Advertisement

Community Ecology

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 69–79 | Cite as

Spatiotemporal mapping of the dry season vegetation response of sagebrush steppe

  • R. A. Washington-AllenEmail author
  • R. D. Ramsey
  • N. E. West
Article

Abstract

The vegetation dynamics of semi-arid and arid landscapes are temporally and spatially heterogeneous and subject to various disturbance regimes that act on decadal scales. Traditional field-based monitoring methods have failed to sample adequately in time and space in order to capture this heterogeneity and thus lack the spatial extent and the long-term continuous time series of data necessary to detect anomalous dynamics in landscape behavior. Time series of ecological indicators of land degradation that are collected synoptically from local to global spatial scales can be derived from the 33-year and continuing Landsat satellite archive. Consequently, a retrospective study was conducted on a commercially grazed sagebrush steppe dominated Utah landscape using a time series of standardized Landsat imagery for the period 1972 to 1997. The study had the objectives to (1) characterize and map the historical trends of a remotely-sensed index of vegetation response, a correlate of vegetation cover or phytomass, and (2) to retrospectively infer the cause of this response to historical records of grazing and wet and drought periods. A time series of dry season vegetation index maps were statistically clustered to generate a spatio-temporal map of three coarse trends of vegetation response, i.e., declining, stable, and increasing trends. This study showed that 71% of the landscape’s locations had an increasing trend and 29% had a stable trend over the 26-year period. The increasing trend locations were positively correlated with site water balance [the Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI)], i.e., vegetation response increased during wet periods and decreased during drought. The increasing trend was positively and negatively (non-linearly) correlated with grazing in individual paddocks from 1980 to 1997.

Keywords

Landsat Pastoralists Rangelands Remote sensing Retrospective Time series 

Abbreviations:

