Advertisement

Community Ecology

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 133–141 | Cite as

Effects of simulated grazing on open perennial sand grassland

  • G. ÓnodiEmail author
  • M. Kertész
  • Z. Botta-Dukát
Article

Abstract

We studied biomass and species composition changes of open perennial sand grassland (Festucetum vaginatae) as response to different levels of simulated grazing pressures. We conducted a factorial micro-plot field experiment on previously grazed grassland that has been abandoned for a long time. In a two-way factorial design of 12 treatments x 8 repeats, we performed clipping (twice a year for three years) and litter treatments (removing and adding litter once at the beginning of the experiment) to simulate components of grazing, namely the biomass removal and the reduction of the litter accumulation. We used field spectroscopy and visual canopy cover estimation to measure the effects on the amount of the above-ground green biomass and on the vegetation composition.

Litter treatments affected vegetation composition slightly during the experiment. We found that clipping decreases the canopy cover of Festuca vaginata. However, compensation occurred in case of the above-ground biomass of the matrix species due to moderate clipping. Both moderate and heavy clipping increased the number of species in the plots. Heavy clipping had a strong negative effect on the biomass and canopy cover of Festuca vaginata, and in contrast with moderate clipping it changed the gap structure of the community. It increased the size of the gaps and the abundance of the gap species as well. Our results show that moderate grazing pressure has favourable effect on the open perennial sand grassland community in terms of species density while it does not cause degradation of the matrix species.

Keywords

Clipping Compensatory growth Festucetum vaginatae Field spectroscopy Litter effects 

Abbreviations:

NDVI

Normalized Differential Vegetation Index

Nomenclature

Simon (2000) 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albertson, F. W., Riegel, A. and Launchbaugh, J. L. 1953. Effects of different intensities of clipping on short grasses in West-Central Kansas. Ecology 34: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belsky, A. J. 1987. The effects of grazing: confounding of ecosystem, community, and organism scales. Amer. Nat. 129: 777–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bosy, J. L. and R. J. Reader. 1995. Mechanism underlying the suppression of forb seedling emergence by grass (Poa pratensis) litter. Funct. Ecol. 9: 635–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bullock, J. M., B. Clear Hill, M. P. Dale and J. Silvertown. 1994. An experimental study of the effects of sheep grazing on vegetation change in a species-poor grassland and the role of seedling recruitment into gaps. J. Appl. Ecol. 31: 493–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carson, W. P. and C. J. Peterson. 1990. The role of litter in an old field community: impact of litter quantity in different seasons on plant species richness and abundance. Oecologia 85: 8–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crawley, M. J. 1983. Herbivory: The Dynamics of Animal-Plant Interactions. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.Google Scholar
  7. Foster, B. L. and K. L. Gross. 1998. Species richness in a successional grassland: effects of nitrogen enrichment and plant litter. Ecology 79: 2593–2602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Frank, D. A. and S. J. McNaughton. 1993. Evidence for the promotion of aboveground grassland production by native large herbivores in Yellowstone National Park. Oecologia 96: 157–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goodin, D. G. and Henebry, G. M. 1998. Seasonality of finely-resolved spatial structure of NDVI and its component reflectances in tallgrass prairie. International J. Remote Sensing 19: 3213–3220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gough, L. and J. B. Grace. 1998. Herbivore effects on plant species density at varying productivity levels. Ecology 79: 1586–1594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Holland, E. A., W. J. Parton, J. K. Detling, and D. L. Coppock. 1992. Physiological responses of plant populations to herbivory and their consequences for ecosystem nutrient flow. Amer. Nat. 140: 685–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hulbert, L. C. 1969. Fire and litter effects in undisturbed bluestem prairie in Kansas. Ecology 50: 874–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hulme, P. E. 1996. Herbivory, plant regeneration, and species coexistence. J. Ecol. 84: 609–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kárpáti, I. and V. Kárpáti. 1954. The aspects of the calciphilous turf (Festucetum vaginatae danubiale) in the environs of Vácrátót in 1952. Acta Bot. Acad. Sci. Hung. 1: 129–157.Google Scholar
  15. Kertész, M., B. Lhotsky and I. Hahn. 2001. Detection of fine-scale relationships between species composition and biomass in grassland. Community Ecology 2: 221–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kovács-Láng, E. 1974. Examination of dynamics of organic matter in a perennial open sandy steppe-meadow (Festucetum vaginatae danubiale) at the Csévharaszt IBP sample area (Hungary). Acta Bot. Acad. Sci. Hung. 20: 309–326.Google Scholar
  17. Mazancourt, C., M. Loreau and L. Abbadie. 1998. Grazing optimalization and nutrient cycling: when do herbivores enhance plant production?. Ecology 79: 2242–2252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McNaughton, S. J. 1983. Compensatory plant growth as a response to herbivory. Oikos 40: 329–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Roujean, J. L. and F. M. Breon. 1995. Estimating PAR absorbed by vegetation from bidirectional reflectance measurements. Remote Sensing of Environment 51: 375–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schuster, J. L. 1964. Root development of native plants under three grazing intensities. Ecology 45: 63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Semmartin, M. and M. Oesterheld. 2001. Effects of grazing pattern and nitrogen availability on primary productivity. Oecologia 126: 225–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Simon, T. 2000. A magyarországi edényes flóra határozója (Identification Guide of Hungarian Vascular Flora). Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó, Budapest. (In Hungarian.)Google Scholar
  23. Verhoeven, K. J. F., Simonsen, K. L. and McIntyre L. M. 2005. Implementing false discovery rate control: increasing your power. Oikos 108: 643–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. White, M. A., Asner, G. P., Nemani, R. R., Privette, J. L. and Running, S. W. 2000. Measuring fractional cover and leaf area index in arid ecosystems: digital camera, radiation transmittance, and laser altimetry methods. Remote Sensing of Environment 74: 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Willms, W. D. and J. F. Dormaar. 1985. Effects of stocking rate on a rough fescue grassland vegetation. J. Range Manage. 38: 220–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Xiong, S. and C. Nilsson. 1999. The effects of plant litter on vegetation: a meta-analysis. J. Ecol. 87: 984–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2006

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Ecology and BotanyHungarian Academy of SciencesVácrátótHungary

Personalised recommendations