Advertisement

Community Ecology

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 234–240 | Cite as

Assessing the effects of Carpobrotus invasion on coastal dune soils. Does the nature of the invaded habitat matter?

  • R. Santoro
  • T. Jucker
  • M. L. CarranzaEmail author
  • A. T. R. Acosta
Article

Abstract

We investigate the modifications of soil factors in Carpobrotus invaded sites by evaluating differences between non-invaded and highly invaded plots in three habitats of coastal dune ecosystems in Central Italy. Nitrogen content, organic matter content, pH and salinity were measured in three coastal habitats: shifting dunes along the shoreline with Ammophila arenaria, Crucianellion maritimae fixed beach dunes and fixed coastal dunes with Juniperus spp. Soil variables of the invaded plots were compared to non-invaded ones using two-way factorial ANOV As and post-hoc Tukey HSD tests. We found significant differences between invaded and non-invaded plots for nitrogen content, organic matter content and pH in both foredune habitats. On the other hand, no differences were revealed on fixed dunes. Thus, we found distinct responses of soil factors to Carpobrotus invasion depending on the habitat. Pioneer habitats with very poor soils are more sensitive to invasion probably because the production of litter by Carpobrotus is considerably higher than for native species. Therefore, for the establishment of efficient alien control programs of those habitats of conservation interest, it is imperative to take into account the relationship between invasive species presence and the top soil characteristics. For instance, particular attention is required in the foredune zone (pioneer habitats), where Carpobrotus invasion is more likely to affect the parameters of the soil.

