Advertisement

Community Ecology

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 161–170 | Cite as

Short term effects of soil disinfection with metham sodium and organic alternatives on nematode communities

  • G. Boutsis
  • G. P. Stamou
  • M. D. ArgyropoulouEmail author
Article

Abstract

Nematode communities are valuable bioindicators of soil disturbance induced by agricultural practices. We report the results of a short term experiment set on a field previously cultivated with shell beans, where different agricultural practices were applied, namely disinfection with chemicals or organic alternatives (neem, basil, marigold and clove oils). We provide a detailed description of the soil nematode community before and after the application of agricultural practices, in terms of trophic structure, nematode functional indices and diversity. We also employ network analysis techniques to analyze the structure of nematode assemblages on the basis of co-occurrence of genera in samples. Chemical disinfection had a direct lethal effect on all nematode genera reducing or even eliminating their populations, while organic amendments favored only the free living nematodes without affecting plant feeders. These differences were poorly reflected on changes of diversity and even less on those of nematode indices. Network analysis offered significant insights into the structural changes in the web of interactions among nematode genera. The network after chemical disinfection was smaller, poorly connected and almost entirely dependent on the dominant phytoparasite Paratylenchus. In the absence of chemicals, large and more complex networks were formed

Keywords

Channel index Chemical disinfection Enrichment index Essential oils Maturity index Neem Network analysis Plant parasitic index Rényi’s diversity Tillage 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akhtar, M. 1998. Biological control of plant-parasitic nematodes by neem products in agricultural soil. Appl. Soil Ecol. 7: 219–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akhtar, M. 2000. Nematicidal potential of the neem tree (Azadirachta indica A. Juss.). Integr. Pest Manage. Rev. 5: 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akhtar, M. and I. Mahmood. 1994. Potentiality of phytochemicals in nematode control: A review. Biores. Tech. 48: 189–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Akhtar, M. and I. Mahmood. 1996. Control of plant-parasitic nematodes with organic and inorganic amendments in agricultural soil. Appl. Soil Ecol. 4: 243–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Akhtar, M. and A. Malik. 2000. Roles of organic soil amendments and soil organisms in the biological control of plant-parasitic nematodes: a review. Biores. Tech. 74: 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Allesina, S., A. Bodini and M. Pascual. 2009. Functional links and robustness in food webs. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 364: 1701–109.Google Scholar
  7. Arshad, M.A., B. Lowery and B. Grossman. 1996. Physical tests for monitoring soil quality. In: J.W. Doran and A.J. Jones (eds.), Methods for Assessing Soil Quality. SSSA Special Publication No. 49, USA. pp. 123–141.Google Scholar
  8. Bongers, T. 1990. The maturity index: an ecological measure of environmental disturbance based on nematode species composition. Oecologia 83: 14–19.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Bongers, T. 1994. De nematoden van Nederland. Koninklijke Nederlandse Natuurhistorische Vereniging, Utrecht.Google Scholar
  10. Bongers, T. and M. Bongers. 1998. Functional diversity of nematodes. Appl. Soil Ecol. 10: 239–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Borgatti, S.P., G. Everett and L.C. Freeman. 1999. UCINET 5.0 version 1.00, Computer manual. Natick: Analytic Technologies.Google Scholar
  12. Bouyoucos, G.J. 1962. Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analysis of soils. Agron. J. 54: 464–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cao, Z.P., Y.L. Yu, D.C. Chen and R. Dawson. 2004. Impact of soil fumigation practices on soil nematodes and microbial biomass. Pedosphere 14: 387–393.Google Scholar
  14. Collins, H.P., A. Alva, R.A. Boydston, R.L. Cochran, P.B. Hamm, A. McGuire and E. Riga. 2006. Soil microbial, fungal, and nematode responses to soil fumigation and cover crops under potato production. Biol. Fertil. Soils 42: 247–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dover, K.E., R. McSorley and K.H. Wang. 2003. Marigolds as Cover Crops. Department of Entomology & Nematology, Univ. Florida, http://agroecology.ifas.ufl.edu/marigoldsbackground.htm.Google Scholar
