Sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) is a potential raw material for production of ethanol that on blending in petrol is expected to meet the energy demand and address the environmental issues. Well-developed hybrid technology will make the crop remunerative to the farmers. Hence, gene action and best combining female and male parents for sugar yield in sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) and the association of sugar yield with other agronomic traits was studied in 171 hybrids developed by crossing 19 female parents with nine male parents in line × tester design and evaluated during both rainy and postrainy seasons of 2006. The significant differences between the seasons for all the traits suggested that these traits are greatly influenced by the environment. The lines (female parents) ICSA 38, ICSA 479, ICSA 702, ICSA 675 and ICSA 474 and the restorers (male parents), SSV 74 and SSV 84 combined well for sugar yield during rainy season and the lines, ICSA 702, ICSA 38 and ICSA 474 and the restorers, ICSV 93046, SPV 1411 and ICSV 700 combined well during postrainy season. The magnitude of SCA variance was higher suggesting the importance of non-additive gene action in inheritance of all the traits though both additive and dominant genes controlled overall sugar yield during both the seasons. Hence, selection in early generation would be ineffective and recurrent selection with periodic intercrossing is advocated. However, breeding good combining restorer parents can fetch high sugar yield in postrainy season. There is an indication of existence of transgressive segregation for sugar yield that can be exploited. The sugar yield was weak though significantly correlated with high brix and poor grain yield during both the seasons requiring extensive crossing to improve these traits simultaneously. Keeping in view mean performance, SCA effects and heterobeltiosis, the hybrids, ICSA 474 × SSV 84, ICSA 24001 × ICSR 93046 and ICSA 474 × SPV 422 were identified promising for rainy season and the hybrids ICSA 24001 × SPV 1411 and ICSA 511 × ICSV 93046 were identified for postrainy season.
Almodares, A., Sepahi, A., Shirvani, M. 1997. Sweet sorghum cultural practices in Iran. In: Li Dajue (ed.), Proceedings of the First International Sweet Sorghum Conference, 14–19 Sep. 1997, Beijing, China Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, pp. 175–183.
Baker, R.J. 1978. Issues in diallel analysis. Crop Sci. 18:533–536.
Bakhsh, A., Arshad, M., Haqqani, A.M. 2006. Effect of genotype × environment interaction on relationship between grain yield and its components in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Pak. J. Bot. 38:683–690.
Bartlett, M.S. 1937. Some examples of statistical methods of research in agriculture and applied biology. J. Royal Stat. Soc. 4:137–170.
Duvick, D.N. 1999. Heterosis: Feeding people and protecting natural resources. In: Coors, J.S., Pandey, S. (eds), The Genetics and Exploitation of Heterosis in Crops. Am. Soc. Agr. Inc., Crop Sci. Soc. Am., Inc., Soil Sci. Soc. Am., Inc., Madison, WI, USA, pp. 19–29.
Elangovan, M., Prabhakar, P., Reddy, D.C.S. 2007. Characterization and evaluation of sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] germplasm from Karnataka, India. J. of Agric. Sci. 20:840–842.
FAO. 2004. Production Yearbook. Rome, Italy.
Hallauer, A.R., Miranda, J.B. 1981. Quantitative Genetics in Maize Breeding. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames, IA, USA.
Hariprasanna, K., Zaman, F.U., Singh, A.K., Tomar, S.M.S. 2006. Analysis of combining ability status among parents and hybrids in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Indian J. of Genet. and Plant Breed. 66:28–30.
Iqbal, M.Z., Khan, S.A. 2003. Line × Tester analysis in true seed of potato (Solanum tubersum spp tubersum). J. of Biological Sci. 3:674–680.
Krishnaveni, S., Balasubramanian, T., Sadasivam, S. 1990. Potentiality of sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) for syrup preparation and alcohol production in India. Economic Bot. 44:355–359.
Putnam, D.H., Lueschen, W.E., Kanne, B.K., Hoverstad, T.R. 1991. A comparison of sweet sorghum cultivars and maize for ethanol production. J. of Prod. Agric. 4:377–381.
Ross, W.M., Gorz, H.J., Haskins, F.A., Hookstra, G.H., Rutto, J.K., Ritter, R. 1983. Combining ability effects for forage residue traits in grain sorghum hybrids. Crop Sci. 23:97–101.
Sankarapandian, R., Ramalingam, J., Pillai, M.A., Vanniarajan, C. 1994. Heterosis and combining ability studies for juice yield related characteristics in sweet sorghum. Ann. of Agric. Res. 15:199–204.
Sarma, R.N., Bahar, B., Borah, J., Barooah, D. 2004. Genetics of rice hispa tolerance. New directions for a diverse plant. In: Proceedings for the 4th International Crop Science Congress, Brisbane, Australia, 26 September–1 October 2004. http://www.cropscience.org.au/icsc2004/poster
Singh, P., Narayanan, S.S. 1993. Biometrical Techniques in Plant Breeding. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi, India.
Tadesse, T., Tesso, T., Ejeta, G. 2008. Combining ability of introduced sorghum parental lines for major morpho-agronomic traits. J. of SAT Agric. Res. 6:1–7.
Thakur, A.K., Kholi, U.K., Joshi, A. 2004. Evaluation of diallel progeny and heterosis for yield and yield components in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill). J. of Horticultural Sci. 33:106–108.
Communicated by P.S. Baenziger
About this article
Cite this article
Sanjana Reddy, P., Reddy, B.V.S. & Srinivasa Rao, P. Genetic Analysis of Traits Contributing to Stalk Sugar Yield in Sorghum. CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS 39, 453–464 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1556/CRC.39.2011.3.15
- sweet sorghum
- sugar yield
- combining ability
- gene action
- postrainy season