Quantifying species richness at multiple spatial scales in a Natura 2000 network
Even if the establishment of nature reserves is to date a reality and the increase of protected areas is going to grow year after year, monitoring programs aiming to assess the effectiveness of the established protected areas for biodiversity conservation are still needed. That is the case for the Natura 2000 network in Europe, for which monitoring methods and programs are not yet well-established. A probabilistic sampling procedure is proposed and tested for quantifying and monitoring plant species diversity within a local network of protected areas, namely the Natura 2000 network in the Siena Province, Italy. On the basis of a sampling strategy of one 100 m plot randomly located in each 1 km x 1 km cell, four Sites of Community Importance (SCIs) were investigated in 2005. The gradients in species composition at the plot scale were largely related to elevation and forest cover. The species richness values of the four SCIs were compared by means of sample-based rarefaction curves. Then, additive partitioning of species richness was applied to determine the most important spatial components in determining the total species richness of the network. Compositional differences among the plots within each SCI were the most responsible of the total species richness. These methodologies can be adopted for assessing plant species richness within a large region or within a reserve network and, if combined with additive partitioning, they can be used as a set of large scale indicators of species diversity.
KeywordsBiodiversity Biodiversity assessment Biodiversity monitoring Conservation biology Flora Plant communities Reserve network Species richness Vegetation
Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling
Site of Community Importance.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- D’Alessandro, L. and L. Fattorini. 2002. Resampling estimators of species richness from presence-absence data: why they don’t work. Metron 61: 5–19.Google Scholar
- Fattorini, L. and G. Tabacchi. 2004. Inventario Nazionale delle Foreste e dei Serbatoi Forestali di Carbonio: il Disegno di Campionamento, MiPAF – Direzione Generale per le Risorse Forestali Montane e Idriche, Corpo Forestale dello Stato, CRAISAFA, Trento.Google Scholar
- Palmer, M.W. 1995. How should one count species. Nat. Area J. 15: 124–135.Google Scholar
- Podani, J. 1994. Multivariate Data Analysis in Ecology and Systematics. A methodological guide to the Syntax 5.0 package. SPB Publishing, The Hague, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
- Reid, W.V. 1992. How many species will there be? In: T. C. Whitmore and J. A. Sayer (eds.) Tropical Deforestation and Species Extinction. Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 55–73.Google Scholar
- Rodrigues, A.S.L., S.J. Andelman, M.I. Bakarr, L. Boitani, T.M. Brooks, R.M. Cowling, L.D.C. Fishpool, G.A.B. da Fonseca, K.J. Gaston, M. Hoffmann, J.S. Long, P.A. Marquet, J.D. Pilgrim, R.L. Pressey, J. Schipper, W. Sechrest, S.N. Stuart, L.G. Underhill, R.W. Waller, M.E.J. Watts and X. Yan. 2004. Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity. Nature 428: 640–643.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Stohlgren, T.J. 2007. Measuring Plant Diversity: Lesson from the Field. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Veech J. A and T. O. Crist. 2007b. PARTITION: software for hierarchical additive partitioning of species diversity, version 2.0.Google Scholar
- Wiens, J.A. 1989. Spatial scaling in ecology. Funct. Ecol. 3: 385–397.Google Scholar
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.