Applicability of biochemical and genetic markers in the polymorphism analysis of maize lines

Abstract

The guidelines elaborated by the Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) of the European Union for the registration and patenting of varieties and hybrids of cultivated crops are based on the triple criteria of distinctiveness, uniformity and stability (DUS). For many species, however, morphological descriptions are not sufficient for the detection of differences between varieties. Techniques that allow varieties to be identified and distinguished precisely and reliably are essential not only for variety identification, but also to protect variety ownership rights. Biochemical and molecular genetic methods have now reached a level of development that makes them suitable for this purpose, and when these are combined with conventional field observations the breeding stock can be unequivocally identified and any existing genetic diversity can be detected. The regular application of such analyses is a fundamental criterion in the case of maize, as more and more closely related hybrids are being entered for testing.

The aim of the present work was to examine how isoenzyme patterns and PCR-based genetic markers could be used in polymorphism analysis, in order to obtain information on the genetic diversity of Hungarian breeding materials. The emphasis was on finding genetic markers characteristic of individual maize varieties, rather than of maize as a species.

References

  1. Botstein, D., Hite, R.L., Skonic, M., David, R. W. 1980. Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 32:314–331.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Bretting, P.K., Goodman, M.M. 1986. Numerical taxonomic analysis of karyomorphological variation in Mexican and Central American races of maize (Zea mays ssp. mays). Am. J. Bot. 73:682–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brown, S.M., Hopkins, M.S., Mitchell, S.E., Senior, M.L., Wang, T.Y., Duncan, R.R., Gonzalez-Candelas, F., Kresovich, S. 1996. Multiple methods for the identification of polymorphic simple sequence repeats (SSRs) in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench). Theor. Appl. Genet. 93:190–198.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Camussi, A., Jellium, M.D., Ottaviano, E. 1980. Numerical taxonomy of Italian Maize populations: Fatty acid composition and morphological traits. Maydica 25:149–165.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cardy, B.J., Kannenberg, L.W. 1982. Allozymic variability among maize inbred lines and hybrids: applications for cultivar identification. Crop Sci. 22:1016–1020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dice, L.R. 1945. Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology 26:297–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dweikat, I., Ohm, H., Mackenzie, S., Patterson, F., Cambron, S., Ratcliffe, R. 1994. Association of a DNA marker with Hessian fly resistance gene H9 in wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 89:964–968.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. European Union Community Plant Variety Office. 2001. Protocol for Distinctness, Uniformity and Stability Tests. Zea mays L. (Maize). Angers, France.

  9. Gebhardt, C., Ritter, E., Barone, A., Debener, T., Walkemeier, B., Schachtschabel, U., Kaufmann, H., Thompson, R.D., Bonierbale, M.W., Ganal, M.W., Tanksley, S.D., Salamini, F. 1991. RFLP maps of potato and their alignment with the homoeologous tomato genome. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83:49–57.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gerdes, J.T., Behr, C.F., Coors, J.G., Tracy, W.F. 1994. Compilation of North American Maize Breeding Germ Plasm. Crop Science Society of America, Madison, WI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Goodman, M.M., Stuber, C.W. 1983. Races of maize. VI. Isozyme variation among races of maize in Bolivia. Maydica 28:169–187.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gyulai, G., Gémesné, J.A., Sági, Zs., Venczel, G., Pintér, P., Kristóf, Z., Törjék, O., Heszky, L., Bottka, S., Kiss, J., Zatykó, L. 2000. Doubled haploid development and PCR-analysis of F 1 hybrid derived DH-R 2 paprika (Capsicum annuum L.) lines. J. Plant Physiol. 156:168–174.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Law, J.R., Cooke, R.J., Reeves, J.C., Donini, P., Smith, J.S.C. 1999. Most similar variety comparisons as a grouping tool. Special issue: Cultivar group classification. Plant Varieties and Seeds 12:181–190.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Liu, X.Z., Peng, Z.B., Fu, J.H., Huang, C.L. 1998. Maize inbred line grouping by using cluster analysis of RAPD molecular marker, phenotype and heterosis. Acta Agriculturae Boreali Sinica 13:36–41.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Messelson, M., Yuan, R. 1968. DNA restriction enzyme from E. coli. Nature 217:1110–1114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nagy, E. 2004. Studies on polymorphism and related genetic groups in maize. Ph.D. dissertation, 115 pp.

  17. Shieh, G.J., Thseng, F.S. 2002. Genetic diversity of Tainan, white maize inbred lines and prediction of single cross hybrid performance using RAPD markers. Euphytica 124:307–313.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Smith, J.S.C., Chin, E.C.L., Shu, H., Smith, O.S., Wall, S.J., Senior, M.L., Mitchell, S.E., Kresowitch, S., Ziegl, E.J. 1997. An evaluation of the utility of SSR éoci as molecular markers in maize (Zea mays L.): Comparison with data from RFLPs and pedigree. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95:163–173.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Smith, J.S.C., Smith, O.S. 1989a. The use of morphological, biochemical, and genetic characteristics to measure distance and to test for minimum distance between inbred lines of maize (Zea mays L.). Upov Workshop, 20 pp.

  20. Smith, J.S.C., Smith, O.S. 1989b. The description and assessment of distance between inbred lines of maize: I. The use of morphological traits as descriptors. Maydica 34:141–150.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Smith, J.S.C., Smith, O.S. 1989c. The description and assessment of distances between inbred lines of maize: II. The utility of morphological, biochemical, and genetic descriptors and a scheme for the testing of distinctiveness between inbred lines. Maydica 34:151–161.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Smith, J.S.C., Smith, O.S. 1992. Measurement of genetic diversity among maize hybrids: A comparison of isozymic, RFLP, pedigree and heterosis data. Maydica 37:53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Smith, O.S., Smith, J.S.C., Bowen, S.L., Tenborg, R.A., Wall, S.J. 1990. Similarities among a group of elite maize inbreds as measured by pedigree, F1 grain yield, grain yield, heterosis, and RFLPs. Theor. Appl. Genet. 80:833–840.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Stuber, C.W., Moll, R.H. 1972. Frequency changes of isozyme alleles in a selection experiment for grain yield in maize (Zea mays L.) Crop Sci. 12:337–340.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Stuber, C.W., Wendel, J.F., Goodman, M.M., Smith, J.S.C. 1988. Techniques and scoring procedure for starch gel electrophoresis of enzymes from maize. Technical Bulletin 286:1–87.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sturtevant, E.L. 1899. Varieties of corn. USDA Off. EXP. STN. Bull. 57:1–108.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Weining, S., Langridge, P. 1991. Identification and mapping of polymorphisms in cereals based on the polymerase chain reaction. Theor. Appl. Genet. 82:209–216.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Nagy.

Rights and permissions

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nagy, E., Spitkó, T. & Marton, L.C. Applicability of biochemical and genetic markers in the polymorphism analysis of maize lines. CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS 37, 373–381 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1556/CRC.37.2009.3.6

Download citation

Keywords

  • maize
  • isoenzyme pattern
  • RAPD
  • SSR