Conservation treatments often take place at the scale of vegetation stands and affect within-stand heterogeneity and coexistence patterns of species first. Therefore, it is important to capture changes in these characteristics of vegetation to assess response to treatments early. We propose a method based on Juhász-Nagy’s information theory models, which is capable of describing fine-scale spatial structure of plant communities and characterizes temporal processes as a function of spatial pattern. The proposed multiscale approach handles structural complexity and its dependence on spatial scales with the help of a few coenological descriptors and helps to reveal how fine-scale vegetation pattern affects dynamics. The information statistical functions used in our study (species combination diversity, FD and associatum, As) characterize the scale-dependent variability of multispecies coexistence (structural complexity) and multispecies spatial dependence (the degree of spatial organization). The maxima of these functions and the related characteristic areas (plot sizes) can be used to construct an abstract coenostate space, where spatiotemporal processes (degradation, regeneration) can be followed. We demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed methods for detecting degradation and monitoring vegetation changes in different stands (18 seminatural and 13 slightly degraded stands) of Brachypodium pinnatum dominated wooded steppe meadows in Hungary. The information theory measures captured changes of fine-scale vegetation patterns that remained unexplored by species richness and Shannon diversity. The maximum values of information statistical measures and the related characteristic areas detected differences between seminatural and slightly degraded stands. In the coenostate space, seminatural stands appeared to be less variable compared to degraded ones. Seminatural stands from various geographic locations were less dispersed in this space, i.e., less heterogeneous than degraded ones. The two regions of the coenostate-space defined by the set of seminatural and degraded stands were significantly different. Furthermore, we conclude that the region containing seminatural stands can be regarded as a reference region in this abstract space. Temporal variation of seminatural and degraded stands was also clearly different. Therefore, we recommend the approach for exploring the actual dynamic states of vegetation stands to be treated and for following consequences of treatments in order to determine effectiveness of the conservation action.
Florula (species combination) Diversity
Anand, M. 2000. The fundamentals of vegetation change: complexity rules. Acta Biotheor. 48: 1–14.
Anand, M. and L. Orlóci. 1996. Complexity in plant communities: the notion and quantification. J. Theoret. Biol. 179: 179–186.
Anand, M. and R. Kadmon. 2000. Community-level analysis of spatiotemporal plant dynamics. EcoScience 7: 101–110.
Bartha, S. 1992. Preliminary scaling for multispecies coalitions in primary succession. Abstr. Bot. 16: 31–41.
Bartha, S. 2001. Spatial relationships between plant litter, gopher disturbance and vegetation at different stages of old-field succession. App. Veg. Sci. 4: 53–62.
Bartha, S., G. Campatella, R. Canullo, J. Bódis and L. Mucina. 2004. On the importance of fine-scale spatial complexity in vegetation restoration. Int. J. Ecol. Environ. Sci. 30: 101–116.
Bartha, S., T. Czárán and J. Podani. 1998. Exploring plant community dynamics in abstract coenostate spaces. Abstr. Bot. 22: 49–66.
Bartha, S. and M. Kertész. 1998. The importance of neutral-models in detecting interspecific spatial assocations from ’trainsect’ data. Tiscia 31: 85–98.
Bobbink, R. and J.H. Willems. 1987. Increasing dominance of Brachypodium pinnatum (L.) Beauv. in chalk grasslands: a threat to a species-rich ecosystem. Biol. Conserv. 40: 301–314.
Bobbink, R. and J.H. Willems. 1992. Restoration management of abandoned chalk grassland in the Netherlands. Biodiversity and Conserv. 57: 1–21.
Campetella, G., R. Canullo and S. Bartha. 1999. Fine-scale spatial pattern analysis of the herb layer of woodland vegetation using information theory. Plant Biosyst. 133: 277–288.
Campetella, G., R. Canullo and S. Bartha. 2004. Coenostate descriptors and spatial dependence in vegetation – derived variables in monitoring forest dynamics and assembly rules. Community Ecol. 5: 105–114.
Canullo, R. and G. Campetella. 2005. Spatial patterns of plant species, guilds and biological types in the regenerative phase of a beech coppice (Torricchio Mountain Nature Reserve, Apennines, Italy). Acta Bot. Gallica 152: 529–543.
Cardinale, B.J., K. Nelson and M.A. Palmer. 2000. Linking species diversity to the functioning of ecosystems: on the importance of environmental context. Oikos 91: 175–183.
Chesson, P.L. and T.J. Chase. 1986. Overview. Non-equilibrium community theories: chance, variability, history and coexistence. In: F. Diamond and T.J. Case (eds.), Community Ecology. Harper and Row, NY. pp. 229–239.
Czárán, T. and S. Bartha. 1989. The effect of spatial pattern on community dynamics. A comparison of simulated and field data. Vegetatio 83: 229–239.
Czárán, T. and S. Bartha. 1992. Spatiotemporal dynamic models of plant populations and communities. TREE 7: 38–42.
Diggle, P.J. 1983. Statistical Analysis of Spatial Point Patterns.Academic Press, London.
Drake, J.A. 1990. Communities as assembled structures: do rules govern pattern? TREE 5: 159–164.
