Advertisement

Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 36, Issue 4, pp 591–600 | Cite as

Energy Based Approach of Local Influence of Global Climate Change in Maize Stand

  • L. Dióssy
  • A. AndaEmail author
Article

Abstract

We approximated the influence of global climate change on the energy consumption of maize by a simulation model in Keszthely, referring to the average July weather. The period of 1961–1990 was considered as the basic run. We quantified the changes of the close past on the basis of the decade between 1997 and 2006. The other 6 scenarios were elaborated on the one hand by downscaling the IPCC (2007) report (A2 and B2), on the other hand by taking into account a more serious weather change. At determining plant and soil characteristics of the individual scenarios we applied the principle of analogy being extensively used in meteorological practice; in this method we selected the values of that year from the observation data series of almost 30 years that were the closest to the year to be simulated. The ratio of latent heat decreased by 4.8% only at doubling CO2 concentration. The largest difference in the ratio of sensible and latent heat was in the case of the run containing the highest warming up and largest precipitation decrease, where the ratio of latent heat increased by 8.8%.

One of the causes of global warming is the raised CO2 concentration narrowed the stoma openings by 14.3% in itself; it is the quantified value of the positive impact of global warming on plant evaporation, referring to Keszthely. Warming up over 6 °C raised the latent heat compared to the basic run in a statistically justifiable way in the case of each scenario; according to this, in Keszthely, assuming an average July, even in the case of a temperature rise of 6 °C there are some humidity reserves that can be used for transpiration by maize plant. Precipitation loss of 30% associated with warming up of 9 °C, however, reduced this reserve to a minimum. In our opinion, water seems to be the bottleneck of the future; farmers have to prepare to face the lack of water, even in the case if nowadays the forecast of precipitation changes is rather volatile.

Keywords

sensible heat latent heat simulation model maize 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anda, A. 2006. Modeling maize response to climate modification in Hungary. Commun. Biometry Crop Sci. 1(2):90–98.Google Scholar
  2. Bartholy, J., Pongrácz, R., Gelybó, Gy. 2007. Regional climate change in Hungary for 2071–2100. Applied Ecology and Environment Research 5:1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Goudriaan, J., van Laar, H.H. 1994. Modelling Potential Crop Growth Processes. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 58–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. IPCC 2007. Summary for Policymakers. In: Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K.B., Tignor, H.L., Miller, G. (eds), Climate Change — The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I. to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 254.Google Scholar
  5. Jackson, R.B., Sala, O.E., Field, C.B., Mooney, H.A. 1994. CO2 alters water use, carbon gain, and yield for dominant species in a natural grassland. Oecologia 98:257–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Long, S.P., Answorth, E.A., Leakey, A.D.B., Donald, J.N., Ort, R. 2006. Food for thought: Lower-than-expected crop yield stimulation with rising CO2 concentrations. Science 30:1918–1921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Mika, J. 2007. Regionális éghajlati forgatókőnyvek előkészítése statisztikus módszerekkel (Preparation of climatic scenarios by using statistical methods). DSc Thesis, BudapestGoogle Scholar
  8. Mera, R.J., Niyogi, D., Buol, G.S., Wilkerson, G.G., Semazzi, F.H.M. 2006. Potential individual versus simultaneous climate change effects on soybean (C3) and maize (C4) crops: an agrotechnology model based study. Global and Planetary Change 54:163–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. STATA 5.0 (1996) Stata Corporation LP Texas, USA. Available online: www.stata.com
  10. Van de Geijn, S.C., Goudriaan, J. 1996. The effects of elevated CO2 and temperature change on transpiration and crop water use. In: Bazzaz, F., Sombroek, W. (eds), Global Climate Change and Agricultural Production. FAO and John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 101–122.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ministry of Environment and WaterBudapestHungary
  2. 2.Georgikon Faculty of AgronomyUniversity of PannoniaKeszthelyHungary

Personalised recommendations