Hypothesising that competition is a major ecological factor that filters plants on the basis of traits, we tested whether competition intensity and importance were better explained by the functional structure of communities than by standing biomass. We re-analysed data of three experiments in which one to four species of phytometers have been transplanted with or without vegetation in communities displaying a range of standing biomass. Changes in performance of phytometers among communities were used to assess competition intensity and importance. The functional structure of each community was characterized by the mean and functional divergence of plant height, a trait significantly related to resource depletion by competition. Relationships between competition components and standing biomass or functional structure of communities were calculated for each experiment. Competition importance was explained more significantly by the mean of plant height than by the standing biomass of communities. When the range of functional diversity was large enough, the importance of competition was high in communities with low functional diversity because of similarity in functioning among highly competitive plants, and low in more diverse communities. Competition intensity generally showed lower or no relationship with standing biomass or functional structure of communities. These results confirm the dependence of competition on functional structure of communities.
Community-level Weighted Mean; FDiv–Functional Divergence; RGR–Relative Growth Rate
Bernard, C. 2008. Flore des causses. Bulletin de la Société Botanique du Centre-Ouest: 1–784.
Bertness, M.D. and R.M. Callaway. 1994. The role of positive forces in natural communities: A post-cold war perspective. Trends Ecol. Evol. 144: 363–372.
Brooker, R.W. and Z. Kikvidze. 2008. Importance: An overlooked concept in plant interaction research. J. Ecol. 96: 703–708.
Brooker, R.W., Z. Kikvidze, F.I. Pugnaire, R.M. Callaway, P. Choler, C.J. Lortie and R. Michalet. 2005. The importance of importance. Oikos 109: 63–70.
Cahill, J.F. 1999. Fertilization effects on interactions between above-and belowground competition in an old field. Ecology 80: 466– 480.
Corcket, E., P. Liancourt, R.M. Callaway and R. Michalet. 2003. The relative importance of competition for two dominant grass species as affected by environmental manipulations in the field. Ecoscience 10: 186–194.
Damgaard, C. and A. Fayolle. 2009. Measuring the importance of competition: A new formulation of the problem. J. Ecol. 98: 1–6.
Falster, D.S. and M. Westoby. 2003. Leaf size and angle vary widely across species: What consequecnes for light interception? New Phytol. 158: 509–525.
Fayolle, A. 2008. Structure des communautés de plantes herbacées sur les grands causses: Stratégies fonctionnelles des espèces et interactions interspécifiques, Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier.
Freckleton, R.P., A.R. Watkinson and M. Rees. 2009. Measuring the importance of competition in plant communities. J. Ecol. 97: 379–384.
Garnier, E., G. Laurent, A. Bellmann, S. Debain, P. Berthelier, B. Ducout, C. Roumet and M.-L. Navas. 2001. Consistency of species ranking based on functional leaf traits. New Phytol. 152: 153–173.
Garnier, E. and M.L. Navas. 2011. A trait-based approach to comparative functional plant ecology: Concepts, methods and applications for agroecology. A review. Agronomy and Sustainable Development, In Press. 10.1007/sl3593-011-0036-y
Gaudet, C.L. and P.A. Keddy. 1988. A comparative approach to predicting competitive ability from plant traits. Nature 334: 242– 243.
Goldberg, D.E. 1996. Competitive ability: Definitions, contingency and correlated traits. Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. London: Biol. Sci. 351: 1377–1385.
Goldberg, D.E., T. Rajaniemi, J. Gurevitch and A. Stewart-Oaten. 1999. Empirical approaches to quantifying interaction intensity: Competition and facilitation along productivity gradients. Ecology 80: 1118–1131.
Grace, J.B. 1991. A clarification of the debate between Grime and Tilman. Funct. Ecol. 5: 583–587.
Grace, J.B. 1993. The effects of habitat productivity on competition intensity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 8: 229–230.
Grime, J.P. 1998. Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: Immediate, filter and founder effects. J. Ecol. 86: 902–910.
