Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 37, Issue 4, pp 559–565 | Cite as

Realized heritability estimates during a cyclical process of selection and intercrossing in bread wheat and hexaploid triticale

  • J. A. Isaía
  • R. H. MaichEmail author


This study was designed to compare realized heritability estimates for several traits of a selection index applied in rain fed bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and hexaploid triticale (× Triticosecale Wittmack) recurrent selection programs. The experimental material consisted in C4–C5 triticale and C7–C8 bread wheat S0 progenies selected disruptively and evaluated as S1 derived families. The selection differential (SD) and the response to selection (RS) were estimated from the S0 progenies and the S1 derived families, respectively, as the differences (in percent) between high and low (=100) selection index group mean values. In bread wheat, significant differences between groups of S1 derived families were observed in the 7th cycle for all the studied traits; while only significant differences for harvest index were observed in the 8th cycle. Taking into account only the statistically significant differences between high and low selection index group mean values, the realized heritability estimates for grain yield, biomass yield and grain number were lower (7.0% to 11.2%) than those obtained for 1000-grain weight and harvest index (12.3% to 20.5%). The narrow germplasm base in triticale generated insignificant response to selection results.


recurrent selection selection index rain fed semiarid yield 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Al Yassin, A., Grando, S., Kafawin, O., Tell, A., Ceccarelli, S. 2005. Heritability estimates in contrasting environments as influenced by the adaptation level of barley germ plasm. Ann. Appl. Biol. 147:235–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anas, T., Yoshida, T. 2004. Heritability and genetic correlation of Al-tolerance with several agronomic characters in sorghum assessed by hematoxylin staining. Plant Prod. Sci. 7:280–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arrendell, S., Wynne, J.C., Elkan, G.H., Schneeweiss, T.J. 1988. Selection among early generation peanut progeny for high and low acetylene reduction and plant weight. Plant Breeding 101:217–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Avey, D.P. 1980. Genetic control, breeding and prediction of maturity in winter wheat. PhD, Agronomy, Purdue, Indiana.Google Scholar
  5. Bänziger, M., Setimela, P.S., Hodson, D., Vivek, B. 2005. Breeding for improved abiotic stress tolerance in maize adapted to southern Africa. Agric. Water Man. 80:212–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Collins, R.P., Abberton, M.T., Michaelson-Yeates, T.P.T., Rhodes, I. 1997. Response to divergent selection for stolon characters in white clover (Trifolium repens). J. Agric. Sci 129:279–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dhliwayo, T., Pixley, K.V. 2003. Divergent selection for resistance to maize weevil in six maize populations. Crop Sci. 43:2043–2049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Di Rienzo, J., Guzmán, W.Y., Casanoves, F. 2001. A multiple comparisons method based on the distribution of the root node distance of a binary tree. J. Agric., Biol. and Env. Statistics 7:146–159.Google Scholar
  9. Fischer, K.S., Johnson, E.C., Edmeades, G.O. 1983. Breeding and selection for drought resistance in tropical maize. CIMMYT, El Batan, México.Google Scholar
  10. García del Moral, L.F., Rharrabti, Y., Villegas, D., Royo, C. 2003. Evaluation of grain yield and its components in durum wheat under mediterranean conditions: An ontogenyc approach. Agron. J. 95:266–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Glover, K.D., Scott, R.A. 1998. Heritability and phenotypic variation of tolerance to phytophthora root rot of soybean. Crop Sci. 38:1495–1500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hanson, W.D. 1991. Root characteristics associated with divergent selection for seedling aluminum tolerance in soybean. Crop Sci. 31:125–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kannenberg, L.W., Falk, D.E. 1995. Models for activation of plant genetic resources of crop breeding programs. Can. J. Plant Sci. 75:45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kulkarni, R.N., Baskaran, K., Ramesh, S. 2003. Five cycles of recurrent selection for increased essential oil content in East Indian lemongrass: Response to selection, and effects on heritabilities of traits and intertrait correlations. Plant Breeding 122:131–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lorini, I., Galley, D.J. 2000. Estimation of realized heritability of resistance of deltamethrin insecticide in selected strains of Rhyzopertha dominica (F.) (Coleoptera: Bostrychidae). J. Stored Prod. Res. 36:119–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Maich, R.H., Chaves, A.G., Coraglio, M.C., Costero, B., Torres, L.E. 2006. Agronomic performance of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and hexaploid triticale (× Triticosecale Wittmack) based on the use of a selection index. Cereal Res. Commun. 34:1123–1127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pfeiffer, W.H., Sayre, K.D., Payne, T.S. 2001. Increasing durum wheat yield potential and yield stability. In: Research Highlights of the CIMMYT Wheat Program 1999–2000. CIMMYT, pp. 17–20.Google Scholar
  18. Pinard, M.H., van Arendonk, J.A., Nieuwland, M.G., van der Zijpp, A.J. 1992. Divergent selection for immune responsiveness in chickens: Estimation of realized heritabilities with an animal model. J. Animal Sci. 70:2986–2993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Reynolds, M., Calderini, D., Condon A., Vargas, M. 2007. Association of source/sink traits with yield, biomass and radiation use efficiency among random sister lines from three wheat crosses in a high-yield environment. J. Agric. Sci. 145:3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Smart, A.J., Vogel, K.P., Moser, L.E., Stroup, W.W. 2003. Divergent selection for seedling tiller number in big bluestem and switchgrass. Crop Sci. 43:1427–1433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stino, F.K.R., Samaan, S.S., Kohtla, M.G., Mizinga, K.M., Soliman, K.F.A. 1998. Divergent selection for pentobarbital-induced sedation times in mice. Int. J. Exp. and Clin. Pharm. 56:92–100.Google Scholar
  22. Sürek, H., Beser, N. 2005. Selection for grain yield and its components in early generations in rice (Oriza sativa L.). Trakya University J. Sci. 6:51–58.Google Scholar
  23. Wiersma, J.J., Busch, R.H., Fulcher, G.G., Hareland, G.A. 2001. Recurrent selection for kernel weight in spring wheat. Crop Sci. 41:999–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Agriculture - UNC. CC 509CórdobaArgentina

Personalised recommendations