AU

Animal unit

AUYR-1

Grazing pressure

AUDHa-1

Stocking rate

AUHa-1

Stocking density

DL&L

Deseret Land & Livestock C. Ranch

OLS

Ordinary Least Squares regression

PCA

Principal Components Analysis

PDSI

Palmer Drought Severity Index

SAVI

Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index

VI

Vegetation Index

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alley, W. M. 1984. The Palmer drought severity index: Limitations and assumptions. J. Clim. App. Meteoro. 23:1100–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bastiaanssen, W.G.M. 1998. Remote Sensing in Water Resources Management: The State of the Art, Int. Water Manage. Inst., Colombo, Sri Lanka.Google Scholar
  3. Beck, E.W. 1994. The effect of resource availability on the activity of white-tailed prairie dogs, MS Thesis, Utah State Univ., Logan, Utah.Google Scholar
  4. Bonan, G. 2002. Ecological Climatology Concepts and Applications, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  5. Callahan, K. 2002. Validation of a radiometric normalization procedure for satellite derived imagery within a change detection framework, MS Thesis, Utah State Univ., Logan, Utah.Google Scholar
  6. Chronic, H. 1990. Roadside Geology of Utah, Mountain Press Publishing Co., Missoula, Montana.Google Scholar
  7. Dickey, D.A. and W.A. Fuller. 1979. Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root.J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 74:427–431.Google Scholar
  8. Eastman, J.R. and J.E. McKendry. 1991. Change and Time Series Analysis, Explorations in Geographic Information Systems Technology. Vol. 1.United Nations Inst. for Training and Res., European Office, Palais des Nations CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  9. ERDAS. 1994. ERDAS Field Guide, ERDAS Inc., Atlanta, Ga.Google Scholar
  10. ESRI (Environmental Systems Research Institute). 1991. Cell-based Modeling with GRID, ESRI. Redlands, California.Google Scholar
  11. Granger, C.W. J. and P. Newbold. 1974. Spurious regressions in econometrics. J. Econometrics 2:111–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frazier, B.E. and Y. Cheng. 1989. Remote sensing of soils in the eastern Palouse region with Landsat Thematic Mapper. Remote Sens. Environ. 28:317–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Glantz, M.H. 2001. Currents of change: El Niño and La Niña Impacts on Climate and Society. Second edition. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  14. Graetz, R.D., R.P. Pech and A.W. Davis. 1988. The assessment and monitoring of sparsely vegetated rangelands using calibrated Landsat data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 9:1201–1222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hall, F.G., D.E. Strebel, J.E. Nickeson and J. Goetz. 1991. Radio-metric rectification: Towards a common radiometric response among multidate, multisensor images. Remote Sens. Environ. 35:11–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heitschmidt, R.K. and C.A. Taylor Jr. 1991. Livestock production. In: R.K. Heitschmidt and J.W. Stuth (eds.), Grazing Management: An Ecological Perspective. Timberland Press, Portland, Oregon. pp. 161–177.Google Scholar
  17. Hogeweg, P. 2002. Computing an organism: on the interface between informatic and dynamic processes. BioSystems 64:97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Holechek, J.L. 1988. An approach for setting the stocking rate. Rangelands 10:10–14.Google Scholar
  19. Holmgren, M., M. Scheffer, E. Ezcurra, J.R. Gutiérrez and G.M.J. Mohren. 2001. El Niño effects on the dynamics of terrestrial ecosystems. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:89–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Huete, A.R. 1988. A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI). Remote Sens. Environ. 25:295–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hostert, P., A. Roder, J. Hill, T. Udlhoven and G. Tsiourlis. 2003. Retrospective studies of grazing-induced land degradation: a case study in central Crete, Greece. Int. J. Remote Sens. 24:4019–4034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hunt, C.B. 1974. Natural Regions of the United States and Canada, W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, California.Google Scholar
  23. Jameson, D.A. 1988. Modeling rangeland ecosystems for monitoring arid adaptive management. In: P. Tueller (ed.), Vegetation Science Applications for Rangeland Analysis and Management. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. pp. 189–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jensen, J.R. 1996. Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective, 2nd ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  25. Knight, D. 1994. Mountains and Plains: The Ecology of Wyoming Landscapes, Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, Connecticut.Google Scholar
  26. Lageson, D.R. and D.R. Spearing. 1991. Roadside Geology of Wyoming, Second Edition, Mountain Press Publishing Co., Missoula, Montana.Google Scholar
  27. Laycock,W. 1991. Stable states and thresholds ofrange condition on North American rangelands: A viewpoint. J. Range. Manage. 44:427–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Loehle, C. 1985. Optimal stocking for semi-desert range: a catastrophe theory model. Ecol. Modeling 27:285–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lockwood, J.A. and D.R. Lockwood. 1993. Catastrophe theory: A unified paradigm for rangeland ecosystem dynamics. J. Range Manage. 46:282–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lunetta, R.S. and Sturdevant, J.A. 1993. The North American landscape characterization Landsat Pathfinder Project. In: L.R. Pettinger (ed.), Land Information from Space-based Systems, Pecora 12 Symposium, Proc. Amer. Soc. Photogrammetry and Remote Sens., Bethesda, Md. pp. 363–371.Google Scholar
