Advertisement

Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 146–153 | Cite as

Environmental effects on associations among nitrogen use efficiency traits in wheat

  • B. GorjanovićEmail author
  • M. Kraljević-Balalić
  • S. Janković
Agronomy

Abstract

Nitrogen use efficiency parameters of twelve bread wheat cultivars were studied in nine environments comprised of three nitrogen applications tested over three years. An environment-by-trait association biplot and a trait-association by environment biplot were applied to understand environmental effects on these traits and relationships among them. The following trait associations were relatively stable across environments: negative associations of straw nitrogen content vs. nitrogen remobilization efficiency, straw nitrogen content vs. nitrogen harvest index and a positive association of nitrogen remobilization efficiency vs. nitrogen harvest index. The selection of genotypes with a high nitrogen harvest index and nitrogen remobilization efficiency could be used in the development of cultivars with desired nitrogen use efficiency. A low straw nitrogen content can also be used as a reliable and cost-effective indicator in the selection of genotypes with high nitrogen use efficiency.

Keywords

wheat nitrogen use efficiency yield trait association-by-environment biplot 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andersson, A. 2005. Nitrogen redistribution in spring wheat — Root contribution, spike translocation and protein quality. PhD thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Anlap, Swiss.Google Scholar
  2. Austin, R.B., Ford, M.A., Edrich, J.A., Blackwell, R.D. 1977. The nitrogen economy of winter wheat. J. Agric. Sci. 88: 159–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barbottin, A., Lecomte, C., Bouchard, C., Jeuffroy, M-H. 2005. Nitrogen remobilization during grain filling in wheat: Genotypic and environmental effects. Crop Sci. 45: 1141–1150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brancourt-Humel, M., Doussinault, G., Lecomte, C., Berard, P., Le Buance, B., Trottet, M. 2003. Genetic improvement of agronomic traits of winter wheat cultivars released in France from 1946–1992. Crop Sci. 43: 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cox, C.M., Qualset, C.O., Rains, D.W. 1985. Genetic variation for nitrogen assimilation and translocation in wheat. I. Dry matter and nitrogen accumulation. Crop Sci. 25: 430–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cox, C.M., Qualset, C.O., Rains, D.W. 1986. Genetic variation for nitrogen assimilation and translocation in wheat. III. Nitrogen translocation in relation to grain yield and protein. Crop Sci. 26: 737–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ehdaie, B., Waines, J.G. 2001. Sowing date and nitrogen rate on dry mater and nitrogen partitioning in bread and durum wheat. Field Crops Res. 73: 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Farrer, D.C., Weisz, R., Heiniger, R., Murphy, J.P., White, J.G. 2006. Minimizing protein variability in soft red winter wheat: Impact of nitrogen application, timing and rate. Agron. J. 98: 1137–1145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fiel, B. 1997. The inverse yield-protein relationship in cereals: Possibilities and limitations for genetically improving the grain protein yield. Trends Agron. 1: 103–119.Google Scholar
  10. Fowler, D.B., Brydon, J., Darroch, B.A., Entz, M.H., Johnson, Q.M. 1990. Environment and genotype influence on grain protein concentration of wheat and rye. Agron. J. 82: 666–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Heitholt, J.J., Croy, L.I., Maness, N.O., Nguyen, H.T. 1990. Nitrogen partitioning in genotypes of winter wheat differing in grain N concentration. Field Crops Res. 23: 13–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Löffler, C.M., Rauch, T.L., Busch, R.H. 1985. Grain and plant protein relationship in hard red spring wheat. Crop Sci. 25: 521–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McKendry, A.L., McVetty, P.B.E., Evans, L.E. 1995. Selection criteria for combining hight grain yield and high grain protein concentration in bread wheat. Crop Sci. 35: 1597–1602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McMullan, P.M., McVetty, P.B.E., Urquhart, A.A. 1988. Dry matter and nitrogen accumulation and redistribution and their relationship to grain yield and grain protein in wheat. Can. J. Sci. 68: 311–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Palta, J.A., Kobata, T., Turner, N.C., Fillery, R. 1994. Remobilization of carbon and nitrogen in wheat as influenced by postanthesis water deficits. Crop Sci. 34: 118–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Przulj, N., Momcilovic, Vojislava 2001. Genetic variation for dry matter and nitrogen accumulation and translocation in two-rowed spring barley. II Nitrogen translocation. Europ. J. of Agron. 15: 255–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. R Development Core Team. 2008. An Introduction to R: Notes on R, A Programming Environment for Data Analysis and Graphics (electronic edition). http://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu
  18. Tripathi, S.C., Sayre, K.D., Kaul, J.N. 2004. Genotypic effects on yield, N uptake, NUTE and NHI of spring wheat, In: New directions for a diverse planet, Proceedings of the 4th International Crop Science Congress (26. Sep.–01. Oct. 2004, Brisbane, Australia). http://www.cropscience.org.au
  19. Van Sanford, D.A., McKown, C.T. 1987. Cultivar differences in nitrogen remobilization during grain fill in soft red winter wheat. Crop Sci. 27: 295–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Yan, W., Wallace, D.H. 1995. Breeding for negatively associated traits. Plant Breed. Rev. 13: 141–177.Google Scholar
  21. Yan, W., Tinker, N.A. 2006. Biplot analysis of multi-environment trail data: Principles and applications, Can. J. Sci. 86: 623–645.Google Scholar
  22. Yan, W., Molnar, S.J., Fregeau-Reid, J., McElroy, A., Tinker, N.A. 2007. Associations among oat traits and their responses to the environment. J. Crop Improv. 20: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Gorjanović
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. Kraljević-Balalić
    • 1
  • S. Janković
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of AgricultureNovi SadSerbia
  2. 2.Institute for Science Application in AgricultureBelgradeSerbia

Personalised recommendations