Applicability of biochemical and genetic markers in the polymorphism analysis of maize lines
The guidelines elaborated by the Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) of the European Union for the registration and patenting of varieties and hybrids of cultivated crops are based on the triple criteria of distinctiveness, uniformity and stability (DUS). For many species, however, morphological descriptions are not sufficient for the detection of differences between varieties. Techniques that allow varieties to be identified and distinguished precisely and reliably are essential not only for variety identification, but also to protect variety ownership rights. Biochemical and molecular genetic methods have now reached a level of development that makes them suitable for this purpose, and when these are combined with conventional field observations the breeding stock can be unequivocally identified and any existing genetic diversity can be detected. The regular application of such analyses is a fundamental criterion in the case of maize, as more and more closely related hybrids are being entered for testing.
The aim of the present work was to examine how isoenzyme patterns and PCR-based genetic markers could be used in polymorphism analysis, in order to obtain information on the genetic diversity of Hungarian breeding materials. The emphasis was on finding genetic markers characteristic of individual maize varieties, rather than of maize as a species.
Keywordsmaize isoenzyme pattern RAPD SSR
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Brown, S.M., Hopkins, M.S., Mitchell, S.E., Senior, M.L., Wang, T.Y., Duncan, R.R., Gonzalez-Candelas, F., Kresovich, S. 1996. Multiple methods for the identification of polymorphic simple sequence repeats (SSRs) in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench). Theor. Appl. Genet. 93:190–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Camussi, A., Jellium, M.D., Ottaviano, E. 1980. Numerical taxonomy of Italian Maize populations: Fatty acid composition and morphological traits. Maydica 25:149–165.Google Scholar
- European Union Community Plant Variety Office. 2001. Protocol for Distinctness, Uniformity and Stability Tests. Zea mays L. (Maize). Angers, France.Google Scholar
- Gebhardt, C., Ritter, E., Barone, A., Debener, T., Walkemeier, B., Schachtschabel, U., Kaufmann, H., Thompson, R.D., Bonierbale, M.W., Ganal, M.W., Tanksley, S.D., Salamini, F. 1991. RFLP maps of potato and their alignment with the homoeologous tomato genome. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83:49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gerdes, J.T., Behr, C.F., Coors, J.G., Tracy, W.F. 1994. Compilation of North American Maize Breeding Germ Plasm. Crop Science Society of America, Madison, WI, USA.Google Scholar
- Goodman, M.M., Stuber, C.W. 1983. Races of maize. VI. Isozyme variation among races of maize in Bolivia. Maydica 28:169–187.Google Scholar
- Gyulai, G., Gémesné, J.A., Sági, Zs., Venczel, G., Pintér, P., Kristóf, Z., Törjék, O., Heszky, L., Bottka, S., Kiss, J., Zatykó, L. 2000. Doubled haploid development and PCR-analysis of F 1 hybrid derived DH-R 2 paprika (Capsicum annuum L.) lines. J. Plant Physiol. 156:168–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Law, J.R., Cooke, R.J., Reeves, J.C., Donini, P., Smith, J.S.C. 1999. Most similar variety comparisons as a grouping tool. Special issue: Cultivar group classification. Plant Varieties and Seeds 12:181–190.Google Scholar
- Liu, X.Z., Peng, Z.B., Fu, J.H., Huang, C.L. 1998. Maize inbred line grouping by using cluster analysis of RAPD molecular marker, phenotype and heterosis. Acta Agriculturae Boreali Sinica 13:36–41.Google Scholar
- Nagy, E. 2004. Studies on polymorphism and related genetic groups in maize. Ph.D. dissertation, 115 pp.Google Scholar
- Smith, J.S.C., Chin, E.C.L., Shu, H., Smith, O.S., Wall, S.J., Senior, M.L., Mitchell, S.E., Kresowitch, S., Ziegl, E.J. 1997. An evaluation of the utility of SSR éoci as molecular markers in maize (Zea mays L.): Comparison with data from RFLPs and pedigree. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95:163–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Smith, J.S.C., Smith, O.S. 1989a. The use of morphological, biochemical, and genetic characteristics to measure distance and to test for minimum distance between inbred lines of maize (Zea mays L.). Upov Workshop, 20 pp.Google Scholar
- Smith, J.S.C., Smith, O.S. 1989b. The description and assessment of distance between inbred lines of maize: I. The use of morphological traits as descriptors. Maydica 34:141–150.Google Scholar
- Smith, J.S.C., Smith, O.S. 1989c. The description and assessment of distances between inbred lines of maize: II. The utility of morphological, biochemical, and genetic descriptors and a scheme for the testing of distinctiveness between inbred lines. Maydica 34:151–161.Google Scholar
- Smith, J.S.C., Smith, O.S. 1992. Measurement of genetic diversity among maize hybrids: A comparison of isozymic, RFLP, pedigree and heterosis data. Maydica 37:53–60.Google Scholar
- Stuber, C.W., Wendel, J.F., Goodman, M.M., Smith, J.S.C. 1988. Techniques and scoring procedure for starch gel electrophoresis of enzymes from maize. Technical Bulletin 286:1–87.Google Scholar
- Sturtevant, E.L. 1899. Varieties of corn. USDA Off. EXP. STN. Bull. 57:1–108.Google Scholar