Even if the establishment of nature reserves is to date a reality and the increase of protected areas is going to grow year after year, monitoring programs aiming to assess the effectiveness of the established protected areas for biodiversity conservation are still needed. That is the case for the Natura 2000 network in Europe, for which monitoring methods and programs are not yet well-established. A probabilistic sampling procedure is proposed and tested for quantifying and monitoring plant species diversity within a local network of protected areas, namely the Natura 2000 network in the Siena Province, Italy. On the basis of a sampling strategy of one 100 m plot randomly located in each 1 km x 1 km cell, four Sites of Community Importance (SCIs) were investigated in 2005. The gradients in species composition at the plot scale were largely related to elevation and forest cover. The species richness values of the four SCIs were compared by means of sample-based rarefaction curves. Then, additive partitioning of species richness was applied to determine the most important spatial components in determining the total species richness of the network. Compositional differences among the plots within each SCI were the most responsible of the total species richness. These methodologies can be adopted for assessing plant species richness within a large region or within a reserve network and, if combined with additive partitioning, they can be used as a set of large scale indicators of species diversity.
Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling
Site of Community Importance.
Allan, J.D. 1975. Components of diversity. Oecologia 18: 359–367.
Baffetta, F., G. Bacaro, L. Fattorini, D. Rocchini and A. Chiarucci. 2007. Multi-stage cluster sampling for estimating average species richness at different spatial grains. Community Ecol. 8: 119–127.
Bock, M., G. Rossner, M. Wissen, K. Remm, T. Langanke, S. Lang, H. Klug, T. Blaschke and B. Vrscaj. 2005. Spatial indicators for nature conservation from European to local scale. Ecol. Indic. 5: 322–338.
Chiarucci, A. 2007. To sample or not to sample? That is the question … for the vegetation scientist. Folia Geobot. 42: 209–216.
Chiarucci, A, G. Bacaro, D. Rocchini and L. Fattorini. 2008. Discovering and rediscovering the sample-based rarefaction formula in ecological literature. Community Ecol. 9: 121–123.
Chiarucci, A. and I. Bonini. 2005. Quantitative floristics as a tool for the assessment of plant diversity in Tuscan forests. Forest Ecol. Manage. 212: 160–170.
Chiarucci, A., V. De Dominicis and J. B.Wilson. 2001. Structure and floristic diversity in permanent monitoring plots in forest eco-systems of Tuscany. Forest Ecol. Manage. 141: 201–210.
Chiarucci A., N.J. Enright, G.L.W. Perry, B.P. Miller and B.B. Lamont. 2003. Performance of nonparametric species richness estimators in a high diversity plant community. Diver. Distrib. 9: 283–295.
Chytrý, M. and Z. Otýpková. 2003. Plot sizes used for phytosociological sampling of European vegetation. J. Veg. Sci. 14: 563–570.
Clarke, K.R. 1993. Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust. J. Ecol. 18: 117–143.
Colwell, R.K. and J.A. Coddington. 1994. Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Phil. Trans. R.Soc. B 345: 101–118.
Condit, R., S.P. Hubbell, J.V. Lafrankie, R. Sukumar, R. Manokaran, R.B. Foster and P.S. Ashton. 1996. Species-area and species-individual relationships for tropical trees: a comparison of three 50-ha plots. J. Ecol. 84: 549–562.
Crist, T.O. and J.A. Veech. 2006. Additive partitioning of rarefaction curves and species-area relationships: unifying alpha-, beta- and gamma-diversity with sample size and habitat area. Ecol. Lett. 9: 923–932.
Crist, T.O., J.A. Veech, J.C Gering and K.S. Summerville. 2003. Partitioning species diversity across landscapes and regions: a hierarchical analysis of α, β, and γ diversity. Am. Nat. 162: 734–743.
D’Alessandro, L. and L. Fattorini. 2002. Resampling estimators of species richness from presence-absence data: why they don’t work. Metron 61: 5–19.
Dungan, J.L., J.N. Perry, M.R.T. Dale, P. Legendre, S. Citron-Pousty, M.-J. Fortin, A. Jakomulska, M. Miriti and M.S. Rosemberg. 2002. A balanced view of scale in spatial statistical analysis. Ecography 25: 626–640.
Fattorini, L., 2007. Statistical inference on accumulation curves for inventorying forest diversity: A design-based critical look. Plant Biosyst. 141: 231–242.
Fattorini, L. and G. Tabacchi. 2004. Inventario Nazionale delle Foreste e dei Serbatoi Forestali di Carbonio: il Disegno di Campionamento, MiPAF – Direzione Generale per le Risorse Forestali Montane e Idriche, Corpo Forestale dello Stato, CRAISAFA, Trento.
Ferretti, M. and A. Chiarucci. 2003. Design concepts adopted in long-term forest monitoring programs in Europe—problems for the future? Sci. Tot. Environ. 310: 171–178.
