Community Ecology

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 18–30 | Cite as

Patterns of biodiversity in the northwestern Italian Alps: a multi-taxa approach

  • R. ViterbiEmail author
  • C. Cerrato
  • B. Bassano
  • R. Bionda
  • A. von Hardenberg
  • A. Provenzale
  • G. Bogliani


The current loss of biodiversity requires long-term monitoring of the distribution of living organisms, particularly in regions, such as mountains, which are highly sensitive to climatic and environmental changes. In 2007, three alpine parks in N-W Italy started a field program to determine the factors which influence animal biodiversity and identify the most appropriate methods for periodically repeatable monitoring. Twelve altitudinal transects (from montane to alpine belt) were chosen, each composed of 4–7 sampling units, for a total of 69 monitored plots. In each station, five taxonomic groups (carabids, butterflies, spiders, staphylinids, birds) were systematically sampled and topographic, environmental and micro-climatic variables were recorded. The aim was to assess the distribution of different taxa along altitudinal gradients and the relative influence of geographical, environmental and climatic factors. The data showed that species richness and community composition of invertebrates are mainly determined by altitude and microclimatic conditions, whereas birds are more sensitive to habitat structure. For invertebrates, the strong relationship with temperature suggests their potential sensitivity to climatic variations. The analysis of biodiversity patterns across vegetation belts indicated that the alpine belt hosts few species but a high percentage of endemic and vulnerable species, highlighting its importance for conservation purposes. This work offers a representative sample of the northwestern Italian Alps and it is a first step of a monitoring effort that will be repeated every five years to highlight the response of alpine biodiversity to climate and land-use changes.


Animal diversity Altitudinal gradient Climate sensitivity Community composition Temperature 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

42974_2013_14010018_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (647 kb)
Supplementary material, approximately 663 KB.