Keywords

Alien species Coastal dune vegetation Impact Mediterranean Soil parameters 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acosta, A., C. Blasi and A. Stanisci. 2000. Spatial connectivity and boundary patterns in coastal dune vegetation in the Circeo National Park, Central Italy. J. Veg. Sci. 11: 149–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, P., Nelson, D.E., Yamada, S., Chmara, W., Jensen, R.G., H.J. Bohnert and H.Griffiths. 1998. Growth and development of Mesembryanthemum crystallinum (Aizoaceae). New. Phytol. 138: 171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akaike, H. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 19 (6): 716–723.Google Scholar
  4. Bartomeus, I., J. Bosch and M. Vilà. 2008. High invasive pollen transfer, yet low deposition on native stigmas in a Carpobrotus-invaded community. Ann. Bot. 102: 417–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biondi, E., Blasi, C., Burrascano, S., Casavecchia, S., Copiz, R., Del Vico, E., Galdenzi, D., Gigante, D., Lasen, C., Spampinato, G., R. Venanzoni and L. Zivkovic. 2009. Italian Interpretation Manual of the 92/43/EEC Directive habitats. MATTM. Available from http://vnr.unipg.it/habitat/
  6. Brantley, S.T. and D.R. Young. 2010. Shrub expansion stimulates soil C and N storage along a coastal soil chronosequence.Global Change Biol. 16: 2052–2061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campos, J.A., Herrera, M., I. Biurrun and J. Loidi. 2004. The role of alien plants in the natural coastal vegetation in central-northern Spain. Biodivers. Conserv. 13: 2275–2293.Google Scholar
  8. Carboni, M., R. Santoro and A. Acosta. 2010. Are some communities of the coastal dune zonation more susceptible to alien plant invasion? J. Plant Ecol. 3(2): 139–147.Google Scholar
  9. Carranza, M.L., Carboni, M., S. Feola and A. Acosta. 2010. Landscape-scale patterns of alien plant species on coastal dunes: the case of iceplant in central Italy. Appl. Veg. Sci. 13: 135–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carranza, M.L., Acosta, A., Stanisci, A., G. Pirone andG. Ciaschetti. 2008. Ecosystem classification and EU habitat distribution assessment in sandy coastal environments. Environ. Monit. Assess. 140: 99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Celesti-Grapow, L., Alessandrini, A., Arrigoni, P.V., Banfi, E., Bernardo, L., Bovio, M., Brundu G., Cagiotti, M.R., Camarda, I., Carli, E., Conti, F., Fascetti, S., Galasso, G., Gubellini, L., La Valva, V., Lucchese, F., Marchiori, S., Mazzola, P., Peccenini, S., Poldini, L., Pretto, F., Prosser, F., Siniscalco, C., Villani, M.C., Viegi, L., T. Wilhalm and C. Blasi. 2009. Inventory of the non-native flora of Italy. Plant Biosyst. 143: 386–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Conser, C. and E.F. Connor. 2009. Assessing the residual effects of Carpobrotus edulis invasion, implications for restoration. Biol. Invasions 11: 349–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Conti, F., Abbate, G., A. Alessandrini and C. Blasi. 2005. An Annotated Checklist of the Italian Vascular Flora. Roma, Palombi Editori.Google Scholar
  14. D’Antonio, C.M. and B.E. Mahall. 1991. Root profiles and competition between the invasive exotic perennial Carpobrotus edulis and two native shrubs species in California coastal scrub. Am. J. Bot. 78: 885–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dassonville, N., Vanderhoeven, S., Vanparys, V., Hayez, M., W. Gruber and P. Meerts. 2008. Impacts of alien invasive plants on soil nutrients are correlated with initial site conditions in NW Europe. Oecologia 157: 131–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dowgiallo, G. and D. Bottini. 1998. Pedological aspects of the Circeo National Park. In: A. Stanisci and S. Zerunian (eds.), Flora e vegetazione del Parco Nazionale del Circeo. Ministero per le Politiche Agricole, Sabaudia, Italia. pp. 33–46.Google Scholar
  17. European Commission. 1992. Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora. Official Journal L 206, 22/07/1992, 7–50 and its amending actsGoogle Scholar
  18. European Commission. 2007. Interpretation manual of European Union habitats, Eur 27. Available from http://ec.europa.eu/envi-ronment/nature/legislation/habitatsdirective/docs/2007_07_im.pdf
  19. Ehrenfeld, J.G. 2003. Effects of exotic plant invasions on soil nutrient cycling processes. Ecosystems 6: 503–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Forey, E., Chapelet, B., Vitasse, Y., Tilquin, M., B. Touzard and R. Michalet. 2008. The relative importance of disturbance and environmental stress at local and regional scales in French coastal sand dunes. J. Veg. Sci. 19: 493–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Isermann, M., M. Diekmann and S. Heemann. 2007. Effects of the expansion by Hippophaë rhamnoides on plant species richness in coastal dunes. Appl. Veg. Sci. 10: 33–42.Google Scholar
  22. IUCN-CMP. 2006. (The World Conservation Union - Conservation Measures Partnership) Unified classification of direct threats. Version 1.0.Google Scholar
