Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 36, Issue 4, pp 611–622 | Cite as

Effect of Precipitation and Fertilization on the Changes in Soil Organic Carbon (SOC)

  • L. MártonEmail author


The present study aimed to determine the effect of precipitation and fertilization (NPKCaMg) on the changes in soil organic carbon (SOC) in a long-term field experiment set up in Nyírlugos (Nyírség region, Hungary: N: 47° 41′ 60″ and E: 22° 2′ 80″) on a Haplic Luvisol with popular rotation crops. Over the 40 year period, from 1962 to 2002, SOC pool values ranged between 2.32 and 3.36 mg·kg−1. On the untreated control plots the values remained nearly constant (3.31 mg·kg−1: ±0.29 mg·kg−1 and 0.52 mg·kg−1). In the 1st 20-year period (1963–1982), there was a significant (P < 0.001) decrease (16%) on all experimental plots, which may be due to the winter half year (WHY) precipitation (228 mm), summer half year (SHY) precipitation (288 mm), the NPKCaMg fertilizer application rate (64 kg·ha−1), and the potato-rye-wheat-lupin-sunflower crop sequence. In the 2nd 20-year period (1983–2002) SOC pool values varied between 3.13 and 4.47 mg·kg−1. The 16.9% significant (P < 0.001) increase 16.9% could be attributed to the lower WHY (204 mm) precipitation, higher SHY (320 mm) precipitation, higher NPKCaMg fertilizer rate (213 kg·ha−1), and the sunflower-grass-barley-tobacco-wheat-triticale cropping system. NPKCaMg fertilization resulted in a significant (P < 0.001) decline (16.6%) in SOC in comparison to the control plots in the 1st 20-year interval, while in the 2nd 20-year period a significant (P < 0.001) rise (up to 31.9%) was registered. During the 40 experimental years the seasonal correlations (R2) among SOC (mg·kg−1), WHY and SHY precipitation (mm) ranged from 0.3343 to 0.9078 (on the P < 0.001 significance level). The correlations (R2) on the influence of NPKCaMg fertilization on SOC (mg·kg−1) and precipitation (mm) were significant (P < 0.001): the means for WHY, SHY and over the 40 years were 0.4691, 0.6171 and 0.6582, respectively. Organic carbon reserves (mg·kg−1) in soils decreased linearly as precipitation increased (from 3.22 to 7.27 mm·yr−1). In case this trend — increasing precipitation caused by climate change reduces SOC in arable soils — will continue, and is aggravated by warming temperatures and a more altering climate (as predicted by climate change forecasts), the livelihoods of many Hungarian and European farmers may be substantially altered. Thus, farmers must take into consideration the climate (WHY and SHY precipitation), fertilization (NPKCaMg), and cropping (tuber-seed-tobacco-protein-oil-forage) changeability to optimize their SOC pool, soil carbon sequestration, soil sustainability and crop management in the nearest future.