  1. Anderson, M.J. and P. Legendre. 1999. An empirical comparison of permutation methods for tests of partial regression coefficients in a linear model. J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 62: 271–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, M.J., T.O. Crist, J.M. Chase et al. 2011. Navigating the multiple meanings of beta diversity: a roadmap for the practicing ecologist. Ecol. Lett. 14:19–28.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Archaux, F. 2004. Breeding upwards when climate is becoming warmer: no bird response in the French Alps. Ibis 146: 138–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashe, J.S. 2007. Aleocharinae. Version April 2007. In: The Tree of Life Web Project, Scholar
  5. Auer, I., R. Böhm, A. Jurkovic A et al. 2007. HISTALP – Historical instrumental climatological surface time series of the greater alpine region 1760–2003. Int. J. Climatol. 27: 17–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bässler, C., J. Müller, T. Hothorn, T. Kneib, F. Badeck and F. Dziock. 2010. Estimation of the extinction risk for high-montane species as a consequence of global warming and assessment of their suitability as cross-taxon indicators. Ecol. Indic. 10: 341–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Becker, A. and H. Bugmann. 2001. Global Change and Mountain Regions. The Mountain Research Initiative. IGBP Report 49, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  8. Beniston, M. 2003. Climatic change in mountain regions: a review of possible impacts. Climatic Change 59: 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beniston, M. 2006. Mountain weather and climate. A general overview and a focus on climatic change in the Alps. Hydrobiologia 562: 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bhattarai, K.R., O.R. Vetaas and J. Grytnes. 2004. Fern species richness along a central Himalayan elevational gradient, Nepal. J. Biogeogr. 31: 389–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bibby, C.J., N.D. Burgess and D.A. Hill. 1992. Bird Census Techniques. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  12. Boggs, C.L. and D.D. Murphy. 1997. Community composition in mountain ecosystems: climatic determinants of montane butterfly distributions. Global. Ecol. Biogeogr. Lett. 6: 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bonnet, E. and Y. Van de Peer. 2002. zt: a software tool for simple and partial Mantel tests. J. Stat. Soft. 7: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Borcard, D., P. Legendre and P. Drapeau. 1992. Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 73: 1045–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Borcard, D., F. Gillet and P. Legendre. 2011. Numerical Ecology with R. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brambilla, M., F. Casale, F. Bergero, G. Bogliani, M. Crovetto, R. Falco, M. Roati and I. Negri. 2010. Glorious past, uncertain present, bad future? Assessing effects of land-use changes on habitat suitability for a threatened farmland bird species. Biol. Conserv. 143: 2770–2778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brehm, J., J. Homeier and K. Fiedler. 2003. Beta diversity of geometrid moths (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) in an Andean montane rainforest. Divers. Distrib. 9: 351–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Butchart, S.H.M., M. Walpole, B. Collen, A. van Strien et al. 2010. Global Biodiversity: Indicators of Recent Declines. Science 328: 1164–1168.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Chao, A., R.L. Chazdon, R.K. Colwell and T.J. Shen. 2005. Abundance-based similarity indices and their estimation when there are unseen species in samples. Biometrics 62: 361–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chemini, C. and A. Rizzoli. 2003. Land use change and biodiversity conservation in the Alps. J. Mt. Ecol. 7: 1–7.Google Scholar
  21. Chiarucci, A., G. Bacaro, D. Rocchini and L. Fattorini. 2008. Quantifying plant species diversity in a Natura 2000 network: Old ideas and new proposals. Biol. Conserv. 141: 2608–2618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Colwell, R.K. 2005. EstimateS: Statistical Estimation of Species Richness and Shared Species from Samples. Version 8.0. User’s guide and application published at: http://viceroy.eeb.uconn. edu/estimates/Google Scholar
  23. Davison, A.C. and D.V. Hinkley. 1997. Bootstrap Methods and their Application. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Diaz, H.F., M. Grosejeanan and L. Graumlich. 2003. Climate variability and change in high elevation regions: past, present and future. Climatic Change 59: 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dirnböck, T., F. Essl and W. Rabitsch. 2011. Disproportional risk for habitat loss of high-altitude endemic species under climate change. Glob. Change Biol. 17: 990–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. EEA - European Environment Agency. 2010. Assessing Biodiversity in Europe - The 2010 Report. EEA, Copenaghen.Google Scholar
  27. Fleishman, E., G.T. Austin and A.D. Weiss. 1998. An empirical test of Rapoport’s rule: elevational gradients in montane butterfly communities. Ecology 79: 2482–2493.Google Scholar
  28. Fu, C., X. Hua, J. Li, Z. Chang, Z. Pu and J. Chen. 2006. Elevational patterns of frog species richness and endemic richness in the Hengduan Mountains, China: geometric constraints, area and climate effects. Ecography 29: 919–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gobbi, M., B. Rossaro, A. Vater, F. De Bernardi, M. Pelfini, P. Brandmayr. 2007. Environmental features influencing Carabid beetle (Coleoptera) assemblages along a recently deglaciated area in the Alpine region. Ecol. Entomol. 32: 282–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gotelli, N.J. and R.K. Colwell. 2001. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol. Lett. 4: 379–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Grabherr, G., L. Nagy, D.B.A. Thompson and C. Körner. 2003. Overview: an outline of Europe’s alpine areas. In: L. Nagy, G. Grabherr, C. Körner and D.B.A. Thompson (eds.). Alpine Biodiversity in Europe - A Europe-wide Assessment of Biological Richness and Change. Ecol. Stu. 167: 3–12. Springer, Heidelberg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Grandchamp, A.C., A. Bergamini, S. Stofer, J. Niemela, P. Duelli and C. Scheidegger. 2005. The influence of grassland management on ground beetles (Carabidae, Coleoptera) in Swiss montane meadows. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 110: 307–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Grytnes, J.A. 2003. Species-Richness Patterns of Vascular Plants along Seven Altitudinal Transects in Norway. Ecography 26: 291–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Guisan, A., J. Holten, R. Spichiger and L. Tessier. 1995. Potential Impacts of Climate Change on Ecosystems in the Alps and Fen-noscandian Mountains. Annex Report to the IPCC Working Group II Second Assessment Report. Publication Series of the Geneva Conservatory and Botanical Gardens, University of Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  35. Guisan, A. and N.E. Zimmermann. 2000. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol. Model. 135: 147–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hannah, L., G.F. Midgley and D. Millar. 2002. Climate change-integrated conservation strategies. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 11: 485– 495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hassal, C., D.J. Thompson, G.C. French and I.F. Harvey. 2007. Historical changes in the phenology of British Odonata are related to climate. Glob. Change Biol. 13: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hodkinson, I.D. 2005. Terrestrial insects along elevation gradients: species and community responses to altitude. Biol. Rev. 80: 489–513.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Hooge, P. N. and B. Eichenlaub. 2000. Animal Movement Extension to ArcView. ver. 2.0. Alaska Science Center - Biological Science Office, U.S. Geological Survey, Anchorage, AK, USA.Google Scholar
  40. Huber, U., M. Reasoner and H. Bugmann. 2005. Global Change and Mountain Regions: An Overview of Current Knowledge. Adv. Glob. Change Res. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Huey, R.B. and R.D. Stevenson. 1979. Integrating thermal physiology and ecology of ectotherms: Discussion of approaches. Am. Zool. 19: 357–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jankowski, J.E., A.L. Ciecka, N.Y. Meyer and K.N. Rabenold. 2009. Beta diversity along environmental gradients: implications of habitat specialization in tropical montane landscapes. J. Anim. Ecol. 78: 315–327.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Kessler, M.S., K. Herzog, T. Fjeldsai and K. Bach. 2001. Species richness and endemism of plant and bird communities along two gradients of elevation, humidity and land use in the Bolivian Andes. Biodivers. Distrib. 7: 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kessler, M. 2002. The elevational gradient of Andean plant ende-mism: varying influences of taxon-specific traits and topography at different taxonomic levels. J. Biogeogr. 29: 1159–1165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Körner, C. 1999. Alpine Plant Life: Functional Plant Ecology of High Mountain Ecosystems. Springer, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Körner, C. 2000. Why are there global gradients in species richness? Mountains may hold the answer. TREE 15: 513.Google Scholar
  47. Körner, C., J. Paulsen and E. Spehn. 2011. A definition of mountains and their bioclimatic belts for global comparisons of biodiversity data. Alp. Bot. 121: 73–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Krauss, J., I. Steffan-Dewenter, T. Tscharntke. 2003. How does landscape context contribute to effects of habitat fragmentation on diversity and population density of butterflies? J. Biogeogr. 30: 889–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Legendre, P. and L. Legendre. 2012. Numerical Ecology. 3rd English Edition. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  50. Lomolino, J.W. 2001. Elevation gradients of species-density: historical and prospective views. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 10: 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lindenmayer, D.B. and G.E. Likens. 2010. Effective Ecological Monitoring. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Australia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Magurran, A.E., S.R. Baillie, S.T. Buckland, J.M. Dick, D.A. Elston, E.M. Scott, R.L. Smith, P.J. Somerfield and A.D. Wat. 2010. Long-term datasets in biodiversity research and monitoring: assessing change in ecological communities through time. TREE 25: 574–582.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Manne, L.L. and S.L. Pimm. 2001. Beyond eight forms of rarity: which species are threatened and which will be next? Animal. Conserv. 4: 221–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mantel, N. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized detection approach. Cancer Res. 27: 209–220.Google Scholar
  55. Marini, L., R. Bommarco, P. Fontana and A. Battisti. 2010. Disentangling effects of habitat diversity and area on orthopteran species with contrasting mobility. Biol. Conserv. 143: 2164–2171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. McGeoch, M.A., P.C. Le Roux, A.E. Hugo and S.L. Chown. 2006. Species and community responses to short-term climate manipulation: microarthropods in the sub-Antarctic. Austral. Ecol. 31: 719–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. McNeely, J.A. 1990. Climate change and biological diversity: policy implications. In: M.M. Boer and R.S. de Groot (eds). Landscape-ecological Impact of Climatic Change. IOS Press, Amsterdam, Washington, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  58. Oksanen, J., F.G. Blanchet, R. Kindt, P. Legendre, P.R. Minchin, R.B. O’Hara, G.L. Simpson, P. Solymos, M.H.H. Stevens and H. Wagner. 2012. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.0–5.Google Scholar
  59. Oliver, T., D.B. Roy, J.K. Hill, T. Brereton and C.D. Thomas. 2010. Heterogeneous landscapes promote population stability. Ecol. Lett. 13: 473–484.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Oommen, M.A. and K. Shanker. 2005. Elevational species richness patterns emerge from multiple local mechanisms in Himalayan woody plants. Ecology 86: 3039–3047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Orme, C.D.L., R.G. Davies, M. Burgess and F. Eigenbrod. 2005. Global hotspots of species richness are not congruent with ende-mism or threat. Nature 436: 1016–1019.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Palmer, M.W. 2007. Ordination Methods for Ecologists - An overview. Scholar
  63. Parmesan, C. 2006. Ecological and Evolutionary Responses to Recent Climate Change. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Sys. 37: 637–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Patthey, P., S. Wirthner, N. Signorell and R. Arlettaz. 2008. Impact of outdoor winter sports on the abundance of a key indicator species of alpine ecosystems. J. Appl. Ecol. 45: 1704–1711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pauchard, A., C. Kueffer, H. Dietz, C.C. Daehler et al. 2009. Ain’t no mountain high enough: plant invasions reaching new elevations. Front. Ecol. Environ. 7: 479–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Pauli, H., M. Gottfried, D. Hohenwallner, K. Reiter, R. Casale and G. Grabherr. 2004. The GLORIA Field Manual. Multi-summit Approach. DG Research, EUR 21213, Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  67. Pauli, H., M. Gottfried, K. Reiter, C. Klettner and G. Grabherr. 2007. Signals of range expansions and contractions of vascular plants in the high Alps: observations (1994–2004) at the GLORIA*master site Schrankogel, Tyrol, Austria. Glob. Change Biol. 13: 147–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Peres-Neto, P.R., P. Legendre, S. Dray and D. Borcard. 2006. Variation partitioning of species data matrices: estimation and comparison of fractions. Ecology 87: 2614–2625.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  69. Pollard, E. 1977. A method for assessing changes in the abundance of butterflies. Biol. Conserv. 12: 115–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Popy, S., L. Bordignon and R. Prodon. 2010. A weak upward eleva-tional shift in the distributions of breeding birds in the Italian Alps. J. Biogeogr. 37: 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. R Core Team. 2012. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
  72. Rahbek, C. 1995. The elevational gradient of species richness: a uniform pattern? Ecography 18: 200–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Raufaste, N. and F. Rousset. 2001. Are partial mantel tests adequate? Evolution 55: 1703–1705.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  74. Rebetez, M. and M. Reinhard. 2008. Monthly air temperature trends in Switzerland 1901–2000 and 1975–2004. Theor. Appl. Clima-tol. 91: 27–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Rice, W.R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43: 223–225.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  76. Rickart, E.A. 2001. Elevational diversity gradients, biogeography, and the structure of montane mammal communities in the inter-mountain region of North America. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 10: 77–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Samu, F., P. Csontos and C. Szinetár. 2008. From multi-criteria approach to simple protocol: Assessing habitat patches for conservation value using species rarity. Biol. Conserv. 141: 1310–1320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sánchez-Cordero, V. 2001. Elevation gradients of diversity for rodents and bats in Oaxaca, Mexico. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 10: 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Schmitt, T. 2009. Biogeographical and evolutionary importance of the European high mountain systems. Front. Zool. 6: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Smouse, P.E., J.C. Long and R.R. Sokal. 1986. Multiple regression and correlation extensions of the Mantel test of matrix correspondence. Syst. Zool. 35: 727–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Theurillat, J.P. and A. Guisan. 2001. Potential impact of climate change on vegetation in the European Alps: a review. Climatic Change 50: 77–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Theurillat, J.P., A. Schlüssel, P. Geissler, A. Guisan, C. Velluti and L. Wiget. 2003. Vascular plant and bryophyte diversity along elevational gradients in the Alps. In: L. Nagy, G. Grabherr, C. Körner and D.B.A. Thompson (eds). Alpine Biodiversity in Europe. Springer, Berlin, Germany, pp 185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Thomas, C.D., A. Cameron, R.E. Green, M. Bakkenes M et al. 2004. Extinction risk for climate change. Nature 427: 145–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Thuiller, W., S. Lavorel, M.B. Araújo, M.T. Sykes and I.C. Prentic. 2005. Climate change threats to plant diversity in Europe. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102: 8245–8250.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  85. Tuomisto, H. and K. Ruokolainen. 2008. Analyzing or explaining beta diversity? Reply. Ecology 89: 3244–3256.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  86. Venables, W.N. and B.D. Ripley. 2000. Modern Applied Statistics with S, 4th ed. New York, Springer.Google Scholar
  87. Vetaas, O. R. and J.A. Grytnes. 2002. Distribution of vascular plant species richness and endemic richness along the Himalayan elevation gradient in Nepal. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 11: 291–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Weibull, A., J. Bengtsson and E. Nohlgren. 2000. Diversity of butterflies in the agricultural landscape: the role of farming system and landscape heterogeneity. Ecography 23: 743–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Wilson, R.J., D. Gutierrez, J. Gutierrez and V.J. Montserrat. 2007. An elevational shift in butterfly species richness and composition accompanying recent climate change. Glob. Change Biol. 13: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Yoccoz, N.G., J.D. Nichols and T. Boulinier. 2001. Monitoring of biological diversity in space and time. TREE 16: 446–453.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2013

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Viterbi
    • 1
    Email author
  • C. Cerrato
    • 2
  • B. Bassano
    • 1
  • R. Bionda
    • 3
  • A. von Hardenberg
    • 1
  • A. Provenzale
    • 2
  • G. Bogliani
    • 4
  1. 1.Alpine Wildlife Research CentreGran Paradiso National ParkTorinoItaly
  2. 2.Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and ClimateTorinoItaly
  3. 3.Alpe Veglia e Devero - Alta Valle Antrona Natural ParksVarzo (VB)Italy
  4. 4.University of PaviaDSTA Department of Earth and Environmental SciencesPaviaItaly

Personalised recommendations