Advertisement

Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 37, Issue 3, pp 459–467 | Cite as

Selection studies on mutant bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) populations in Turkey

  • T. KusaksizEmail author
  • S. Dere
Breeding

Abstract

The effect of gamma irradiation on five common wheat cultivars which are all the spring cultivars, namely Gonen, Cumhuriyet, Ziyabey, Izmir and Basribey were studied. Various doses of gamma irradiation, i.e. (0-150-300 Gy) were applied to dry seed. The mutated populations were grown at two locations (Bornova and Alasehir) in the 2003–2004 and 2004–2005 growing season. A total of 100 single plants were selected from each mutant and control population in 2003–2004 growing season. Twenty-five percent selection pressure was applied. The progeny rows of the selected mutant plants were grown at two locations in 2004–2005 growing season. A second stage selection was applied in each progeny population and selected mutant lines were advanced to the micro yield testing. Genetic advance at each stage of selection was estimated for single plant yield, and expected progeny means for plot yield was estimated. In certain mutant populations, heritability and phenotypic standard deviation values, genetic gains were higher than control population. The progeny means of the certain mutant populations were higher when compared with control populations as well.

Keywords

wheat gamma ray genetic gain selection 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahloowalia, B.S., Maluszynski, M. 2001. Induced mutations — A new paradigm in plant breeding. Euphytica 118:187–204.Google Scholar
  2. Acikgöz, N., Akkaş, M.E. 1994. TARIST Database, Statistical Pocket Programme, Version: 4.01 Ege University Agricultural Faculty Bornova-İzmir.Google Scholar
  3. Allard, R.W. 1999. Principles of Plant Breeding. Second Edition. JohnWiley and Sons, New York, pp. 102–104.Google Scholar
  4. Bagnara, D., Rossi, L., Porreca, G. 1973. Mutagenesis in Triticum aestivum mutants for protein content obtained from the cultivar Capetti. Proc. of the Symp. on Genetics and Breeding aestivum wheat, Univ. di Bari, pp. 679–685.Google Scholar
  5. Borojevic, K., Borojevic, S. 1972. Mutation Breeding in Wheat Induced Mutations and Plant Improvement, IAEA, Vienna, pp. 237–251.Google Scholar
  6. Budak, N., Yildirim, M.B. 2001. Heritability, correlation and genetic gains obtained in the populations of Ege 88 and Kunduru wheat irradiated with gamma rays. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 6:19–24.Google Scholar
  7. Camargo, C.E.D.O., Neto, A.T., Filho, A.W.P.F., Felico, J.C. 2000. Genetic control of aluminium tolerance in mutant lines of the wheat cultivar Anahuac. Euphytica 114:47–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cagırgan, M.İ., Yildirim, M.B. 1989. Macro mutational variability on metric traits of barley, Akdeniz University. The Journal of Agricultural Faculty Antalya 3:139–152.Google Scholar
  9. Cetin, B., Turan, Ş. 1999. Türkiye’de Makarnalık Buǧday Üretimi ve Makarna Sanayindeki Gelişmeler. Orta Anadolu’da Hububat Tarımının Sorunlari ve Çözüm Yolları Sempozyumu. (The latest developments at macaroni sector and durum wheat production in Turkey. Symposium of problems and solution pathways of cereal agriculture at Middle Anatolia). Konya, pp. 729–733.Google Scholar
  10. Falconer, D.S., Mackay, T.F.C. 1996. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman Group Ltd, Longman House, Burnt Mill, Harlow, Essex, pp. 188–192.Google Scholar
  11. FAO/IAEA. 1997. Manual on Mutation Breeding. Technical Report Series. 2 nd edition, 119, pp. 78–79.Google Scholar
  12. FAO. 2008. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Roma. FAO Statisitcs Division. http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=567#ancorGoogle Scholar