  16. Ettema, C.H. and T. Bongers. 1993. Characterization of nematode colonization and succession in disturbed soil using the Maturity Index. Biol. Fertil. Soils 16: 79–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ferris, H. 2010. Form and function: Metabolic footprints of nematodes in the soil food web. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 46: 97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ferris, H., Ô. Bongers and R.G.M. de Goede. 2001. A framework for soil food web diagnostics: extension of the nematode faunal analysis concept. Appl. Soil Ecol. 18: 13–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ferris, H. and M.M. Matute. 2003. Structural and functional succession in the nematode fauna of a soil food web. Appl. Soil Ecol. 23: 93–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ferris, H., R.C. Venette and K.M. Scow. 2004. Soil management to enhance bacterivore and fungivore nematode populations and their nitrogen mineralization function. Appl. Soil Ecol. 25: 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fiscus, D.A. and D.A. Neher. 2002. Distinguishing sensitivity of free-living soil nematode genera to physical and chemical disturbances. Ecol. Applic. 12: 565–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Freeman, L.C. 1979. Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks 1: 215–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Friedkin, N.E. 1991. Theoretical foundations for centrality measures. Am. J. Sociol. 96: 1478–1504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fu, S., D.C. Coleman, P.F. Hendrix and D.A. Crossley Jr. 2000. Responses of trophic groups of soil nematodes to residue application under conventional tillage and no-till regimes. Soil Biol. Biochem. 32 (11–12): 1731–1741.Google Scholar
  25. Fuller, M.M., A. Wanger and B.J. Enquist. 2008. Using network analysis to characterize forest structure. Nat. Resour. Model. 21: 225–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Giannakou, I.O. and D.G. Karpouzas. 2003. Evaluation of chemical and integrated strategies as alternatives to methyl bromide for the control of root-knot nematodes in Greece. Pest Manag. Sci. 59: 883–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gilreath, J.P., B.M. Santos, T.N. Motis, J.W. Noling, and J.M. Mirusso. 2005. Methyl bromide alternatives for nematode and Cyperus control in bell pepper (Capsicum annuum). Crop Prot. 24: 903–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hanneman, R.A. and M. Riddle. 2005. Introduction to social network methods: Centrality and power, Riverside CA: University of California, Riverside (published in digital form at http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/).
  29. Javed, N., S.R. Gowen, M.I. Haq and S.A. Anwar. 2007. Protective and curative effect of neem (Azadirachta indica) formulations on the development of root-knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica in roots of tomato plants. Crop Prot. 26: 530–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Javed, N., S.R. Gowen, M. I. Haq and F. Shahina. 2007. Systemic and persistent effect of neem formulation and root-knot nema-tode and their storage life. Crop Prot. 26: 911–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jordano, P., J. Bascompte and J.M. Olesen. 2006. The ecological consequences of complex topology and nested structure in pollination webs. In: Waser, N.M. and Ollerton, J. (eds), Plant-pollinator Interactions: From Specialization to Generalization. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. pp. 173–199.Google Scholar
  32. Jothi, G., R.S. Babu and R.G. Rajendran. 2004. Management of root lesion nematode, Pratylenchus delattrei in crossandra using oil cakes. Biores. Technol. 93: 257–259.Google Scholar
  33. Kapagianni, P.D., G. Boutsis, M.D. Argyropoulou, E.M. Papatheodorou. and G.P. Stamou. 2010. The network of interactions among soil quality variables and nematodes: short-term responses to disturbances induced by chemical and organic disinfection. Appl. Soil Ecol. 44: 67–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lenz, R. and G. Eisenbeis. 2000. Short-term effects of different till-age in a sustainable farming system on nematode community structure. Biol. Fertil. Soils 31: 237–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Liphadzi, K.B., K. Al-Khatib, C.N. Bensch, P.W. Stahlman, S.J. Dille and T. Todd. 2005. Soil microbial and nematode communities as affected by glyphosate and tillage practices in a glyphosate resistant cropping system. Weed Sci. 53: 536–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. MacArthur, R. and R. Levins. 1967. The limiting similarity convergence, and divergence of coexisting species. Am. Nat. 101(921): 377–385.Google Scholar
  37. May, R.M. 2006. Network structure and the biology of populations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21: 394–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mote, J.E. 2005. R&D ecology: using 2-mode network analysis to explore complexity in R&D environments. J. Eng. Technol. Manage. 22: 93–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Neher, D.A. 1999. Nematode community in organically and conventionally managed agricultural soils. J. Nematol. 31: 142–154.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Newman, M.E.J. 2007. The mathematics of networks. In: The New Palgrave Encyclopedia of Economics, 2nd edition, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.Google Scholar