Grime, J.P. 2006. Trait convergence and trait divergence in herbaceous plant communities: Mechanisms and consequences. J. Veg. Sci. 17: 255–260.
Gross, N., P. Liancourt, P. Choler, K.N. Suding and S. Lavorel. 2010. Strain and vegetation effects on local limiting resources explain the outcomes of biotic interactions. Persp. Plant Ecol.Evol. Syst. 12: 9–19.
Huston, M. and T. Smith. 1987. Plant succession: Life history and competition. Amer. Nat. 130: 168–198.
Hutchinson, G.E. 1957. Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 22: 415–427.
Kattge, J., S. Díaz, S. Lavorel, I.C. Prentice, P. Leadley, G. Bönisch, E. Gamier, M. Westoby, P.B. Reich, I.J. Wright, J.H.C. Cornelissen, C. Violle, S.P. Harrison, P.M. van Bodegom, M. Reichstein, B.J. Enquist, N.A. Soudzilovskaia, D.D. Ackerly, M. Anand, O. Atkin, M. Bahn, T.R. Baker, D. Baldocchi, R. Bekker, C.C. Blanco, B. Blonder, W.J. Bond, R. Bradstock, D.E. Bunker, F. Casanoves, J. Cavender-Bares, J.Q. Chambers, F.S. Chapin Iii, J. Chave, D. Coomes, W.K. Cornwell, J.M. Craine, B.H. Dobrin, L. Duarte, W. Durka, J. Elser, G. Esser, M. Estiarte, W.F. Fagan, J. Fang, F. Fernández-Méndez, A. Fidelis, B. Finegan, O. Flores, H. Ford, D. Frank, G.T. Freschet, N.M. Fyllas, R.V. Gallagher, W.A. Green, A.G. Gutierrez, T. Hickler, S.I. Higgins, J.G. Hodgson, A. Jalili, S. Jansen, C.A. Joly, A.J. Kerkhoff, D. Kirkup, K. Kitajima, M. Kleyer, S. Klotz, J.M.H. Knops, K. Kramer, I. Kühn, H. Kurokawa, D. Laughlin, T.D. Lee, M. Leishman, F. Lens, T. Lenz, S.L. Lewis, J. Lloyd, J. Llusia, F. Louault, S. Ma, M.D. Mahecha, P. Manning, T. Massad, B.E. Medlyn, J. Messier, A.T. Moles, S.C. Müller, K. Nadrowski, S. Naeem, Ü. Niinemets, S. Nöllert, A. Nüske, R. Ogaya, J. Oleksyn, V.G. Onipchenko, Y. Onoda, J. Ordoñez, G. Overbeck, W.A. Ozinga, S. Patiño, S. Paula, J.G. Pausas, J. Peñuelas, O.L. Phillips, V. Pillar, H. Poorter, L. Poorter, P. Poschlod, A. Prinzing, R. Proulx, A. Rammig, S. Reinsch, B. Reu, L. Sack, B. Salgado-Negret, J. Sardans, S. Shiodera, B. Shipley, A. Siefert, E. Sosinski, J.F. Soussana, E. Swaine, N. Swenson, K. Thompson, P. Thornton, M. Waldram, E. Weiher, M. White, S. White, S.J. Wright, B. Yguel, S. Zaehle, A.E. Zanne and C. Wirth. 2011. Try – a global database of plant traits. Global Change Biology: 17: 2905–2935.
Keddy, P.A. 1992. Assembly and response rules: Two goals for predictive community ecology. J. Veg. Sci. 3: 157–164.
Keddy, P. A. and B. Shipley. 1989. Competitive hierarchies in herbaceous plant communities. Oikos 54: 234–241.
Kikvidze, Z. and R. Brooker. 2010. Towards a more exact definition of the importance of competition - a reply to Freckleton et al. (2009). J. Ecol. 98: 719–724.
Lavorel, S., K. Grigulis, S. McIntyre, N.S.G. Williams, D. Garden, J. Dorrough, S. Berman, F. Quetier, A. Thebault and A. Bonis. 2008. Assessing functional diversity in the field - methodology matters ! Funct. Ecol. 22: 134–147.
