This study investigated microhabitat relationships of terrestrial bryophytes in a subalpine forest of coastal British Columbia. Substratum affinities were characterized for dominant bryophytes. Logistic regression analysis was used to gain insight into the ecological determinants of fine scale (0.1m2) bryophyte distribution by examining the predictive relationship between bryophyte species occurrence and localized environmental conditions, as well as the coverage of other bryophytes. The predictive relationships were compared to evaluate the relative importance of environmental factors versus interspecific interactions in structuring bryophyte communities. The results indicate that bryophytes show unique responses in their relationships to environmental conditions and other bryophytes. Positive feedback appears to be an important process among terrestrial bryophytes in subalpine forests.
The accumulation of organic material present over mineral soil (Litter, Fermentation and Humus)
Carleton, T.J. 1990. Variation in terricolous bryophyte and macrolichen vegetation along primary gradients in Canadian boreal forests. J. Veg. Sci. 1: 585–594.
Carter, M.R. 1993. Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis. Lewis, New York.
Cox, J.E. and D.W. Larson. 1993. Spatial heterogeneity of vegetation and environmental factors on talus slopes of the Niagara Escarpment. Can. J. Bot. 71: 323–332.
Gauch, H.G. 1982. Multivariate Analysis in Community Ecology. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
Godfrey, J.D. 1977. The Hepaticae and Anthocerotae of Southwest British Columbia. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. British Columbia.
Hitchcock, C.L. and A. Cronquist. 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest; an illustrated manual. University of Washington Press, Seattle.
Kenkel, N.C. and G.E. Bradfield. 1986. Epiphytic vegetation on Acer macrophyllum: a multivariate study of species-habitat relationships. Vegetatio 68: 43–53.
Lawton, E. 1971. Moss Flora of the Pacific Northwest. Hattori Botanical Laboratory, Nidiman, Japan.
McAlister, S. 1995. Species interactions and substrate specificity among log-inhabiting bryophyte species. Ecology 76: 2184–2195.
Økland, R.H. 1994. Patterns of bryophyte associations at different scales in a Norwegian boreal spruce forest. J. Veg. Sci. 5: 127–138.
Peck, J.E., S.A. Acker and W.A. McKee. 1995. Autecology of mosses in coniferous forests in the central western Cascades of Oregon. Northwest Sci. 69: 184–190.
Perry, D.A., M.P. Amaranthus, J.G. Borchers, S.L. Borchers and R.E. Brainerd. 1989. Bootstrapping in ecosystems. Biosci. 39: 230–237.
Pojar, J., K. Klinka and D.A. Demarchi. 1991. Mountain Hemlock Zone. In: D. Meidinger and J. Pojar (eds.), Ecosystems of British Columbia. B.C. Ministry of Forests, Victoria.
Rambo, T.R. and P.S. Muir. 1998. Forest floor bryophytes of Pseudotsuga menziesii — Tsuga heterophylla stands in Oregon: influences of substrate and overstory. Bryologist 101: 116–130.
Rietkerk, M. and J. van de Koppel. 1997. Alternate stable states and threshold effects in semi-arid grazing systems. Oikos 79: 69–76.
Schofield, W.B. 1976. Bryophytes of British Columbia III: habitat and distributional information for selected mosses. Syesis 9: 317–354.
Schofield, W.B. 1992. Some Common Mosses of British Columbia. Royal British Columbia Museum, Victoria.
Soderstrom, L. 1993. Substrate preference in some forest bryophytes: a quantitative study. Lindbergia 18: 98–103.
Tabachnick, B.G. and L.S. Fidell. 1996. Using Multivariate Statistics. 3rd Edition. Harper-Collins, Northridge.
Trexler, J.C. and J. Travis. 1993. Nontraditional regression analyses. Ecology 74: 1629–1637.
van de Rijit, C.W.C.J, L. Hazelhoff and C.W.P.M Blom. 1996. Vegetation zonation in a former tidal area: A vegetation-type response model based on DCA and logistic regression using GIS. J. Veg. Sci. 7: 505–518
Vitt, D.H., J.E. Marsh and R.B. Bovey. 1988. Mosses and Lichens of Northwest North America. Lone Pine, Edmonton.
About this article
Cite this article
Sadler, K.D., Bradfield, G.E. Microscale distribution patterns of terrestrial bryophytes in a subalpine forest: the use of logistic regression as an interpretive tool. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 1, 57–64 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.1.2000.1.8
- Community pattern
- Logistic regression
- Multivariate analysis
- Subalpine forest