Advertisement

Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 37, Issue 2, pp 269–275 | Cite as

High relative humidity affects vitreousness of durum wheat [Triticum turgidum L. var. durum (Desf)]

  • K. Sandhu
  • F. A. MantheyEmail author
  • E. M. Elias
Breeding

Abstract

Vitreousness is an important quality characteristic that affects the yield of semolina during milling of durum wheat. It has been observed that kernel vitreousness seems to be lower when durum is exposed to damp conditions just before harvest. The main objective of this research was to determine the effect of high relative humidity (RH) on kernel vitreousness of ten durum wheat cultivars. Spikes were exposed to 88% RH at room temperature for 1 and 3 days. This resulted in increased spike moisture, kernel moisture and kernel size. Vitreous kernel content (vitreousness) decreased 23.6% after spikes were exposed to high relative humidity for 3 days. Exposure to 88% RH caused the greatest decline in vitreousness with the cultivar ‘Ben’.

Keywords

durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. durumvitreousness relative humidity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Association of Cereal Chemists. 2000. Approved Methods of the AACC, 10 th ed. Method 44-15A. The Association, St Paul, MN.Google Scholar
  2. Anjum, F.M., Walker, C.E. 1991. Review on the significance of starch and protein to wheat kernel hardness. J. Sci. Food Agric. 56:1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Debbouz, A., Pitz, W.J., Moore, W.R., D’Appolonia, B.L. 1995. Effect of bleaching on durum wheat and spaghetti quality. Cereal Chem. 72:128–131.Google Scholar
  4. Dexter, J.E., Marchylo, B.A., MacGregor, A.W., Tkachuk, R. 1989. The structure and protein composition of vitreous, piebald and starchy durum wheat kernels. J. Cereal Sci. 10:19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gane, R. 1941. The water content of wheats as a function of temperature and humidity. J. Soc. Chem. Industry 60:44–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hubbard, J.E., Earle, F.R., Senti, F.R. 1957. Moisture relations in wheat and corn. Cereal Chem. 34:422–433.Google Scholar
  7. North Dakota Wheat Commission. 2004. Regional Quality Report. U.S. Northern Grown Durum Wheat. ND Wheat Commission, Bismarck, ND.Google Scholar
  8. Sharp, P.F. 1927. Wheat and flour studies, IX Density of wheat as influenced by freezing, stage of development, and moisture content. Cereal Chem. 4:14–46.Google Scholar
  9. Shuey, W.C. 1960. A wheat sizing technique for predicting flour milling yield. Cereal Sci. Today 5:71–75.Google Scholar
  10. Steel, R.G.D., Torrie, J.H. 1980. Some uses of chi-square. In: Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 469–476.Google Scholar
  11. Swanson, C.O. 1943. Effect of moisture on the physical and other properties of wheat. III. Degree, duration, and number of wetting treatments. Cereal Chem. 20:286–299.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plant SciencesNorth Dakota State UniversityFargoUSA

Personalised recommendations