. Bot. 56:245–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lieth, H. 1974. Phenology and Seasonality Modelling. SpringerVerlag, New York, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Malcorps, H. 2005. Year Report of 2005. Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium (KMI), Brussels, Belgium (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  22. Murray, M.B. and R. Ceulemans. 1998. Will Tree Foliage be Larger and Live Longer? In: P.G. Jarvis (ed.), European Forests and Global Change: the Likely Impact of Rising CO 2 and Temperature. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 94–125.Google Scholar
  23. Myneni, R.B., C.D. Keeling, C.J. Tucker, G. Asrar and R.R. Nemani. 1997. Increased plant growth in the northern high latitudes from 1981 to 1991. Nature 386:698–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Perfors, T., J. Harte and E. Alter. 2003. Enhanced growth of sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata) in response to manipulated ecosystem warming. Global Change Biol. 9:736–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pollock, C.J. 1990. The response of plants to temperature change. J. Agric. Sci. 115:1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Prakash, M. and K. Ramachandran. 2000. Effects of moisture stress and anti-transpirants on leaf chlorophyll, soluble protein and photosynthetic rate in Brinjal plants. J. Agronomy Crop Science 184:153–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schnelle, F. 1955. Pflanzen-Phänologie: Probleme der Bioklimatologie 3. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft Geest & Portig K.-G., Leipzig.Google Scholar
  28. Schwartz, M.D. 2003. Phenology: An Integrative Environmental Science. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Špunda, V., M. Marek, J. Kalina, R. Kuropatwa, I. Marková, M. Maœláò, M. Miklicová and J. Nauœ. 1994. Changes in the photosynthetic apparatus of juvenile spruce (Picea abies L. Karst) induced by the first frost under field conditions. Universitas Ostraviensis, Acta Facultatis Rerum Naturalium, Physica - Chemia 141:37–52.Google Scholar
  30. Thomas, C.D., A. Cameron, R.E. Green, M. Bakkenes, L.J. Beaumont, Y.C. Collingham, B.F.N. Erasmus, M.F. de Siqueira, A. Grainger, L. Hannah, L. Hughes, B. Huntley, A.S. van Jaarsveld, G.F. Midgley, L. Miles, M.A. Ortega-Huerta, A.T. Peterson, O.L. Phillips and S.E. Williams. 2004. Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427:145–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Van Peer, L., I. Nijs, D. Reheul and B. De Cauwer. 2004. Species richness and susceptibility to heat and drought extremes in synthesized grassland ecosystems: compositional vs. physiological effects. Funct. Ecol. 18:769–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vicca, S., P. Serrano-Ortiz, HJ. De Boeck, C.M.H.M. Lemmens, I. Nijs, R. Ceulemans, A.S. Kowalski and I.A. Janssens. 2007. Effects of climate warming and declining species richness in grassland model ecosystems: acclimation of CO2 fluxes. Biogeosciences 4:27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Walther, G.-R. 2003. Plants in a warmer world. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 6:169–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yoo, S.D., D.H. Greer, W.A. Laing and M.T. McManus. 2003. Changes in photosynthetic efficiency and carotenoid composition in leaves of white clover at different development stages. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 41:887–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhou, L., C.J. Tucker, R.K. Kaufmann, D. Slayback, N.V. Shabanov and R.B. Myneni. 2001. Variations in northern vegetation activity inferred from satellite data of vegetation index during 1981 to 1999. J. Geophys. Res. 106:20069–20083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2008

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • C.M.H.M. Lemmens
    • 1
    Email author
  • H.J. De Boeck
    • 1
  • C. Zavalloni
    • 1
  • I. Nijs
    • 1
  • R. Ceulemans
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Group of Plant and Vegetation Ecology, Department of BiologyUniversity of Antwerp (Campus Drie Eiken)Belgium

Personalised recommendations