Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 37, Issue 4, pp 611–621 | Cite as

Yield and water balance of maize grown in rotation on chernozem soil

  • L. F. DókaEmail author
  • P. Pepó


Soil water balance was studied in a 25-year-old experiment, on chernozem soil, in different crop-rotation systems (mono-, bi- and triculture) in dry (2007) and rainy (2008) seasons, in maize production. Soil water deficit values in maize production were much lower in 2008 than in 2007 in non-irrigated and irrigated plots of three crop rotation systems because of favourable precipitation supply. We found difference between the water deficit values of two irrigation treatments. We measured lower values in irrigated plots of three crop-rotation systems before sowing: non-irrigated plots in monoculture 105 mm, in biculture 101 mm, in triculture 121 mm and irrigated plots in monoculture 90 mm, in biculture 91 mm, in triculture 111 mm. Soil waterstock started to decrease with the rise in average temperature and, despite an increase in precipitation quantity, we calculated higher water deficit values. Precipitation in August and the high average temperature intensified the water deficit. Water deficit showed its highest values in early September. We examined the water balance of the soil profile in 0–2.0 m and we concluded that the water deficit of the 0.8–1.2 m soil layers was most intensive in both non-irrigated and irrigated treatments, because of significant root mass. Our results showed that irrigation had a more important influence on the yield in a dry cropyear (2007 characterized by abiotic, water stress) than in an optimum water supply cropyear (2008).


long-term experiment water deficit cropyear irrigation crop rotation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bharati, V., Nandan, R., Kumar, V., Kumar, S.B. 2007. Effect of irrigation on yield, water-use efficiency and water requirement of winter maize (Zea mays) — based intercropping systems. Enviroment and Ecology. MKK Publication, Calcutta, India 25(4):888–892.Google Scholar
  2. Bradford, K.J. 1994. Water stress and the water relations of seed development: A critical review. Crop Sci. 34:1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ceská, J., Hejnák, V., Ernestová, Z., Krizková, J. 2008. The effect of soil drought on photosynthesis and transpiration rates of maize (Zea mays L.). Cereal Res. Commun. 36:823–826.Google Scholar
  4. Hnilicka, F., Hnilicková, H., Holá, D., Kocová, M., Rothová, O. 2008. The effect of soil drought on gases exchange in the leaves of maize (Zea mays L.). Cereal Res. Commun. 36:895–898.Google Scholar
  5. Jambrovic, A., Andric, L., Ledencan, T., Zdunic, Z. 2008. Soil and genotype influences on yield and nutritional status of maize hybrid parents. Cereal Res. Commun. 36:1015–1018.Google Scholar
  6. Josipovic, M., Jambrovic, A., Plavsic, H., Liovic, H., Sostaric, J. 2008. Responses of grain composition traits to high plant density in irrigated maize hybrids. Cereal Res. Commun. 36:549–552.Google Scholar
  7. Plavsic, H., Josipovic, M., Andric, L., Jambrovic, A., Sostaric, J. 2007. Influence of irrigation and fertilization on maize (Zea mays L.) properties. Cereal Res. Commun. 35:933–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institue of Crop Sciences, Agronomy Faculty, Centre of Agricultural Sciences and EngineeringUniversity of DebrecenDebrecenHungary

Personalised recommendations