Advertisement

Community Ecology

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 245–247 | Cite as

Generalised entropy indices have a long history in ecology — a comment

  • G. L. LöveiEmail author
Forum

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berger, W. H. and F. L. Parker. 1970. Diversity of planktonic Foraminifera in deep sea sediments. Science 168:1345–1347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bogya, S., V. Markó and C. Szinetár. 2000. Effect of pest management systems on foliage- and grass-dwelling spider communities in an apple orchard in Hungary. Int. J. Pest Manage. 46:241–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fuisz, T.I. and R. Yosef. 2001. Effect of habitat quality on the hunting behaviour of breeding Great Grey Shrikes (Lanius excubitor). Acta Zool. Acad. Sci. Hung. 47:311–320.Google Scholar
  4. Hill, M. O. 1973. Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and is consequences. Ecology 54:427–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jakab, T., Z. Müller, G. Dévai and B. Tóthmérész. 2002. Dragonfly assemblages of a shallow lake type reservoir (Tisza-tó, Hungary) and its surroundings. Acta Zool. Acad. Sci. Hung. 48:161–171.Google Scholar
  6. Keylock, J. C. 2005. Simpson diversity and the Shannon-Wiener index as special cases of a generalized entropy. Oikos 109:203–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lewontin, R. C. 1972. The apportionment of human diversity. Evol. Biol. 6:381–398.Google Scholar
  8. Magurran, A. E. 2003. Measuring Biological Diversity. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  9. Markó, V. and F. Kádár. 2005. Effects of different insecticide disturbance levels and weed patterns on carabid beetle assemblages. Acta Phytopathol. Entomol. Hung. 40:111–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Oksanen, J. 2004. ‘vegan’. Community Ecology Package. URL: https://doi.org/cc.oulu.fi/~jarioksa/ Accessed: 31 May 2005
  11. Patil, G. P. and C. Taillie. 1979. An overview of diversity. In: Grassle, J. F., G. P. Patil, W. Smith and C. Taillie, C. (eds), Ecological Diversity in Theory and Practice. Int. Cooperat. Publ. House, Maryland. pp. 3–27.Google Scholar
  12. Rennolls, K. and Y. Laumonier. 2000. Species diversity structure analysis at two sites in the tropical rain forest of Sumatra. J. Trop. Ecol. 16:253–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rényi, A. 1961. On measures of entropy and information. In: Neyman, J. (ed.), 4th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Berkeley, pp. 547–561.Google Scholar
  14. Ricotta, C. and G. Avena. 2001. Rényi’s information as a linear combination of species richness and dominance concentration. Plant Biosyst. 135:207–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Shannon, C. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Technol. J. 27:379–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Simpson, E. H. 1949. Measurement of diversity. Nature 163:688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Southwood, T. R. E. and P. A. Henderson. 2000. Ecological Methods. 3rd ed. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  18. Tóth, F. and J. Kiss. 1999. Comparative analyses of epigaeic spider assemblages in northern Hungarian winter wheat fields and their adjacent margins. J. Arachnol. 27:241–248.Google Scholar
  19. Tóthmérész, B. 1993. DivOrd 1.50: A program for diversity ordering. Tiscia 27:33–44.Google Scholar
  20. Tóthmérész, B. 1995. Comparison of different methods of diversity ordering. J. Veg. Sci. 6:283–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tóthmérész, B. 2005. Diversity characterizations in R. In: Lövei, G.L. and S. Toft, (eds.), European Carabidology 2003. Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Report Series No. 114, pp. 333–344.Google Scholar
  22. Tsiafouli, M.A., A. S., Kallimanis, E., Katana, G. P. Stamou and S. P. Squardelis. 2005. Responses of soil microarthropods to experimental short-term manipulations of soil moisture. Appl. Soil Ecol. 29:17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2005

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Integrated Pest Management, Danish Institute of Agricultural SciencesFlakkebjerg Research CentreSlagelseDenmark

Personalised recommendations