  31. Magnuson, J.J. 1990. Long-term ecological research and the invisible present. BioScience 40:495–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Markham, B.L. and J.L. Barker. 1986. Landsat MSS and TM-post calibration dynamic ranges, exoatmospheric reflectances and at-satellite temperatures. Earth Observation Satellite Co. (EOSAT) Landsat Tech. Notes 1:3–8.Google Scholar
  33. Noy-Meir, I. 1973. Desert ecosystems: Environment and producers. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Sys. 4:25–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Noy-Meir, I. 1975. Stability of grazing systems: An application of predator-prey graphs. J. Ecol. 63:459–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Palacios-Orueta, A. and S.L. Ustin. 1998. Remote sensing of soil properties in the Santa Monica mountains I. Spectral analysis. Remote Sens. Environ. 65:170–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Palmer, W.C. 1965. Meteorologic Drought. U.S. Weather Bureau, Res. Paper No. 45.Google Scholar
  37. Pickup, G. and D.J. Nelson. 1984. Use of Landsat radiance parameters to distinguish soil erosion, stability, and deposition in arid central Australia. Remote Sens. Environ. 16:195–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Reeves, M.C., J.C. Winslow and S.W. Running. 2001. Mapping weekly rangeland vegetation productivity using MODIS algorithms. J. Range. Manage. 54:A90–A105.Google Scholar
  39. Schumm, S. A. 1991. To Interpret the Earth: Ten Ways To Be Wrong, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  40. Sellers, P. J., 1985. Canopy reflectance, photosynthesis and transpiration. Int. J. Remote Sens. 6:1335–1372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shaw, R.J. 1989. Vascular Plants of Northern Utah: An Identification Manual. Utah State Univ. Press, Logan, Utah.Google Scholar
  42. Spies, T.A., W.J. Ripple and G.A. Bradshaw. 1994. Dynamics and pattern of a managed coniferous forest landscape in Oregon. Ecol. Appl. 4:555–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. SPSS Inc. 1999. SPSS Trends 10.0, SPSS Inc. Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
  44. Suter II, G.W. 1993. Ecological Risk Assessment, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Louisiana.Google Scholar
  45. Van Niel, T. G. 1995. Classification of vegetation and analysis of its recent trends at Camp Williams, Utah using GIS and remote sensing techniques, MS Thesis, Utah State Univ., Logan, Utah.Google Scholar
  46. Washington-Allen, R. A. 2003. Retrospective Ecological Risk Assessment of Commercially-Grazed Rangelands using Multitemporal Satellite Imagery, PhD Thesis, Utah State Univ., Logan, Utah.Google Scholar
  47. Washington-Allen, R.A., N.E. West, R. D. Ramsey and D.K. Phillips. 2003a. Retrospective Assessment of soil stability on a landscape subject to commercial grazing. African Journal of Range & Forage Science 20:127Google Scholar
  48. Washington-Allen, R.A., N.E. West and R. D. Ramsey. 2003b. Remote sensing-based dynamical systems analysis of sagebrush steppe vegetation in rangelands. African Journal of Range & Forage Science 20:100Google Scholar
  49. Washington-Allen, R. A., R. D. Ramsey, B. E. Norton and N. E. West. 1998. Change detection of the effect of severe drought on subsistence agropastoral communities on the Bolivian Altiplano. Int. J. Remote Sens. 19:1319–1333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. West, N.E. and J.A. Young. 2000. Intermountain valleys and lower mountain slopes. In: M.G. Barbour and W.D. Billings (eds), North American Terrestrial Vegetation, 2nd ed. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, N.Y. pp. 255–284.Google Scholar
  51. Wiens, J.A. 1995. Landscape mosaics and ecological theory. In: L. Hanson, L. Fahrig and G. Merriam (eds), Mosaic Landscapes and Ecological Processes. Chapman and Hall, London, UK. pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
  52. Wolfe, M.L., M.E. Ritchie, and R. Danvir. 2000. Managing for cattle and wildlife on Deseret Ranch. In: Ecol. Soc. Amer. (ed.), Abstracts, 85th annual meeting Ecol. Soc. Amer., Snowbird, Utah. pp. 37.Google Scholar
  53. Wu, J. and R. Hobbs. 2002. Key issues and research priorities in landscape ecology: An idiosyncratic synthesis. Landscape Ecology 17:355–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wylie, B.K., D.J. Meyer, L.L. Tieszen and S. Mannel. 2002. Satellite mapping of surface biophysical parameters at the biome scale over the North American grasslands: A case study.Remote Sens. Environ. 79:266–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Yafee, R.A. and M. McGhee. 2000. Introduction to Time Series Analysis and Forecasting with Applications of SAS and SPSS, Academic Press, San Diego, Ca.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2004

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. A. Washington-Allen
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • R. D. Ramsey
    • 1
  • N. E. West
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Forest, Range, and Wildlife SciencesUtah State UniversityLoganUSA
  2. 2.Environmental Sciences DivisionOak Ridge National LaboratoryOak RidgeUSA

Personalised recommendations