Advertisement

Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 38, Issue 3, pp 419–428 | Cite as

Effect of irrigation, nitrogen and varieties on the productivity and grain malting quality in barley

  • R. K. SharmaEmail author
  • R. P. S. Verma
Quality and Utilization

Abstract

A study was undertaken at the Directorate of Wheat Research experimental station, Karnal, India, to evaluate the effect of nitrogen (30, 60 and 90 kg/ha) and irrigation (one, two and three) on yield and grain quality traits of two and six row type malt barley genotypes. The mean grain yield significantly increased from 41.9 to 45.8 q/ha with increase in nitrogen dose from 30 to 90 kg/ha and 41.8 to 45.9 q/ha with increase in irrigations from one to three. The two and six row barleys had almost similar yield potential at higher nitrogen application and irrigation frequency but the six-row type had advantage at lower nitrogen and irrigation. Varietal effects were significant for all the traits, while N significantly affected only grain yield, spikes per unit area, 1000-grain weight and husk content. Irrigation effects were significant for bulk density, grain yield, spikes per unit area, and grains per spike. Traits like grain bulk density, proportion of bold and thin grains and husk content are mainly affected by variety and less affected by management practices.

Keywords

malt barley Hordeum vulgare grain quality irrigation and nitrogen 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Analytica-EBC IV. 1987. European Brewery Convention. Brauerei- und Getränke-Rundschau, CH-8047 Zurich (Switzerland), Sect. 3.6. p. 2, Sect. 3.9., Sect. 3.11. p. 1.Google Scholar
  2. Anonymous. 1999. Annual Progress Report of the Barley Network 1998–99. Directorate of Wheat Research, Karnal, India, Sect. 4. pp. 11–15.Google Scholar
  3. Arends, A.M., Fox, G.P., Henry, R.J., Marschke, R.J., Symons, M.H. 1995. Genetic and environmental variation in the diastatic power of Australian barley. J. Cereal Sci. 21: 63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clancy, J.A., Tillman, B.A., Pan, W.L., Ullrich, S.E. 1991. Nitrogen effects on yield and malting quality of barley genotypes under no-till. Agron. J. 83: 341–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Conry, M.J. 1995. Effect of timing of N application on the grain yield and grain quality of spring-sown malting barley. Irish J. Agric. and Food Res. 34: 25–31.Google Scholar
  6. Conry, M.J. 1997. Effect of fertilizerN on the grain yield and quality of spring malting barley. Biology and Environment: Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy — Section B. 97: 185–196.Google Scholar
  7. Cranstoun, D. 1999. Effect of Sowing and Harvest Dates, Nitrogen, PGR and Fungicide on Yield and Malting Quality of Spring Barley. HGCA Project Report No. 179, 114 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Dudas, F. 1992. Grain quality of barley cultivar Bonus under different cultural practices. Rostlinna Vyroba 38: 813–820.Google Scholar
  9. Kandera, J., Kandera, M. 1987. Effect of year and nitrogen application on the yield and quality of spring barley grain. Rostlinna Vyroba 33: 389–396.Google Scholar
  10. Kandera, M. 1991. The effect of nitrogen fertilization and seeding rate on grain yields and quality in spring barley. Vedecke Prace Vyskumneho Ustavu Rastlinnej Vyroby v Piest’anoch, obilniny strukoviny, Krmoviny. 24: 88–98.Google Scholar
  11. Malesevic, M., Drezgic, P., Starcevic, L., Spasojevic, B. 1981. Effect of increasing doses of nitrogen on yield and quality of malting barley. Zemljiste-I-Biljka 30: 183–190.Google Scholar
  12. Martin, R.J., Daly, M.J. 1993. Management of triumph barley for high yield and malting quality on light soils in Canterbury, New Zealand. New Zealand J. Crop and Hort. Sci. 21: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Misra, B.N., Verma, B.S., Singh, K.N. 1979. Effect of major nutrients (NPK) in relation to grain yield and malting quality of two row barley (Hordeum distichon L.). In: Proceedings of the First National Symposium on Barley. Feb. 24–27. AICBIP, IARI Regional Station, Karnal, India, pp. 207–214.Google Scholar
  14. Nagarajan, S., Verma, R.P.S. 2000. Barley research outlook in the millennium. In: Proceedings of the 1st National Seminar on Sustainable Development of Coarse Cereals. 7–8, February. Min. of Agriculture, Directorate of Millets Development, Jaipur, India, pp. 134–145.Google Scholar
  15. Ruffing, B.J., Westermann, D.T., Jensen, M.E. 1980. Nitrogen management for malting barley. Comm. Soil Sci. and Plant Anal. 11: 889–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Singh, K.N. 1979. Barley agronomic research — Today and tomorrow. In: Proceedings of the First National Symposium on Barley. Feb. 24–27. AICBIP, IARI Regional Station, Karnal, India, pp. 196–206.Google Scholar
  17. Verma, R.P.S., Nagarajan, S. 1996. Environmental effects on malting quality of barley in India. In: Slinkard et al. (eds), Proceedings of the VII International Barley Genetics Symposium. July 30, August 6, 1996. University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada, pp. 44–46.Google Scholar
  18. Walkley, A., Black, I.A. 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 34: 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Weston, D.T., Horsley, R.D., Schwarz, P.B. 1993. Nitrogen and planting date effects on low-protein spring barley. Agron. J. 85: 1170–1174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Directorate of Wheat ResearchKarnalIndia

Personalised recommendations