Comparison of methods to estimate soil seed banks: the role of seed size and mass

Abstract

There are two main methods for estimating seed density and species composition of soil seed banks: manual seed extraction and seedling emergence. These methods were used to determine and compare seed density and species composition in the soil of a natural grassland in Patagonia. Additionally, known amounts of seeds of different sizes from Patagonian grassland species were mixed with soil to evaluate the efficiency of the seed extraction method, and determine their recovery percentage. Seed density found in the grassland soil with the extraction method was four times higher than that found with the seedling emergence method. Through the use of these two methods, there was very little overlap found in species composition. Small seeds (< 1 mm) were only found with the seedling emergence method, whereas the seeds of species with specific germination requirements were found with the seed extraction method. Seed recovery of grassland species varied from 2.5% for smaller seeds (Erophila verna) to 100% for larger seeds (Rumex acetosella) with the seed extraction method. This method was more effective in detecting seeds of large-seeded species. Discrepancies in seed detection between both methods may be related to seed dormancy, specific germination requirements, seed size and mass. These two methods are necessary to describe seed density and seed bank composition.

References

  1. Ball, D.A. and S.D. Miller. 1989. A comparison of techniques for estimation of arable soil seedbanks and their relationship to weed flora. Weed Res. 29:365–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baskin, C.C. and J.M. Baskin. 1998. Seed Ecology, Biogeography and Evolution of Dormancy and Germination. Academic Press, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bernhardt, K.G., M. Koch, M. Kropf, E. Ulbel and J. Webhofer. 2008. Comparison of two methods characterizing the seed bank of amphibious plants in submerged sediments. Aquatic Bot. 88:171–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Borza, J.K., P.R. Westerman and M. Liebman. 2007. Comparing estimates of seed viability in three foxtail (Setaria) species using the imbibed seed crush test with and without additional tetra-zolium testing. Weed Technology 21:518–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown, D. 1992. Estimating the composition of a forest seed bank: a comparison of the seed extraction and seedling emergence methods. Can. J. Bot. 70:1063–1612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Correa, M.N. 1969–1999. Flora patagónica. Varios Volúmenes, Colección Cíentfica INTA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

    Google Scholar 

  7. de Villiers, A. J., M.W. Van Rooyen and G.K. Theran. 1994. Comparison of two methods for estimating the size of the viable seed bank of two plant communities in the Strandveld of the west coast, South Africa. South Afr. J. Bot. 60:81–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ferrandis, P., J.M. Herranz and J.J. Martínez-Sánchez. 1999. Fire impact on a maquis soil seed bank in Cabañeros National Park (Central Spain). Israel J. Plant Sci. 47:17–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ghermandi, L. 1992. Caracterización del banco de semillas de una estepa en el noroeste de la Patagonia. Ecol. Austral. 2:39–46.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ghermandi, L. and S. Gonzalez. 2009. Diversity and functional groups dynamics affected by drought and fire in Patagonian grasslands. Ecoscience 16:408–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gonzalez, S. and L. Ghermandi. 2008. Postfire seed bank dynamics on semiarid grasslands. Plant Ecol. 199:175–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gonzalez, S., J. Franzese and L. Ghermandi. 2010. Role of fire on Patagonian grasslands: changes in aboveground vegetation and soil seed bank. In: M. Haider and T. Müller (eds.), Advances in Environmental Research. Vol. II. Nova Science Publishers, Hauppauge, NY. pp. 243–264.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gross, K.L. 1984. Effects of seed size and growth form on seedling establishment of six monocarpic perennial plants. J. Ecol. 72:369–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gross, K.L. 1990. A comparison of methods for estimating soil seed banks. J. Ecol. 78:1079–1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gross, K.L. and K.A. Renner. 1989. A new method for estimating seed numbers in the soil. Weed Sci. 37:836–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ishikawa-Goto, M. and S. Tsuyusaki. 2004. Methods of estimating seed banks with reference to long-term seed burial. J. Plant Res. 117:245–248.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Leck, M.A., K.P. Parker and R.L. Simpson. 1989.The Ecology of Soil Seed Banks. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Malone, C.R. 1967. A rapid method for enumeration of viable seeds in soil. Weeds 15:381–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Manders, P.T. 1990. Soil seed banks and post-fire seed deposition across a forest-fynbos ecotone in the Cape Province. J. Veg. Sci. 1:491–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mesgaran, M.B., H.R. Mashhadi, E. Zand and H.M. Alizadeh. 2007. Comparison of three methodologies for efficient seed extraction in studies of soil weed seedbanks. Weed Res. 47:472–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Plue, J., K. Thompson, K. Verheyen and M. Hermy. 2012. Seed banking in ancient forest species: why total sampled area really matters. Seed Sci. Res. 22:123–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Price, J.N., B.D. Wright, C.L. Gross and W.R.D.B. Whalley. 2010. Comparison of seedling emergence and seed extraction for estimating the composition of soil seed banks. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2:151–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Roberts, H.A. 1981. Seedbanks in soil. Adv. Appl. Biol. 6:1–55.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Thompson, K. and J.P Grime. 1979. Seasonal variation in the seed banks of herbaceous species in ten contrasting habitats. J. Ecol. 67: 893–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tsuyuzaki, S. 1994. Rapid seed extraction from soils by a flotation method.. Weed Res. 34: 433–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Warr, S.J., K. Thompson and M. Kent. 1993. Seed banks as a neglected area of biogeographic research: a review of literature and sampling techniques. Progr. Phys. Geogr. 17:329–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. L. Gonzalez.

Rights and permissions

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gonzalez, S.L., Ghermandi, L. Comparison of methods to estimate soil seed banks: the role of seed size and mass. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 13, 238–242 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.13.2012.2.14

Download citation

Keywords

  • Grasslands
  • Method effectiveness
  • Seedling emergence method
  • Seed extraction method
  • Seed mass

Nomenclature

  • Correa (1969–1999)