Facelli, J.M. and S.T.A. Pickett. 1990. Markovian chains and the role of history in succession. TREE 5: 27–31.
Fekete, G., Virágh, K., Aszalós, R. and Orlóci L. 1998. Landscape and coenological differentiation in Brachypodium pinnatum grassland. Coenoses 13: 39–53.
Fekete, G., K. Virágh, R. Aszalós and I. Précsényi. 2000. Static and dynamic approaches to landscape heterogeneity in the Hungarian wooded steppe zone. J. Veg. Sci. 11: 375–382.
Gosz, J., D. Peters, M. Kertész, E. Kovács-Láng, Gy. Kröel-Dulay and S. Bartha. 2000. Organization of grasslands along ecological gradients: US-Hungarian LTER Grassland cooperation. In: K. Lajtha and K. Vanderbilt (eds.), Cooperation in Long-term Ecological research in Central and Eastern Europe. Proceedings of the ILTER Regional Workshop, 1999, Budapest, Hungary. Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR. pp. 67–76.
Grabulsky, M.F. and J.M. Paruelo. 2004. Remote sensing of protected areas to derive baseline vegetation functioning characteristics. J. Veg. Sci. 15: 711–720.
Hobbs, R.J. and D.A. Norton. 1996. Towards a conceptual framework for restoration ecology. Restoration Ecol. 4: 83–110.
Hochstrasser, T. 1995. The structure of different loess grassland types in Hungary. M.Sc. thesis, Vácrátót, Hungary. 74 p.
Hooper, D.U., F.S. Chapin, J.J. Ewel, A. Hector, P. Inchausti, S. Lavorel, L.H. Lawton, D.M. Lodge, M. Loreau, S. Naeem, B. Schmid, H. Setala, A.J. Symstad, J. Vandermeer and D.A. Wardle. 2005. Effect of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: consequences of current knowledge. Ecol. Monogr. 75: 3–35.
Horváth, A. 1998. INFOTHEM program: new possibilities of spatial series analysis based on information theory methods. Tiscia 31: 71–84.
Horváth, A. 2002. Organization of spatial pattern of loess vegetation in the Mezöföld region. Synbiologica Hungarica 5, Scientia, Budapest. 174 p. (in Hungarian)
Illyés, E. 2002. Vegetációtérképezés és löszgyepek vizsgálata Máriahalom környékén (Vegetation mapping and study of loess grasslands at the hilly region of Eastern Gerecse in Hungary ). (MSc Thesis), ELTE, Budapest.
Ittzés, P., É. Jakó, Á. Kun, A. Kun and J. Podani. 2005. A discrete mathematical method for the analysis of spatial pattern. Community Ecol. 6: 177–190.
Juhász-Nagy, P. 1976. Spatial dependence of plant populations. Part 1. Equivalence analysis (an outline for a new model). Acta Bot. Acad. Sci. Hung. 22: 61–78.
Juhász-Nagy, P. 1980. Modelling of coexistential structures in coenology. Academic Doctoral Thesis, MTA, Budapest (in Hungarian). 238 p.
Juhász-Nagy, P. 1984. Spatial dependence of plant populations. Part 2. A family of new models. Acta Bot. Acad. Sci. Hung. 30: 363–402.
Juhász-Nagy, P. 1993. Notes on compositional diversity. Hydrobiol. 249: 173–182.
Juhász-Nagy, P. and J. Podani. 1983. Information theory methods for the study of spatial processes in succession. Vegetatio 51: 129–140.
Kertész, M., B. Lhotsky and I. Hahn. 2001. Detection of fine-scale relations between species composition and biomass in grassland. Community Ecol. 2: 221–230.
Kinzig, A.P., S.W. Pacala and D. Tilman. 2002. (eds.) The Functional Consequences of Biodiversity: Empirical Progress and Theoretical Extensions. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Li, Z.Q., J. Bogaert and I. Nijs. 2005. Gap pattern and colonization opportunities in plant communities: effects of species richness, mortality, and spatial aggregation. Ecography 28: 777–790.
Loreau, M., P. Naeem, P. Inchausti, J. Bengtsson, J.P. Grime, A. Hector, D.U. Hooper, M.A. Huston, D. Raffaelli, B. Schmid, D. Tilman and D.A. Wardle. 2001. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Current knowledge and future challenges. Science 290: 804–808.
Loreau, M., Naeem, S., Inchausti, P. (eds.) 2002. Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning. Synthesis and Perspectives. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford. 294 p.
Magurran, A.E. 1988. Ecological Diversity and its Measurement. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.
Myster, R.W. and S.T.A. Pickett. 1990. Initial conditions, history and successional pathways in ten contrasting old fields. Am. Midl. Nat. 124: 231–238.
Oborny, B. 1994. Growth rules in clonal plants and predictability of the environment: A simulation study. J. Ecol. 82: 341–351.
Oksanen, J. 1997. Plant neighbour diversity. J. Veg. Sci. 8: 255–258.
Pickett, S.T.A. and V.T. Parker. 1994. Avoiding the old pitfalls: opportunities in a new discipline. Restoration Ecol. 2: 75–79.