  23. Izzi, C.F., Acosta, A., Carranza, M.L., Carboni, M., Ciaschetti, G., Conti, F., Del Vecchio, S., Di Martino, L., Frattaroli, A., G. Pirone and A. Stanisci. 2007. Il censimento della flora vascolare degli ambienti dunali costieri dell’Italia centrale. Fitosociologia 44(1): 129–137.Google Scholar
  24. Kulmatiski, A., Beard, K.H., J.R. Stevens and S.M. Cobbold. 2008. Plant–soil feedbacks: a meta-analytical review. Ecol. Lett. 11: 980–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Levine, J.M., Vilà, M., D’Antonio, C.M., Dukes, J.S., K. Grigulis and S. Lavorel. 2003. Mechanisms underlying the impacts of exotic plant invasions. P. Roy. Soc. Lond. B Bio. 270: 775–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McKinley, D.C. and J.M. Blair. 2008. Woody plant encroachment by Juniperus virginiana in a mesic native grassland promotes rapid carbon and nitrogen accrual. Ecosystems 11: 454–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Maurel, N., Salmon, S., Ponge, J., Machon, N., J. Moret and A. Muratet. 2010. Does the invasive species Reynoutria japonica have an impact on soil and flora in urban wastelands? Biol. Invasions 12: 1709–1719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., D. Sarkar and the R Core team. 2009. nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3.1–93.Google Scholar
  29. Pyšek, P., Richardson, D.M., Rejmánek, M., Webster, G.L., M. Williamson and J. Kirschner. 2004. Alien plants in checklists and floras: toward better communication between taxonomists and ecologists. Taxon 53: 131–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. R Development Core Team. 2009. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
  31. Sala, O.E., Chapin, F.S., Armesto, J.J., Berlow, E., Bloomfield, J., Dirzo, R., Huber-Sanwald, E., Huenneke, L.F., Jackson, R.B., Kinzig, A., Leemans, R., Lodge, D.M., Mooney, H.A., Oesterheld, M., LeRoy Poff, N., Sykes, M.T., Walker, B.H., M. Walker and D.H. Wall. 2000. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287: 1770–1774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stanisci, A., Acosta, A., S. Ercole and C. Blasi. 2004. Plant communities on coastal dunes in Lazio (Italy). Annali di Botanica 4: 115–128.Google Scholar
  33. Suehs, C.M., L. Affre and F. Medail. 2004. Invasion dynamics of two alien Carpobrotus (Aizoaceae) taxa on a Mediterranean island: I. Genetic diversity and introgression. Heredity 92: 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Traveset, A., E. Moragues and F. Valladares. 2008. Spreading of the invasive Carpobrotus aff. acinaciformis in Mediterranean ecosystems: The advantage of performing in different light environments. Appl. Veg. Sci. 11: 45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. van den Berg, L.J.L., Tomassen, H.B.M., J.G.M. Roelofs and R. Bobbink. 2005. Effects of nitrogen enrichment on coastal dune grassland: a mesocosm study. Environ. Pollut. 138: 77–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. van der Heijden, M.G.A., S. Verkade and S.J. de Bruin. 2008. Mycorrhizal fungi reduce the negative effects of nitrogen enrichment on plant community structure in dune grassland. Glob. Change Biol. 14: 2626–2635.Google Scholar
  37. Vilà, M., Tessier, M., Suehs, C.M., Brundu, G., Carta, L., Galanidis, A., Lambdon, P., Manca, M., Médail, F., Moragues, E., Traveset, A., A.Y. Toumbis and P.E. Hulme. 2006. Local and regional assessments of the impacts of plant invaders on vegetation structure and soil properties of Mediterranean islands. J. Biogeogr. 33: 853–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vitousek, P.M., D’Antonio, C.M., Loope, L.L., M. Rejmánek and R. Westbrooks. 1997. Introduced species: a significant component of human-caused global change. New Zeal. J. Ecol. 21: 1–16.Google Scholar
  39. Vivrette, N.J. and C.H. Muller. 1977. Mechanism of invasion and dominance of coastal grassland by Mesembryanthemum crystallinum. Ecol. Monogr. 47: 301–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Weber, E. 2005. Invasive Plant Species of the World. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
  41. Wisura, W. and H.F. Glen. 1993. The South African species of Carpobrotus (Mesembryanthema-Aizoaceae). Contributions to the Bolus Herbarium 15: 76–107.Google Scholar
  42. Wolkovich, E.M., T.B. Douglas and A.H. David. 2009. Complex responses to invasive grass litter by ground arthropods in a Mediterranean scrub ecosystem. Oecologia 161: 697–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2019

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Santoro
    • 1
  • T. Jucker
    • 1
  • M. L. Carranza
    • 2
    Email author
  • A. T. R. Acosta
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Biologia AmbientaleUniversità degli Studi di Roma TreRomaItaly
  2. 2.EnviX-Lab. Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie per l’Ambiente e il TerritorioUniversità degli Studi del Molise -C.da Fonte LapponePesche (IS)Italy

Personalised recommendations