Leps, J., F. de Bello, S. Lavorel and S. Berman. 2006. Quantifying and interpreting functional diversity of natural communities: Practical considerations matter. Preslia 78: 481–501.
Liancourt, P., F. Viard-Cretat and R. Michalet. 2009. Contrasting community responses to fertilization and the role of the competitive ability of dominant species. J. Veg. Sci. 20: 138–147.
McGill, B.J., B.J. Enquist, E. Weiher and M. Westoby. 2006. Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21: 178–185.
Navas, M.L. and C. Violle. 2009. Plant traits related to competition: How do they shape the functional diversity of communities? Community Ecol. 10: 131–137.
Reader, R.J., S.D. Wilson, J.W. Belcher, I. Wisheu, P.A. Keddy, D. Tilman, E.C. Morris, J.B. Grace, J.B. McGraw, H. Olff, R. Turkington, E. Klein, Y. Leung, B. Shipley, R. Vanhulst, M.E. Johansson, C. Nilsson, J. Gurevitch, K. Grigulis and B.E. Beisner. 1994. Plant competition in relation to neighbor biomass - an intercontinental study with poa pratensis. Ecology 75: 1753–1760.
Sammul, M., K. Kull, L. Oksanen and P. Veromann. 2000. Competition intensity and its importance: Results of field experiments with anthoxanthum odoratum. Oecologia 125: 18–25.
Scheffer, M. and E.H.V. Nes. 2006. Self-organized similarity, the evolutionary emergence of groups of similar species. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 6230–6235.
Schwinning, S. and J. Weiner. 1998. Mechanisms determining the degree of size asymmetry in competition among plants. Oecologia 113: 447–455.
Scurlock, J.M.O., K. Johnson and R.J. Olson. 2002. Estimating net primary productivity from grassland biomass dynamics measurements. Global Change Biology 8: 736–753.
StatSoft. 2009. Statistica v9. www.statsoft.fr.
Stubbs, W.J. and J.B. Wilson. 2004. Evidence for limiting similarity in a sand dune community. J. Ecol. 92: 557–567.
Suding, K.N. 2001. The effects of gap creation on competitive interactions: Separating changes in overall intensity from relative rankings. Oikos 94: 219–227.
TwolanStrutt, L. and P.A. Keddy. 1996. Above- and belowground competition intensity in two contrasting wetland plant communities. Ecology 77: 259–270.
Violle, C, E. Garnier, J. Lecoeur, C. Roumet, C. Podeur, A. Blanchard and M.L. Navas. 2009. Competition, traits and resource depletion in plant communities. Oecologia 160: 747–755.
Violle, C, J. Richarte and M.L. Navas. 2006. Effects of litter and standing biomass on growth and reproduction of two annual species in a mediterranean old-field. J. Ecol. 94: 196–205.
Weiher, E. and P.A. Keddy. 1995. Assembly rules, null models, and trait dispersion: New questions front old patterns. Oikos 74: 159– 164.
Weiner, J. 1990. Asymmetric competition in plant populations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 5: 360–364.
Welden, C.W. and W.L. Slauson. 1986. The intensity of competition versus its importance: An overlooked distinction and some implications. Quart. Rev. Biol. 61: 23–44.
Westoby, M. 1998. A leaf-height-seed (lhs) plant ecology strategy scheme. Plant and Soil 199: 213–227.
Wilson, S.D. and D. Tilman. 1993. Plant competition and resource availability in response to disturbance and fertilization. Ecology 74: 599–611.
Zhang, J., G. Cheng, F. Yu, N. Kraüchi and M.-H. Li. 2008. Intensity and importance of competition for a grass (Festuca rubra) and a legume (Trifolium pratense) vary with environmental changes. J. Integrative Plant Biol. 50: 1570–1579.
About this article
Cite this article
Navas, M.L., Fayolle, A. Competition depends more on the functional structure of plant community than on standing biomass. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 13, 21–29 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.13.2012.1.3
- Community structure
- Competition importance
- Competition intensity
- Plant height