I consider relationships between functional feeding morphology and feeding ecology within a guild of dabbling ducks (Anas spp.) which co-occur year round. This waterfowl guild contains three ‘core’ species with typical bill morphologies and four ‘peripheral’ species which vary from the typical morphology in bill length and width or interlamellar spacing. Nearest neighbors in morphological space tend to have high ecological (dietary) overlap; i.e., similarity in morphology corresponds to similarity in ecology. Moreover, by employing Monte Carlo techniques, correlations between morphology and ecology are shown to be weaker during winter than summer, implying that species ‘overcompensate’ during winter and reduce dietary overlap even more than would be expected by similarities in bill morphology alone. Additionally, I examine morphological variation among populations of North American mallards (A. platyrhynchos) to test Roughgarden’s (1974) predictions regarding relationships between intraspecific morphological variation and interspecific competition. Specifically, morphological variation should decrease with either an increase in number of competing species or a decrease in available resources. Although populations show expected trends in bill morphology with sex (males have larger bills than females) and latitude (Bergmann’s rule), I am able to demonstrate only a weak trend in females in relationship between morphological variation and intensity of interspecific competition. Examinations of relationships between morphology and ecology should be considered during that time of year when ecological ‘crunches’ occur, as this should be when selection for different morphologies and feeding strategies occurs, although species may utilize other mechanisms (e.g., foraging behavior, habitat selection) which could mediate resource partitioning to a greater degree than would be expected solely by morphological differences.
Abbott, I, L.K. Abbott, and P.R. Grant. 1977. Comparative ecology of Galapagos ground finches (Geospiza Gould): evaluation of the importance of floristic diversity and interspecific competition. Ecol. Monogr. 47: 151–184.
American Orinthologists’ Union. 1983. Check-list of North American Birds, 6th edition, Washington, D.C., American Orinthologists’ Union.
Ankney, C.D., D.G. Dennis, L.N. Wishard, and, I.E. Seeb. 1986. Low genetic variation between black ducks and mallards. Auk 103: 701–709.
Bellrose, F.C. 1976. Ducks, Geese and Swans of North America. Stackpole Books, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, USA.
Benkman, C. W. 1993. Adaptation to single resources and the evolution of crossbill (Loxia) diversity. Ecol. Monogr. 63: 305–325.
Bethke, R. W. 1991. Seasonality and interspecific competition in waterfowl guilds: a comment. Ecology 72: 1155–1158.
Cody, M.L. 1974. Competition and the Structure of Bird Communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
DuBowy, P.J. 1987. Seasonal variation in the structure of North American waterfowl communities. PhD Dissertation, University of California, Davis, California, USA.
DuBowy, P.J. 1988. Waterfowl communities and seasonal environments: temporal variability in interspecific competition. Ecology 69: 1439–1453.
DuBowy, P.J. 1991. Seasonality and interspecific competition in waterfowl guilds: patterns and processes - a reply to Bethke. Ecology 72: 1159–1161.
DuBowy, P.J. 1996. Northern Shoveler (Anas clypeata). In: A. Poole and F. Gill (eds), The Birds of North America, No. 217. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia and American Ornithologists Union, Washington, DC.
DuBowy, P.J. 1997. Long-term foraging optimization in northern shovelers. Ecol. Model. 95: 119–132.
Feinsinger, P., R.K. Colwell, J. Terborgh, and S.B. Chaplin. 1979. Elevation and the morphology, flight energetics, and foraging ecology of tropical hummingbirds. Amer Nat. 113: 481–497.
Feinsinger, P. and L.A. Swarm. 1982. “Ecological release,” seasonal variation in food supply, and the hummingbird Amazilia tobaci on Trinidad and Tobago. Ecology 63: 1574–1587.
Fretwell, S.D. 1972. Populations in a Seasonal Environment. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Gatz, A.J. 1979. Community organization in fishes as indicated by morphological features. Ecology 60: 711–718.
Grant, P.R. and B.R. Grant. 1980. The breeding and feeding characteristics of Darwin’s finches on Isla Genovesa, Galapagos. Ecol. Monogr. 50: 381–410.
Grant, P.R., B.R. Grant, J.N.M. Smith, I.J. Abbott, and L.K. Abbott. 1976. Darwin’s finches: population variation and natural selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 73: 257–261.
Grant, P.R. and T.D. Price. 1981. Population variation in continuously varying traits as an ecological genetics problem. Amer. Zool. 21: 795–811.
Grant, P.R. and D. Schluter. 1984. Interspecific competition inferred from patterns of guild structure. In D.R. Strong, D.S. Simberloff, L.G. Abele, and A.D. Thistle (eds). Ecological Communities: Conceptual Issues and the Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA, pp. 201–233.
Green, A.J. 1998. Comparative feeding behaviour and niche organization in a Mediterranean duck community. Can. J. Zool. 76: 500–507.
