Advertisement

Community Ecology

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 58–66 | Cite as

Small-mammal community structure in a South American deciduous Atlantic Forest

  • G. L. Melo
  • J. Sponchiado
  • A. F. Machado
  • N. C. Cáceres
Article
First Online:

Abstract

We investigated how the small-mammal community is structured in a deciduous forest in southern Brazil, analysing the patterns of vertical and horizontal distribution. We used 12 transect lines, with 180 live-traps distributed on the ground and in the understory, and 12 pitfall traps in total. During six field sessions, we captured 510 individuals belonging to 12 small-mammal species. The combination of different methods of capture resulted in a relative high species richness for the area, although the presence of additional species cannot be ruled out. The forest complexity plays an important role allowing the coexistence of cursorial, scansorial and some arboreal species in this community. The structural variables, liana and bamboo, were the most important ones for species richness. However, the dominant species, Akodon montensis was associated to sites with dense vegetation at ground level such as ferns, bamboos, and shrubs.

Keywords

Environmental complexity Habitat selection Heterogeneity Species diversity Vertical stratification 

Abbreviation

PET

Parque Estadual do Turvo

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. August, P. V. 1983. The role of habitat complexity and heterogeneity in structuring tropical mammal communities. Ecology 64: 1495– 1513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ayres, M., M. J. Ayres, D. L. Ayres and A. S. Santos. 2005. BioEstat 4.0: Aplicações estatísticas nas áreas das Ciências Biológicas e Biomédicas. 4th ed. Sociedade Civil Mamirauá/CNPq, MCT, Imprensa Oficial do Estado do Pará, Belém.Google Scholar
  3. Bonaventura, S. M., V. Pancotto, N. Madanes and R. Vicari. 2003. Microhabitat use and density of sigmodontine rodents in Spartina densiflora freshwater marshes, Argentina. Mammalia 67:367–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonvicino, C. R., S. M. Lindbergh and L. S. Maroja. 2002. Small non-flying mammals from conserved and altered areas of Atlantic Forest and Cerrado: comments on their potential use for monitoring environment. Braz. J. Biol. 62: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brannon, M. P. 2000. Niche relationships of two syntopic species of shrews, Sorex fumeus and S. cinereus, in the southern Appalachian mountains. J. Mammal. 81: 1053–1061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cáceres, N. C. 2004. Occurrence of Conepatus chinga (Molina) (Mammalia, Carnivora, Mustelidae) and other terrestrial mammals in the Serra do Mar, Parana, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 21: 577–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cáceres, N. C. and A. P. Carmignotto. 2006. Caluromys lanatus. Mammalian Species 803: 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cáceres, N. C., R. P. Napoli, J. Casella and W. Hannibal. 2010. Mammals in a fragmented savannah landscape in south-western Brazil. J. Nat. Hist. 44: 491–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cáceres, N. C., R. P. Napoli and W. Hannibal. 2011. Differential trapping success for small mammals using pitfall and standard cage traps in a woodland savannah region of south-western Brazil. Mammalia 75: 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cademartori, C. V., M. E. Fabián and J. O. Menegheti. 2004. Variações na abundância de roedores (Rodentia, Sigmodonti-nae) em duas áreas de Floresta Ombrófila Mista, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoociências 6: 147–167.Google Scholar
  11. Cademartori, C. V., R. V. Marques, S. M. Pacheco, L. R. M. Baptista and M. Garcia. 2002. Roedores ocorrentes em Floresta Om-brófila Mista (São Francisco de Paula, Rio Grande do Sul) e a caracterização do seu habitat. Comunicações do Museu de Ciên-cias e Tecnologia - PUCRS - Série Zoologia 15: 61–86.Google Scholar
  12. Cherem, J. J. 2005. Registros de mamíferos não voadores em estudos de avaliação ambiental no sul do Brasil. Biotemas 18: 169–202.Google Scholar
  13. Colwell, R. K. 2005. EstimateS: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 7.5. Available at: https://doi.org/viceroy.eeb.unconn.edu/estimates.
  14. Dalmagro, A. D. and E. M. Vieira. 2005. Patterns of habitat utilization of small rodents in an area of Araucaria forest in Southern Brazil. Austr. Ecol. 30: 353–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dickman, C. R. and D. P. Woodside. 1983. A test of a competition model with reference to three species of small mammals in south-eastern Australia. Oecologia 60: 127–134CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Dueser, R. D. and H. H Shugart, Jr. 1978. Microhabitats in a Forest-Floor Small Mammal Fauna. Ecology 59: 89–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eccard, J. A. and H. Ylölen. 2003. Interspecific competition in small rodents: from populations to individuals. Evol. Ecol. 17: 423– 440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fa, J. E., F. J. Romero and J. Lopez-Paniagua. 1992. Habitat use by Parapatric Rabbits in a Mexican High-Altitude Grassland System. J. Appl. Ecol. 29: 357–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fontúrbel, F. E. 2010. A methodological approach to assess the small mammal community diversity in the temperate rainforest of Patagonia. Mammal. Biol. 75: 294–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gambalemoke, M., I. Mukinzi, D. Amundala, G. Katuala, J. Kennis, A. Dudu, R. Hutterer, P. Barrière, H. Leirs and E. Verheyen. 2008. Shrew trap efficiency: experience from primary forest, secondary fallow land and old palm plantation in the Congo River basin Democratic Republic of Congo. Mammalia 72: 203– 212.Google Scholar
  21. Gannon, W. L., R. S. Sikes and the Animal Care and Use Committee of the American Society of Mammalogists. 2007. Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research. J. Mammal. 88: 809–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gentile, R. and F. A. S. Fernandez. 1999. Influence of habitat structure on a streamside small mammal community in a Brazilian rural area. Mammalia 63: 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Graipel, M. E., J. J. Cherem, E. E. Monteiro-Filho and L. Glock. 2006. Dinâmica populacional de marsupiais e roedores no Par-que Municipal da Lagoa do Peri, Ilha de Santa Catarina, sul do Brasil. Mastozoología Neotropical 13: 31–49.Google Scholar
  24. Grelle, C. E. V. 2003. Forest structure and vertical stratification of small mammals in a secondary Atlantic Forest, South-eastern Brazil. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment 38: 81– 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hammer, Ø., D. A. T. Harper and P. D. Ryan. 2001. PAST: Paleon-tological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4:9 p.Google Scholar
  26. Hannibal, W. and N. C., Cáceres. 2010. Use of vertical space by small mammals in gallery forest and woodland savannah in south-western Brazil. Mammalia 74: 247–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jorgensen, E. E. 2004. Small mammal use of microhabitat reviewed. J. Mammal. 85: 531–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lambert, T. D., J. R. Malcolm and B. L. Zimmerman. 2005. Variation in small mammal species richness by trap height and trap type in southeastern Amazonia. J. Mammal. 86: 982–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lima, D. O., B. O. Azambuja, V. L. Camilotti and N. C. Cáceres. 2010. Small mammal community structure and microhabitat use in the austral boundary of the Atlantic Forest, Brazil. Zoologia 27: 99–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lyons, S. K. and M. R. Willig. 2002. Species richness, latitude, and scale-sensitivity. Ecology 83: 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lyra-Jorge, M. C. and V. R. Pivello. 2001. Combining live trap and pitfall to survey terrestrial small mammals in savanna and forest habitats, in Brazil. Mammalia 65: 524–530.Google Scholar
  32. Malcolm, J. R. 1991. Comparative abundances of Neotropical small mammals by trap height. J. Mammal. 72: 188–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Malcolm, J. R. 1995. Forest structure and the abundance and diversity of Neotropical small mammals. In: M. D. Lowman and N. M. Nadkarni (eds.), Forest Canopies. Academic Press, San Diego. pp. 179–197.Google Scholar
  34. MMA (Ministério do Meio Ambiente). 2000. Avaliação e ações pri-oritárias para a conservação da biodiversidade da Mata Atlân-tica e Campos sulinos. Secretaria de Biodiversidade e Florestas (SBF), Ministério do Meio Ambiente (MMA), Brasília.Google Scholar
  35. Murúa, R., R. A. González. 1982. Microhabitat selection in two Chilean cricetid rodents. Oecologia 52: 12–15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Myers, N., R. A. Mittermeier, C. G. Mittermeier, G. A. B. Fonseca and J. Kent. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853–858.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Nicolas, V. and M. Colyn. 2006. Relative efficiency of three types of small mammal traps in an African rainforest. Belg. J. Zool. 136: 107–111.Google Scholar
  38. Pardini, R. 2004. Effects of forest fragmentation on small mammals in an Atlantic Forest landscape. Biodivers. Conserv. 13: 2567– 2586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pardini, R. and F. Umetsu. 2006. Pequenos mamíferos não-voadores da Reserva Florestal do Morro Grande – distribuição das espécies e da diversidade em uma área de Mata Atlântica. Biota Neotropica 6: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pardini, R., S. M. Souza, R. Braga-Neto and J.P. Metzger. 2005. The role of forest structure, fragments size and corridors in maintaining small mammal abundance and diversity in an Atlantic forest landscape. Biol. Conserv. 124: 253–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pillar, V. P. 2006. MULTIV, Multivariate exploratory analysis, randomization testing and bootstrap resampling. User’s guide v. 24. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre.Google Scholar
  42. Reis, N. R., A. L. Peracchi, W. A. Pedro and I. P. Lima. 2006. Mamíferos do Brasil. Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Lon-drina.Google Scholar
  43. Seagle, W. 1985. Competition and Coexistence of Small Mammals in an East Tennessee Pine Plantation. Amer. Midland Nat. 114: 272–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shanker, K. 2001. The role of competition and habitat in structuring small mammal communities in a tropical montane ecosystem in southern India. J. Zool. 253: 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Silva, C. P.J. K. F. Mähler Jr., S. B. Marcuzzo and S. Ferreira. 2005. Plano de Manejo do Parque Estadual do Turvo. Secretaria do Meio Ambiente, Porto Alegre.Google Scholar
  46. Simonetti, J. A. 1989. Microhabitat use by small mammals in central Chile. Oikos 56: 309–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stevens, R. D. and J. S. Tello 2009. Micro- and macrohabitat associations in Mojave desert rodent communities. J. Mammal. 90: 388–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Talamoni, S. A. and M. M. Dias. 1999. Population and community ecology of small mammals in southeastern Brazil. Mammalia 63: 167–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Umetsu, F., L. Nashara and R. Pardini. 2006. Evaluating the efficiency of pitfall traps for sampling small mammals in the Neo-tropics. J. Mammal. 4: 757–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vernes, K. 2003. Fine-scale habitat preferences andhabitat partitioning by three mycophagous mammals in tropical wet sclerophyll forest, North-Eastern Australia. Austr. Ecol. 28: 471–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vieira, E. M. and E. L. A. Monteiro-Filho. 2003. Vertical stratification of small mammals in the Atlantic rain forest of south-eastern Brazil. J. Trop. Ecol. 19: 501–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Voss, R. S. and L. H. Emmons. 1996. Mammalian diversity in Neotropical lowland rainforest: a preliminary assessment. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. 230: 1–115.Google Scholar
  53. Voss, R. S., D. P. Lunde and S. A. Jansa, 2005. On the contents of Gracilinanus Gardner & Creighton, 1989, with the description of a previously unrecognized clade of small didelphid marsupials. American Museum Novitates 3482: 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Weksler, M., A. R. Percequillo andR. S. Voss. 2006. Tennew genera of Oryzomyine rodents (Cricetidae: Sigmodontinae). American Museum Novitates 3537: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wells, K., M. Pfeiffer, M. B. Lakim and K. E. Linsenmair. 2004. Use of arboreal and terrestrial space by a small mammal community in a tropical rain forest in Borneo, Malaysia. J. Biogeogr. 31: 641–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Williams, S. E., H. Marsh and J. Winter. 2002. Spatial scale, species diversity, and habitat structure: small mammals in Australian tropical rain forest. Ecology 83: 1317–1329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wilson, D. E. and D. M. Reeder. 2005. Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. 3rd ed. Johns Hopkins University. Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  58. Yahner, R. H. 1982. Microhabitat use by small mammals in farmstead shelterbelts. J. Mammal. 63: 440–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2011

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. L. Melo
    • 1
  • J. Sponchiado
    • 2
  • A. F. Machado
    • 3
  • N. C. Cáceres
    • 3
  1. 1.Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Conservação, CCBSUniversidade Federal do Mato Grosso do SulCampo Grande, MSBrazil
  2. 2.Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade Animal, CCNEUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaCamobi, Santa Maria, RSBrazil
  3. 3.Laboratório de Ecologia e Biogeografia, Departamento de BiologiaUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaCamobi, Santa Maria, RSBrazil

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options