  13. Gaul, H. 1964. Mutations in plant breeding. Radiat. Bot. 4:155–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gaul, H. 1965. The Concept of Macro and Micro Mutations and Results on Induced Micro Mutations in Barley, The Use of Induced Mutations in Plant Breeding. IAEA, Pergamon Press. Oxford, pp. 407–428.Google Scholar
  15. Gaul, H., Hesemann, C.U. 1966. Züchterische Bedeutung von Grossmutationen. I. Beispiele für die Anderung der Grannenlange von Sommergersten-Mutanten im veranderten genetischen Hintergrund (Importance of breeding macro mutation. Examples of the change of spike length of spring barley mutants with changed genetic background). Z. Pflanzenzüchtung 55:225–237.Google Scholar
  16. Gustafsson, A., Lundqvist, U., Ekman, G. 1968. Yield Analysis Repeated Mutagenic Treatment and Selection in Barley, Mutations in Plant Breeding II, IAEA, Vienna, pp. 113–128.Google Scholar
  17. Irfaq, M., Nawab, K. 2001. Effect of gamma irradiation on some morphological characteristics of three wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Cultivars. Pak. J. of Biological Sciences 1:935–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jamil, M., Khan, U. 2002. Study of genetic variation in yield components of wheat cultivar Bukhtwar-92 as induced by gamma radiation. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 1:579–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kusaksız, T. 1996. Researches on Quantitative Traits of Different Barley Bulk Populations. Ph.D Thesis. Ege University. Natural and Applied Science Institute. Department of Agronomy. İzmir, pp. 54–56.Google Scholar
  20. Kusaksız, T., Dere, S. 2008. Selection Studies on Mutant Durum Wheat (Triticum durum desf.) Populations in Turkey. Joint FAO/IAEA Programme Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture. International Symposium on Induced Mutations in Plants (ISIM), 12–15 August 2008, Vienna-Austria (IAEA-CN-167-372), Abstracts, p. 180.Google Scholar
  21. Lagoda, P.J.L. 2008. Networking and Fostering of Cooperation in Plant Mutation Genetics and breeding: role of The Joint FAO/IAEA Programme. FAO/IEAE International Symposium on Induced Mutations in Plants, 12–15 August 2008, Vienna, p. 2.Google Scholar
  22. Muthusamy, A., Vasanth, K., Jayabalan, N. 2005. Induced high yielding mutants in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Mutation Breeding Newsletter and Reviews, pp. 6–7.Google Scholar
  23. Sakin, M.A., Yildirim, A., Gokmen, S. 2005. Determining some yield and quality characteristics of mutants induced from aestivum wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivar. Turk. J. Agric. For. 29:61–67.Google Scholar
  24. Sigurbjörnsson, B. 1977. Introduction: Mutations in Plant Breeding Programs, Manual on Mutation Breeding Second Edition Tech. Report Series 119, IAEA, Vienna, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
  25. Steel, R.G.D., Torrie, J.H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. 2 nd Edn. Mc Graw Hill Book Comp., New York, pp. 26–58.Google Scholar
  26. Yildirim, M.B. 1982. Evaluation on Agricultural and Physiological Traits of Wheat Mutant Lines. Ege University, The Journal of Faculty of Agriculture, Izmir, No. 477.Google Scholar
  27. Yildirim, M.B., Cagirgan, M.İ., Turgut, İ. 1987. Arpa Mutant Popülasyonlarında Seleksiyon Uygulaması, Türkiye Tahıl Sempozyumu (Applications of Selection on Barley Mutant Populations, National Cereal Symposium). Bursa, pp. 473–487.Google Scholar
  28. Yildirim, M.B., Budak, N., Yildirim, Z., Kuşaksız, T. 2005. Selection Studies on Mutant Barley Populations. In: Datta, S.K. (ed.), Role of Classical Mutation Breeding in Crop Improvement. ISBN: 81-7035-354-8, Daya Publishing House, New Delhi, India, pp. 186–200.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Vocational College of AlasehirUniversity of Celal BayarManisaTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Agronomy, Faculty of AgricultureUniversity of OrduOrduTurkey

Personalised recommendations