Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 37, Issue 3, pp 469–478 | Cite as

Sowing date affect spikelet number and grain yield of durum wheat

  • I. ArduiniEmail author
  • L. Ercoli
  • M. Mariotti
  • A. Masoni


Shifts in sowing date change the combination of temperature and photoperiod to which durum wheat is exposed, affecting crop phenology and grain yield. Three durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. durum) varieties were field sown at month intervals over a whole year. The number of spikelets on the main culm and the duration of the period of spikelet initiation were recorded. Grain yield, spike number, and mean kernel weight were determined, too. With all sowing dates, plants formed a spike within the main culm and reached the stage of first node detectable. Physiological maturity was achieved only for sowings performed between October and May. Grain yield was highest in November and both yield and yield components were strongly affected by sowing date. The number of spikelets ranged from 11 to 24, according to sowing date and variety. It decreased from November to May in consequence of the shorter initiation period, and we hypothesize that a 12-h-daylength or longer interrupts spikelet initiation. The decrease of spikelet number was the main determinant of yield reduction with the delay of sowing from November to March.


durum wheat grain yield sowing date spikelets Triticum turgidum L. var. durum variety yield components 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arduini, I., Masoni, A., Ercoli, L., Mariotti, M. 2006. Grain yield, and dry matter and nitrogen accumulation and remobilization in durum wheat as affected by variety and seeding rate. Eur. J. Agron. 25:309–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker, C.K., Gallagher, J.N. 1983. The development of winter wheat in the field. 1. Relation between apical development and plant morphology within and between seasons. J. Agric. Sci. 101:327–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brooking, I.R., Jamieson, P.D., Porter, J.R. 1995. The influence of daylength on final leaf number in spring wheat. Field Crops Res. 41:155–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Elhani, S., Martos, V., Rharrabti, Y., Royo, C., García del Moral, L.F. 2007. Contribution of main stem and tillers to durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. durum) grain yield and its components grown in Mediterranean environments. Field Crops Res. 103:25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ewert, F. 1996. Spikelet and floret initiation on tillers of winter triticale and winter wheat in different years and sowing dates. Field Crops Res. 47:155–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fischer, R.A., 2008. The importance of grain or kernel number in wheat: A reply to Sinclair and Jamieson. Field Crops Res. 105:15–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Friend, D.J.C. 1965. Ear length and spikelet number of wheat grown at different temperatures and light intensities. Can. J. Bot. 43:345–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. George, D.W. 1982. The growing point of fall-sown wheat: A useful measure of physiological development. Crop Sci. 22:235–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Halse, N.J., Weir, R.N. 1970. Effects of vernalization, photoperiod, and temperature on phenological development and spikelet number of Australian wheat. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 21:383–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hay, R.K.M., Kirby, E.J.M. 1991. Convergence and synchrony — a review of the coordination of development in wheat. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 42:661–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Li, C., Cao, W., Dai, T. 2001. Dynamic characteristics of floret primordium development in wheat. Field Crops Res. 71:71–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Li, F.M., Wang P., Wang J., Xu, J.Z. 2004. Effects of irrigation before sowing and plastic film mulching on yield and water uptake of spring wheat in semiarid Loess Plateau of China. Agric. Water Manage 67:77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mahdi, L., Bell, C.J., Ryan, J. 1998. Establishment and yield of wheat (Triticum turgidum L.) after early sowing at various depths in a semi-arid Mediterranean environment. Field Crops Res. 58:187–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Masoni, A., Arduini, I., Mariotti, M., Ercoli, L., Bonari, E. 2001. Number of spikelets and leaf appearance rate in durum wheat as affected by temperature, daylength and nitrogen availability. Agricol. Medit. 131:57–65.Google Scholar
  15. McMaster, G.S., Wilhelm, W.W. 1997. Growing degree-days: one equation, two interpretations. Agric. For. Meteorol. 87:291–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Miralles, D.J., Katz, S.D., Colloca, A., Slafer, G.A. 1998. Floret development in near isogenic wheat lines differing in plant height. Field Crops Res. 59:21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Miralles, D.J., Ferro, B.C., Slafer, G.A. 2001. Developmental responses to sowing date in wheat, barley and rapeseed. Ann. Bot. 71:211–223.Google Scholar
  18. Motzo, R., Giunta, F. 2007. The effect of breeding on the phenology of Italian durum wheats: from landraces to modern cultivars. Eur. J. Agron. 26:462–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Porter, J.R., Gawith, M. 1999. Temperatures and the growth and development of wheat: a review. Eur. J. Agron. 10:23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rassaa, N., Ben Haj Salah, H., Latiri, K. 2008. Thermal responses of Durum wheat Triticum durum to early water stress. Consequence on leaf and flower development. C. R. Biologies 331:363–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rawson, H.M. 1971. An upper limit for spikelet number per ear in wheat, as controlled by photoperiod. Australian J. Agric. Res. 22:537–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sinclair, T.R., Jamieson, P.D. 2006. Grain number, wheat yield, and bottling beer: An analysis. Field Crops Res. 98:60–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Slafer, G.A., Rawson, H.M. 1995. Photoperiod’temperature interactions in contrasting wheat genotypes: Time to heading and final leaf number. Field Crops Res. 44:73–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stern, W.R., Kirby, E.J.M. 1979. Primordium initiation at the shoot apex in four contrasting varieties of spring wheat in response to sowing date. J. Agric. Sci. 93:203–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zadoks, J.C., Chang, T.T., Konzak, C.F. 1974. A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res. 14:415–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Agronomia e Gestione dell’AgroecosistemaPisaItaly
  2. 2.Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna di Studi Universitari e di PerfezionamentoPisaItaly

Personalised recommendations