Pickett, S.T.A., V.T. Parker and P. Fiedler. 1992. The new paradigm in ecology. Implications for conservation biology above the species level. In: P. Fiedler and S. Jain (eds.), Conservation Biology. The Theory and Practice of Nature Conservation, Preservation, and Management. Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 65–88.
Pielou, E.C. 1975. Ecological Diversity. Wiley, New York.
Podani, J. 1984. Spatial processes in the analysis of vegetation: theory and review. Acta Bot. Hung. 30: 75–118.
Podani, J. 1992. Space series analysis of vegetation processes reconsidered. Abstr. Bot. 17: 37–51.
Podani, J. 2006. With a machete through the jungle: some thoughts on community diversity. Acta Biotheor. 54: 125–131.
Podani, J., T. Czárán and S. Bartha. 1993. Pattern, area and diversity: the importance of spatial scale in species assemblages. Abstr. Bot. 17: 289–302.
Podani, J., T. Czárán and I. Scheuring. 1998. Individual-centered analysis of community patterns representing multi-species assemblages. J. Veg. Sci. 8: 259.270.
Pueyo, Y., C.L. Aladas and C. Ferrer-Benimeli. 2005. Is the analysis of plant community structure better than common species-diversity indices for assessing the effects of livestock grazing on a Mediterranean arid ecosystem? J. Arid Environ. 64: 698–712.
Ricotta, C. and M. Anand. 2004. Spatial scaling of structural complexity in plant communities. Int. J. Ecol. Environ. Sci. 30: 93–99.
Ricotta, C. and M. Anand. 2006. Spatial complexity of ecological communities: Bringing the gap between probabilistic and nonprobabilistic uncertainty measures. Ecol. Model. 197: 59–66.
Shannon, C. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell. Syst. Tech. J. 27: 379–423.
Sluis, W.J. 2002. Patterns of species richness and composition in re-created grassland. Restoration Ecol. 10: 677–684.
Standovár, T., P. Ódor, R. Aszalós and L. Gálhidy. 2006. Sensitivity of ground layer vegetation diversity descriptors in indicating forest naturalness. Community Ecol. 7: 199–209.
Szollát, Gy. and S. Bartha. 1991. Pattern analyses of dolomite grassland communities using information theory models. Abstr. Bot. 15: 47–60.
Thórhalsdóttir, T.E. 1990. The dynamics of a grassland community. A simultaneous investigation of spatial and temporal heterogeneity at various scales. J. Ecol. 78: 884- 908.
Tóthmérész, B. 1994. Statistical analysis of spatial pattern in plant communities. Coenoses 9: 33–41.
Tóthmérész, B. 1998. On the characterization of scale-dependent diversity. Abstr. Bot. 22: 149–156.
Tóthmérész, B. and Zs. Erdei. 1992. The effect of dominance in information theory characteristics of plant communities. Abstr. Bot. 16: 43–47.
Tutin, T.G. (ed.) et al. 2001. Flora Europaea, CD-version. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
Virágh, K. 1989. The effect of selective herbicides on structural changes of an old perennial grassland community; An experimental approach to the study of community stability: resilience and resistance. ActaBot. Hung. 35: 99–125.
Virágh, K. 1991. Diversity and resilience after herbicide disturbances in a Hungarian perennial grassland community. In: F.D. Pineda, M.A. Casado et al. (eds.), Biological Diversity. Fundación Ramon Aceres, Madrid. pp. 223–227.
Virágh, K. andS. Bartha. 1996. The effect of current dynamical state of a loess steppe community on its responses to disturbances. Tiscia 30: 3–13.
Virágh, K. and S. Bartha. 1998. Interspecific associations in different successional stages of Brachypodium pinnatum grasslands after deforestation in Hungary. Tiscia 31: 3–12.
Virágh, K. and S. Bartha. 2003. Species turnover as a function of vegetation pattern. Tiscia 34: 47–56.
Virágh, K., S. Bartha, S. and Z. Botta-Dukát. 2000. Fine-scale coalition structure in Brachypodium grassland. Proc. IAVS Symp., 2000. Opulus Press, Uppsala, p. 102.
Watkins, A.J. and J.B. Wilson. 1992. Fine scale community structure of lawns. J. Ecol. 80: 15–24.
White, P.S. and J.L. Walker. 1997. Approximating Nature’s variation: selecting and using reference information in restoration ecology. Restoration Ecol. 5: 338–349.
Wu, J. and O. Loucks. 1995. From balance of nature to hierarchical patch dynamics: a paradigm shift in ecology. Q. Rev. Biol. 70: 439–464.
Zar, J.H. 1984. Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
Zobel, M. 1997. The relative role of species pools in determining plant species richness: an alternative explanation of species coexistence. TREE 12: 266–269.
About this article
Cite this article
Virágh, K., Horváth, A., Bartha, S. et al. A multiscale methodological approach for monitoring the effectiveness of grassland management. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 9, 237–246 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.9.2008.2.13
- Fine-scale pattern
- Indicators of degradation and regeneration
- Information theory
- Spatial scaling
- Structural complexity
- Tutin et al. (2001)