Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 38, Issue 4, pp 497–505 | Cite as

Yield comparison for synthetic-derived bread wheat genotypes with different water uptake abilities under increasing soil water deficits

  • M. N. InagakiEmail author
  • M. Mori
  • M. M. Nachit


The drought stress in the rain-fed regions of West Asia and North Africa strongly depends on residual soil water available for the reproductive plant growth. The water uptake ability (i.e. water consumption per unit dry matter per day) of three synthetic-derived bread wheat genotypes, SYN-8, SYN-10 and SYN-15, and their parental variety Cham 6 were examined under controlled conditions. In addition, yield performance was compared under one artificial environment with supplemental irrigation and ten rain-fed environments at two locations over five cropping seasons. Large differences were found in water uptake ability among the four wheat genotypes; SYN-8 had the highest and SYN-10 the lowest ability. These differences were reflected in decrease of soil water content and increase of leaf temperature after irrigation. Under field conditions of supplemental irrigation, there were no significant differences in grain yield among genotypes Cham 6, SYN-8 and SYN-10; however, SYN-15 had lower grain yield due to low harvest index. Significant differences of the grain yield were found between SYN-8 and SYN-10 grown in rain-fed conditions. Lower water uptake ability was associated with higher grain yield; this speculates that intensive extraction of water from soil during vegetative growth might increase biomass production, but leave inadequate available soil moisture for reproductive growth and grain production. The balancing of water consumption by plants with stored soil moisture over the whole growing period is a major attribute of drought adaptation in these synthetic-derived wheat genotypes.


synthetic wheat soil water water uptake leaf temperature drought adaptation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Asseng, S., Ritchie, J.T., Smucker, A.J.M., Robertson, M.J. 1998. Root growth and water uptake during water deficit and recovering in wheat. Plant Soil 201:265–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Condon, A.G., Richards, R.A., Rebetzke, G.J., Farquhar, G.D. 2002. Improving intrinsic water-use efficiency and crop yield. Crop Sci. 42:122–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Condon, A.G., Richards, R.A., Rebetzke, G.J., Farquhar, G.D. 2004. Breeding for high water-use efficiency. J. Exp. Bot. 55:2447–2460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Del Blanco, I.A., Rajaram, S., Kronstad, W.E. 2001. Agronomic potentials of synthetic hexaploid wheat-derived populations. Crop Sci. 41:670–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dreccer, M.F., Borgognone, M.G., Ogbonnaya, F.C., Trethowan, R.M., Winter, B. 2007. CIMMYT-selected derived synthetic bread wheat for rainfed environments: Yield evaluation in Mexico. Field Crops Res. 100:218–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Inagaki, M.N., Valkoun, J., Nachit, M.M. 2007. Effect of soil water deficit on grain yield in synthetic bread wheat derivatives. Cereal Res. Commun. 35:1603–1608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Inagaki, M.N., Nachit, M.M. 2008. Visual monitoring of water deficit stress using infra-red thermography in wheat. In: Appels, R. et al. (eds), Proceedings of the 11th International Wheat Genetics Symposium, Brisbane, Sydney University Press, 181. (URL: Scholar
  8. Inagaki, M., Mori, M., Nachit, M.M. 2009. Effect of a strobilurin-class fungicide on water use in synthetic bread wheat genotypes grown under increasing water deficit conditions. Cereal Res. Commun. 37:513–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Marathée, J.P., Gomez-MacPherson, H. 2001. Future world supply and demand. In: Bonjean, A. P., Angus, W. J. (eds), The World Wheat Book: A History of Wheat Breeding. Lavoisier Publishing, Paris, France. pp. 1107–1116.Google Scholar
  10. Meyer, W.S., Tan, C.S., Barrs, H.D., Smith, R.C.G. 1990. Root growth and water uptake by wheat during drying of undisturbed and repacked soil in drainage lysimeters. Aust. J. Agr. Res. 41:253–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Proffitt, A.P.B., Berliner, P.R., Oosterhuis, D.M. 1985. A comparative study of root distribution and water extraction efficiency by wheat grown under high- and low-frequency irrigation. Agron. J. 77:655–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rebetzke, G.J., Chapman, S.C., McIntyre, C.L., Richards, R.A., Condon, A.G., Watt, M., van Herwaarden, A.F. 2009. Grain yield improvement in water-limited environments. In: Carver, B.F. (ed.), Wheat: Science and Trade. Wiley-Blackwell, Iowa, USA. pp. 215–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Reynolds, M.P., Rebetzke, G., Pellegrineschi, A., Trethowan, R. 2006: Drought adaptation in wheat. In: Ribaut, J.-M. (ed.), Drought Adaptation in Cereals. Food Products Press, New York, USA. pp. 401–446.Google Scholar
  14. Reynolds, M., Dreccer, F., Trethowan, R. 2007. Drought-adaptive traits derived from wheat wild relatives and landraces. J. Exp. Bot. 58:177–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Richards, R.A., Rebetzke, G.J., Condon, A.G., van Herwaadenet, A.F. 2002. Breeding opportunities for increasing the efficiency of water use and crop yield in temperate cereals. Crop Sci. 42:111–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ryan, J., Masri, S., Garabet, S., Diekmann, J., Habib, H. 1997. Soils of ICARDA’s agricultural experimental stations and sites: Climate, classification, physiological and chemical properties, and land use. ICARDA, Aleppo, 107 pp.Google Scholar
  17. Trethowan, R., van Ginkel, M. 2009. Synthetic wheat-an emerging genetic resource. In: Carver, B. F. (ed.), Wheat: Science and Trade. Wiley-Blackwell, Iowa, USA. pp. 369–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Xue, Q., Zhu, Z., Musick, J.T., Stewart, B.A., Dusek, D.A. 2003. Root growth and water uptake in winter wheat under deficit irrigation. Plant Soil 257:151–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Zhang, H., Oweis, T., Garabet, S., Pala, M. 1998. Water-use efficiency and transpiration efficiency of wheat under rain-fed conditions and supplemental irrigation in a Mediterranean-type environment. Plant Soil 201:295–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA)AleppoSyria
  2. 2.Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences (JIRCAS)Tsukuba, IbarakiJapan

Personalised recommendations