  41. Oka, Y., S. Nacar and E. Putievsky. 2000. Nematicidal activity of essentials oils and their components againts the root-knot nematode. Phytopathology 90: 710–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pandey, R., A. Kalra, S. Tandon, N. Mehrotra, H.N. Singh and S. Kumar. 2000. Essential oil compounds as potent source of nematicidal compounds. J. Phytopathol. 148: 501–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Patil, G.P. and C. Taillie. 1979. An overview of diversity. In: Grassle, J.F., G.P. Patil, W. Smith and C. Taillie (eds), Ecological Diversity in Theory and Practice. International Cooperative Publishing House, Fairland, Maryland. pp. 3–27.Google Scholar
  44. Pen-Mouratov, S. and Y. Steinberger. 2005. Spatio-temporal dynamic heterogeneity of nematode abundance in a desert ecosystem. J. Nematol 37: 26–36.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Proulx, R.S., D.E.L. Promislow and P.C. Phillips. 2005. Network thinking in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20: 345–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rahman, L., K.Y. Chan and D.P. Heenan. 2007. Impact of tillage, stubble management and crop rotation on nematode populations in a long-term field experiment. Soil Till. Res. 95: 110–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rényi, A. 1961. On measures of entropy and information, In: Neyman, J. (ed.), Proceedings of the 4th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, vol 1. University of California Press. pp. 547–561.Google Scholar
  48. Ricotta, C. 2000. From theoretical ecology to statistical physics and back: Self similar landscape metrics as a synthesis of ecological diversity and geometrical complexity. Ecol. Model. 125: 245–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sánchez-Moreno, S., H. Ninoshima, H. Ferris and L.E. Jackson. 2006. Linking soil properties and nematode community composition: effects of soil management on soil food webs. Nematology 8(5): 703–715.Google Scholar
  50. s’Jacob, J.J. and J. van Bezooijen. 1984. A Manual for Practical Work in Nematology. Department of Nematology, Wageningen Agricultural University, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  51. Tóthmérész, B. 1995. Comparison of different methods for diversity ordering. J. Veg. Sci. 6: 283–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vokou, D. and S. Liotiri. 1999. Stimulation of soil microbial activity by essential oils. Chemecology 9: 41–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wang, K.H., R. McSorley and N. Kokalis-Burelle. 2006. Effects of cover cropping, solarization, and soil fumigation on nematode communities. Plant Soil 286: 229–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Weiss, S. and A. Lowit. 2004. Metam Sodium/Metam Potassium: The HED Chapter of the Reregistration Eligibility Decision Document (RED), U.S. EPA, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  55. Wey, T., D.I. Blumstein, W. Shen and F. Jordan. 2008. Social network analysis on animal behaviour: a promising tool for the study of sociality. Anim. Behav. 75: 333–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. WWF-Greece. 2002. Society forthe Protection of Prespa(SPP), Protection and Preservation of Natural Environment in Albania (PPNEA), Macedonian Alliance for Prespa (MAP), Strategic action plan for the sustainable development of the Prespa Park, Ag. Germanos. www.medwet.org/prespa/publications/sapen. pdf.Google Scholar
  57. Yeates, G.W. 2003. Nematodes as soil indicators: Functional and biodiversity aspects. Biol. Fertil. Soils 37: 199–210.Google Scholar
  58. Yeates, G.W., S. Bamforths, D.J. Ross, R. Tatek and G.P. Sparling. 1991. Recolonisation of methyl bromide sterilised soils under four different field conditions. Biol. Fertil. Soils 11: 181–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Yeates, G.W., T.Bongers, R.G.M, de Goede, D.W. Freckman and S.S. Georgieva. 1993. Feeding habits in nematode families and genera - an outline for soil ecologists. J. Nematol. 25(9): 315–331.Google Scholar
  60. Yeates, G.W. and H. van der Meulen. 1996. Recolonization of methyl-bromide sterilized soils by plant and soil nematodes over 52 months. Biol. Fertil. Soils 21: 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2019

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Boutsis
    • 1
  • G. P. Stamou
    • 1
  • M. D. Argyropoulou
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Zoology, School of BiologyAristotle UniversityThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations