In Europe, epiphytic lichens are incorporated in forest diversity monitoring projects in which sampling at the tree level is carried out on 4 grids on the 4 cardinal points (N, S, E, W) of the trunk. Our results, based on the analysis of a dataset referring to six forest sites in NE-Italy and including 264 trees, indicate that a lichen assessment based on sampling at the tree level less than four cardinal points might be effective in estimating species richness across different forest types, showing very high rates of species capture. Similar results were achieved if the reduction of sampling effort is applied to the number of trees sampled within each area. This effect can be explained taking into account the redundant information collected on the same tree. In the framework of forest monitoring programs, the main perspective of our results is related to the possibility of investing saved resources for improving lichen inventories by including in the surveys currently neglected microhabitats. Further studies would be welcome to identify an optimal balance between sampling effort and information gathered, as economic resources are often a constraint to activate and maintain large-scale and long-term monitoring projects.
“Paneveggio” sampling area
“Renon” sampling area
“Danta di Cadore” sampling area
“Cansiglio” sampling area
“Monticolo” sampling area
“Celarda” sampling area
Asta, J., W. Erhardt, M. Ferretti, F. Fornasier, U. Kirschbaum, P.L. Nimis,W. Purvis, S. Pirintsos, C. Scheidegger, C. Van Haluwyn and V. Wirth. 2002. Mapping lichen diversity as an indicator of environmental quality. In: P.L. Nimis, C. Scheidegger and P.A. Wolseley (eds.), Monitoring with Lichens - Monitoring Lichens. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 273–279.
Bacaro, G. and C. Ricotta. 2007. A spatially explicit measure of beta diversity. Community Ecol. 8: 41–46.
Baffetta, F., G. Bacaro, L. Fattorini, D. Rocchini and A. Chiarucci. 2007. Multi-stage cluster sampling for estimating average species richness at different spatial grains. Community Ecol. 8: 119–127.
Bergamini, A., C. Scheidegger, S. Stofer, P. Carvalho, S. Davey, M. Dietrich, F. Dubs, E. Farkas, U. Groner, K. Kärkkäinen, C. Keller, L. Lökös, S. Lommi, C. Máguas, R. Mitchell, P. Pinho, V.J. Rico, G. Aragón, A.M. Truscott, P. Wolseley, and A. Watt. 2005. Performance of macrolichens and lichen genera as indicators of lichen species richness and composition. Conserv. Biol. 19: 1051–1062.
Berryman, S. and B. McCune. 2006. Epiphytic lichens along gradients in topography and stand structure in western Oregon, USA. Pac. Northwest Fun. 1: 1–38.
Brin, A., C. Meredieu, D. Piou, H. Brustel and H. Jactel. 2008. Changes in quantitative patterns of dead wood in maritime pine plantations over time. Forest Ecol. Manag. 256: 913–921.
Bunge, J. and M. Fitzpatrick. 1993. Estimating the number of species: a review. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 88: 364–373.
Chiarucci, A., V. De Dominicis and J.B. Wilson. 2001. Structure and floristic diversity in permanent monitoring plots in forest ecosystems of Tuscany. Forest Ecol. Manag. 141: 201–210.
Chiarucci, A., G. Bacaro, D. Rocchini and L. Fattorini. 2008. Discovering and rediscovering the sample-based rarefaction formula in ecological literature. Community Ecol. 9: 121–123.
Chiarucci, A., G. Bacaro, D. Rocchini, C. Ricotta, M.W. Palmer and S.M. Scheiner. 2009. Spatially constrained rarefaction: incorporating the autocorrelated structure of biological communities into sample-based rarefaction. Community Ecol. 10: 209–214.
Colwell, R.K. and J.A. Coddington. 1994. Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philos. T. Roy. Soc. B 345: 101–118.
De Vries, W., G.J. Reinds and E. Vel. 2003. Intensive monitoring of forest ecosystems in Europe 2: atmospheric deposition and its impact on soil solution chemistry. Forest Ecol. Manag. 174: 97–115.
Fischer, R., O. Granke, G. Chirici, P. Meyer, W. Seidling, S. Stofer, P. Corona, M. Marchetti and D. Travaglini. 2009. Background, main results and conclusions from a test phase for biodiversity assessments on intensive forest monitoring plots in Europe. iForest 2: 67–74.
Fritz, Ö. 2009. Vertical distribution of epiphytic bryophytes and lichens emphasizes the importance of old beeches in conservation. Biodivers. Conserv. 18: 289–304.
Fritz, Ö., L. Gustafsson and K. Larsson. 2008. Does forest continuity matter in conservation? A study of epiphytic lichens and bryophytes in beech forests of southern Sweden. Biol. Conserv. 141: 655–668.
Giordani, P., G. Brunialti, R. Benesperi, G. Rizzi, L. Frati and P. Modenesi. 2009. Rapid biodiversity assessment in lichen diversity surveys: implications for quality assurance. J. Environ. Monitor. 11: 730–735.
Giordani, P., G. Brunialti, J. Nascimbene, E. Gottardini, F. Cristofolini, D. Isocrono, E. Matteucci and L. Paoli. 2006. Aspects of biological diversity in the CONECOFOR plots. III. Epiphytic lichens. Ann. Ist. Sper. Selv. 30 suppl. 2: 43–50.
Gotelli, N.J. and R.K. Colwell. 2001. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol. Lett. 4: 379–391.
Gustafsson, L., J. De Jong and M. Norén. 1999. Evaluation of Swedish woodland key habitats using red-listed bryophytes and lichens. Biodivers. Conserv. 8: 1101–1114.
Hortal J., P.A.V. Borges and C. Gaspar. 2006. Evaluating the performance of species richness estimators: sensitivity to sample grain size. J. Anim. Ecol. 75: 274–287.
Kinnunen, H., T. Holopainen and L. Kärenlampi. 2003. Sources of error in epiphytic lichen variables mapped as bioindicators: needs to modify the Finnish standard. Ecol. Indic. 3: 1–11.
Kobayashi, S. 1974. The species-area relation I. A model for discrete sampling. Res. Pop. Ecol. 15: 223–237.
Kremsater, L., F. Bunnell, D. Huggard and G. Dunsworth. 2003. Indicators to assess biological diversity: Weyerhaeusers coastal British Columbia forest project. Forest. Chron. 79: 590–601.
Mäkipää, R. and J. Heikkinen. 2003. Large-scale changes in abundance of terricolous bryophytes and macrolichens in Finland. J. Veg. Sci. 14: 497–508.
McCune, B. and P. Lesica. 1992. The trade-off between species capture and quantitative accuracy in ecological inventory of lichens and bryophytes in forests in Montana. The Bryologist 95: 296–304.
Nascimbene, J. 2006. Indagine lichenologica nelle aree di monitor-aggio integrato IT01-Renon e IT02-Monticolo (Alto Adige). Forest observer 2/3: 157–168.
Nascimbene, J., L. Marini and P.L. Nimis. 2007a. Influence of forest management on epiphytic lichens in a temperate beech forest of northern Italy. Forest Ecol. Manag. 247: 43–47.
Nascimbene, J., L. Marini and P.L. Nimis. 2008. Epiphytic lichens in a riparian natural reserve of Northern Italy: species richness, composition and conservation. Plant Biosys. 142: 94–98.
Nascimbene, J., L. Marini, R. Motta and P.L. Nimis. 2009. Influence of tree age, tree size and crown structure on lichen communities in mature Alpine spruce forests. Biodivers. Conserv. 18: 1509–1522.
Nascimbene, J., P.L. Nimis and L. Marini. 2007b. Testing indicators of epiphytic lichen diversity: a case study in N Italy. Biodivers. Conserv. 16: 3377–3383.
Palmer, M.W. 1995. How should one count species. Nat. Areas J. 15: 124–135.
Policnik, H., P. Simončič and F. Batic. 2008. Monitoring air quality with lichens: a comparison between mapping in forest sites and in open areas. Environ. Pollut. 151: 395–400.
Rogers, P.C. and R.J. Ryel. 2008. Lichen community change in response to succession in aspen forests of the Rocky Mountains, USA. Forest Ecol. Manag. 256: 1760–1770.
Scheidegger, C, U. Groner, C. Keller and S. Stofer. 2002. Biodiversity assessment tools - lichens. In: P.L. Nimis, C. Scheidegger and P.A. Wolseley (eds.), Monitoring with Lichens - Monitoring Lichens. Kluwer, Dordrecht. pp. 359–365.
Stofer, S., V. Catalayud, M. Ferretti, R. Fischer, P. Giordani, C. Keller, N. Stapper and C. Scheidegger. 2003. Epiphytic lichen monitoring within the EU/ICP Forests Biodiversity Test-Phase on Level II plots. Available from: www.forestbiota.org.
Stohlgren, T.J. 2007. Measuring Plant Diversity: Lessons from the Field. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
Thormann, M.N. 2006. Lichens as indicators of forest health in Canada. Forest. Chron. 82: 335–343.
Wagner, H.H. 2003. Spatial covariance in plant communities: integrating ordination, geostatistics, and variance testing. Ecology 84: 1045–1057.
Will-Wolf, S. 2002. Monitoring regional status and trends in forest health with lichen communities: the United States Forest Service approach. In: P.L. Nimis, C. Scheidegger and P.A. Wolseley (eds.), Monitoring with Lichens - Monitoring Lichens. Kluwer, Dordrecht. pp. 353–357.
Will-Wolf, S., P.A. Esseen and P. Neitlich. 2002. Monitoring biodiversity and ecosystem function: forests. In: P.L. Nimis, C. Scheidegger and P.A. Wolseley (eds.), Monitoring with Lichens - Monitoring Lichens. Kluwer, Dordrecht. pp. 203–222.
About this article
Cite this article
Nascimbene, J., Marini, L., Bacaro, G. et al. Effect of reduction in sampling effort for monitoring epiphytic lichen diversity in forests. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 11, 250–256 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.11.2010.2.14
- Forest monitoring
- Lichen diversity
- Rarefaction curves
- Sampling efficiency
- Species richness