Hespenheide, H.A. 1973. Ecological inferences from morphological data. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 4: 213–229.
James, F.C. 1982. The ecological morphology of birds: a review. Annales Zoologici Fennici 19: 265–275.
Karr, J.R. and F.C. James. 1975. Eco-morphological configurations and convergent evolution in species and communities. In: M.L. Cody and J.M. Diamond (eds.). Ecology and Evolution of Communities. Belknap Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, pp. 258–291.
Keast, A. 1972. Ecological opportunities and dominant families, as illustrated by the neotropical Tyrannidae (Aves). Evolutionary Biology 4: 229–277.
Koehl, M.A.R. 1996. When does morphology matter? Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27: 501–542.
Lack, D. 1974. Evolution Illustrated by Waterfowl. Harper and Row, New York, New York, USA.
Leisler, B. and E. Thaler. 1982. Differences in morphology and foraging behavior in the goldcrest Regulus regulus and firecrest R ignicapillus. Annales Zoologici Fennici 19: 277–284.
Miles, D.B. and R.E. Ricklefs. 1984. The correlation between ecology and morphology in deciduous forest passerine birds. Ecology 54: 1629–1640.
Moreno, E. and L. M. Carrascal. 1993. Leg morphology and feeding postures in four Parus species: an experimental ecomorphological approach. Ecology 74: 2037–2044.
Nudds, T.D. 1983. Niche dynamics and organization of waterfowl guilds in variable environments. Ecology 64: 319–330.
Nudds, T.D. and J.N. Bowlby. 1984. Predator-prey size relationships in North American dabbling ducks. Can. J. Zool. 62: 2002–2008.
Nudds, T.D. and R.M. Kaminski. 1984. Sexual size dimorphism in relation to resource partitioning in North American dabbling ducks. Can. J. Zool. 62: 2009–2012.
Nudds, T.D., K. Sjöberg, and P. Lundberg. 1994. Ecomorphological relationships among Palearctic dabbling ducks on Baltic coastal wetlands and a comparison with the Nearctic. Oikos 69: 295–303.
Palmer, R.S. 1976. Handbook of North American Birds, vol. 2. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Pimentel, R.A. 1979. Morphometrics. The Multivariate Analysis of Biological Data. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, Iowa, USA.
Pöysä, H. 1983. Morphology-mediated niche organization in a guild of dabbling ducks. Ornis Scandinavica 14: 317–326.
Pöysä, H. 1986a. Foraging niche shifts in multispecies dabbling duck (Anas spp.) feeding groups: harmful and beneficial interactions between species. Ornis Scandinavica 17: 333–346.
Pöysä, H. 1986b. Species composition and size of dabbling ducks (Anas spp.) feeding groups: are foraging interactions important determinants? Ornis Fennica 63: 33–41.
Ricklefs, R.E., D. Cochran, and E.R. Pianka. 1981. A morphological analysis of the structure of communities of lizards in desert habitats. Ecology 62: 1474–1483.
Ricklefs, R.E. and G.W. Cox. 1977. Morphological similarity and ecological overlap among passerine birds on St. Kitts, British West Indies. Oikos 29: 60–66.
Ricklefs, R.E. and J. Travis. 1980. A morphological approach to the study of avian community organization. Auk 97: 321–338.
Rosenberg, K.V., R.D. Ohmart, and B.W. Anderson. 1982. Community organization of riparian breeding birds: response to an annual resource peak. Auk 99: 260–274.
Rothstein, S.I. 1973. The niche-variation model - is it valid? Amer. Nat. 107: 598–620.
Roughgarden, J. 1974. Niche width: biogeographic patterns among Anolis lizard populations. Amer. Nat. 108: 429–442.
Schluter, D. and P.R. Grant. 1984. Ecological correlates of morphological evolution in a Darwin’s finch, Geospiza difficilis. Evolution 38: 856–869.
Schoener, T.W. 1974. Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science 185: 27–39.
Schoener, T.W. 1986a. Mechanistic approaches to community ecology: a new reductionism. Amer. Zool. 26: 81–106.
Schoener, T.W. 1986b. Resource partitioning. In: J. Kikkawa and D.J. Anderson (eds.). Community Ecology: Pattern and Process. Blackwell, Oxford, England.
Simberloff, D. and W. Boecklen. 1981. Santa Rosalia reconsidered: size ratios and competition. Evolution 35: 1206–1228.
Wiens, J.A. and J.T. Rotenberry. 1981. Morphological size ratios and competition in ecological communities. Amer. Nat. 117: 592–599.
About this article
Cite this article
DuBowy, P.J. Morphological correlates of community structure in North American waterfowl. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 1, 147–156 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.1.2000.2.4
- Community structure
- Dabbling ducks
- Foraging ecology
- Interspecific competition
- Intrapopulation variation
- Seasonal effects