Gering, J.C, T.O. Crist and J.A. Veech. 2003. Additive partitioning of species diversity across multiple spatial scales: implications for regional conservation of biodiversity. Cons. Biol. 17: 488–499.
Gotelli, N.J. and R.K. Colwell. 2001. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol. Lett. 4: 379–391.
Hui, C. 2008. On species-area and species accumulation curves: A comment on Chong and Stohlgren’s index. Ecol. Indic. 8: 327–329.
Kobayashi, S. 1974. The species-area relation I. A model for discrete sampling. Res. Popul. Ecol. 15: 223–237.
Koellner, T., A.M. Hersperger and T. Wohlgemuth. 2004. Rarefaction method for assessing plant species diversity on a regional scale. Ecography 27: 532–544.
Lande, R. 1996. Statistics and partitioning of species diversity, and similarity among multiple communities. Oikos 76: 5–13.
Legg, C.J. and L. Nagy. 2006. Why most conservation monitoring is, but need not be, a waste of time. J. Environ. Manage.78: 194–199.
McCollin, D., L. Moore and T. Sparks. 2000. The flora of a cultural landscape: environmental determinants of change using archival sources. Biol. Conserv. 92: 249–263.
Melo, A.S. 2004. A critique of the use of jackknife and related non-parametric techniques to estimate species richness. Community Ecol. 5: 149–157.
Nagendra, H. and M. Gadgil. 1999. Biodiversity assessment at multiple scales: Linking remotely sensed data with field information. PNAS 96: 9154–9158.
Nekola, J.C. and P.S. White. 1999. The distance decay of similarity in biogeography and ecology. J. Biogeogr. 26: 867–878.
Palmer, M.W. 1995. How should one count species. Nat. Area J. 15: 124–135.
Palmer, M.W., P.G. Earls, B.W. Hoagland, P.S. White and T. Wohlgemuth. 2002. Quantitative tools for perfecting species lists. Environmetrics 13: 121–137.
Palmer, M.W. and P.S. White. 1994. Scale dependence and the species-area relationship. Am. Nat. 144: 717–740.
Plattner, M., S. Birrer and D. Weber. 2004. Data quality in monitoring plant species richness in Switzerland. Community Ecol. 5: 135–143.
Podani, J. 1994. Multivariate Data Analysis in Ecology and Systematics. A methodological guide to the Syntax 5.0 package. SPB Publishing, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Reid, W.V. 1992. How many species will there be? In: T. C. Whitmore and J. A. Sayer (eds.) Tropical Deforestation and Species Extinction. Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 55–73.
Robinson, G.R., M.E. Yurlina and S.N. Handel. 1994. A century of change in the Staten island flora: ecological correlates of species losses and invasions. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 121: 119–129.
Rodrigues, A.S.L., S.J. Andelman, M.I. Bakarr, L. Boitani, T.M. Brooks, R.M. Cowling, L.D.C. Fishpool, G.A.B. da Fonseca, K.J. Gaston, M. Hoffmann, J.S. Long, P.A. Marquet, J.D. Pilgrim, R.L. Pressey, J. Schipper, W. Sechrest, S.N. Stuart, L.G. Underhill, R.W. Waller, M.E.J. Watts and X. Yan. 2004. Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity. Nature 428: 640–643.
Sanders, H.L. 1968. Marine benthic diversity: a comparative study. Am. Nat. 102: 243–282.
Stohlgren, T.J. 2007. Measuring Plant Diversity: Lesson from the Field. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Veech, J.A. andT.O Crist. 2007a. Habitat and climate heterogeneity maintain beta-diversity of birds among landscapes within ecoregions. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 16: 650–656.
Veech J. A and T. O. Crist. 2007b. PARTITION: software for hierarchical additive partitioning of species diversity, version 2.0.
Veech, J.A., K.S. Summerville, T.O Crist and J.C. Gering. 2002. The additive partitioning of species diversity: recent revival of an old idea. Oikos 99: 3–9.
Wiens, J.A. 1989. Spatial scaling in ecology. Funct. Ecol. 3: 385–397.
Wilson, J.B. and A. Chiarucci. 2000. Do plant communities exist? Evidence from scaling-up local species-area relations to the regional level. J. Veg. Sci. 11: 773–775.
Yoccoz, N.G., J.D. Nichols and T. Boulinier. 2001. Monitoring of biological diversity in space and time. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 446–453.
About this article
Cite this article
Chiarucci, A., Bacaro, G., Vannini, A. et al. Quantifying species richness at multiple spatial scales in a Natura 2000 network. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 9, 185–192 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.9.2008.2.7
- Biodiversity assessment
- Biodiversity monitoring
- Conservation biology
- Plant communities
- Reserve network
- Species richness