precipitation fertilization SOC 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams, R.M., Fleming, R.A., Chang, C.C., McCarl, B.A., Rosenzweig, C. 1995. A reassessment of the economic effects of global climate change on U.S. agriculture. Climatic Change 30:147–167.Google Scholar
  2. Ardö, J., Olsson, L. 2003. Assessment of soil organic carbon in semi-arid Sudan using GIS and the CENTURY model. Journal of Arid Environments 54:633–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baranyai, F., Fekete, A., Kovács, I. 1987. Evaluation of the Nutrient Status of Hungarian Soils. (In Hungarian.) Mezőgazdasági Kiadó, Budapest, 189 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Barrow, E.M., Hulme, M., Semenov, M.A., Brooks, R.J. 2000. Climate change scenarios. In: Downing, T. E., Harrison, P.A., Butterfield, R.E., Londsdale, K.G. (eds), Climate Change, Climatic Variability and Agriculture in Europe: An integrated assessment. Research report No. 21. Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford, pp. 17–27.Google Scholar
  5. Batjes, N.H. 1996. Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 47:151–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Batjes, N.H., Sombroek, W.G. 1997. Possibilities for carbon sequestration in tropical and subtropical soils. Global Change Biology 3:161–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bremner, J.M., Keeney, D.R. 1966. Determination and isotope-ratio analysis of different forms of nitrogen in soils. 3. Exchangeable ammonium, nitrate and nitrite by extraction destillation methods. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 30:577–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bryant, C.R., Barry, S., Michael, B. 2000. Adaptation in Canadian agriculture to climatic variability and change. Climatic Change 45:181–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burke, I.C., Yonker, C.M., Parton, W.J., Cole, C.V., Flach, K., Schimel, D.S. 1989. Texture, climate, and cultivation effects on soil organic matter context in U.S. grassland soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 53:800–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buyanovsky, G.A., Wagner, G.H. 1998. Carbon cycling in cultivated land and its global significance. Global Change Biology 4:131–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. David, M.L., Kelly, J.B., James, J.O.B. 1999. Impact of ENSO-related climate anomalies on crop yield in the US. Climate Change 42:351–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Egnér, H., Riehm, H., Domingo, W.R. 1960. Untersuchungen über die chemische Bodenanalyse als Grundlage für die Beurteilung des Nährstoffzustandes der Böden. II. K. Lantbrhögsk, Ann. 26:199.Google Scholar
  13. Graef, F., Haigis, J. 2001. Spatial and temporal rainfall variability in the Sahel and its effects on farmers’ management strategies. Journal of Arid Environments 48:221–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Houghton, R.A., Hobbie, J.E., Melillo, J.M., Moore, B., Peterson, B.J., Shaver, G.R., Woodwell, G.M. 1983. Changes in the carbon content of terrestrial biota and soils between 1860 and 1980: a net release of CO2 to the atmosphere. Ecol. Monogr. 53:235–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jolánkai, M. 2005. Effect of climate change on plant cultivation. (In Hungarian.) In: “AGRO-21” Füzetek 41:47–58.Google Scholar
  16. Kádár, I. 1992. Principles and Methods in Plant Nutrition. (In Hungarian.) RISSAC HAS, Budapest, 398 pp.Google Scholar
  17. Kádár, I., Szemes, I. 1994. Lesson Learned from a 30 Year Old Field Trial in Hungary. (In Hungarian.) RISSAC-HAS, Budapest, 248 pp.Google Scholar
  18. Kirschbaum, M.U.F., Schlamadinger, B., Cannell, M.G.R., Hamburg, S.P., Karjalainen, T., Kurz, W.A., Prisley, S., Schulze, E.D., Singh, T.P. 2001. A generalised approach of accounting for biospheric carbon stock changes under the Kyoto Protocol. Environmental Science and Policy 4:73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lal, R. 1995. Global soil erosion by water and carbon dynamics. In: Lal, R., Kimble, J., Levine, E., Stewart, B.A. (eds), Soils and Global Change. Adv. Soil Sci. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 131–142.Google Scholar
  20. Lal, R. 2001. Potential of desertification control to sequester carbon and mitigate the greenhouse effect. Climatic Change 51:35–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lal, R. 2002. Soil carbon dynamics in cropland and rangeland. Environmental Pollution 116:353–362.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lal, R., Kimble, J., Follett, R. 1998. Land use and soil C pools in terrestrial ecosystems. In: Lal, R., Kimble, J., Follett, R.F., Stewart, B.A. (eds), Management of Carbon Sequestration in Soil. Adv. Soil Sci. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
  23. Lal, R., Kimble, J., Stewart, B.A. 1995. Towards soil management for mitigating the greenhouse effect. In: Lal, R., Kimble, J., Levine, E., Stewart, B.A. (eds), Soil Management and Greenhouse Effect. Adv. Soil Sci. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 373–381.Google Scholar
  24. Láng, I. 1973. Műtrágyázási tartamkísérletek homoktalajokon (Long-term fertilizer experiments on sandy soils). MTA Doktori Értekezés. MTA TMB. Budapest, 248 pp.Google Scholar
  25. Lásztity, B. 2006. Mineral Nutrient Accumulation in Cereals. (In Hungarian, with English abstract.) Műegyetemi Kiadó, Budapest, 94 pp.Google Scholar
  26. Le Houérou, H.N. 1995. Climate change, drought and desertification. Journal of Arid Environments 33:133–185.Google Scholar
  27. Marosi, S., Szilárd, J. 1969. Plan of Tisza (in Hungarian). Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, 381 pp.Google Scholar
  28. Marschner, H. 1995. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. Academic Press, London, United Kingdom, 883 pp.Google Scholar
  29. Márton L. 2005. Disasters as drought-, and rainfall excess and artificial fertilization effects on crop yield. In: Proc. Intern. Conf. on Energy, Environment and Disasters-INCEED2005 (Charlotte, 24–30 July, 2005). ISEG, Charlotte, pp. 49–50.Google Scholar
  30. Márton L., Pereda, M.P., Mohinder, S.G. 2007. Long-term studies of crop yields with changing rainfall and fertilization. Agricultural Engineering Research 13:37–47.Google Scholar
  31. Metting, F.B., Smith, J.L., Amthor, J.S., Izaurralde, R.C. 2001. Science needs and new technology for increasing soil carbon sequestration. Climatic Change 51:11–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Németh, T., Csathó, P., Anton, A. 1998. Soil carbon dynamics in relation to cropping systems in principal ecoregions of Eastern Europe, with particular regard to Hungarian experiences. In: Lal, R., Kimble, J. Follett, R.F., Stewart, B.A. (eds), Management of Carbon Sequestration in Soil. Adv. Soil Sci. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 255–283.Google Scholar
  33. Parton, W.J., Schimel, D.S., Cole, C.V., Ojima, D.S. 1987. Analysis of factors controlling soil organic levels of grasslands in the Great Plains. Soil Science Society of America Journal 51:1173–1179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Post, W.M., Izaurralde, R.C., Mann, R.C.L.K., Bliss, N. 2001. Monitoring and verifying changes of organic carbon in soil. Climatic Change 51:73–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rosenzweig, C., Iglesias, A. 2003. Potential Impact of Climate Change on World Food Supply. Data sets from a major crop modeling study. Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center, Columbia University, New York, 28 pp.Google Scholar
  36. Russell, C.M., Jennifer, A.B. 1991. Climatic Risk in Crop Production: Models and Management for the Semiarid Tropics and Subtropics. C. A. B. International, Wallingford, 548 pp.Google Scholar
  37. Schlesinger, W.H., Andrews, J.A. 2000. Soil respiration and the global carbon cycle. Biogeochemistry 48:7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Smith, P., Smith, J.U., Powlson, D.S., McGill, W.B., Arah, J.R.M., Chertov, O.G., Coleman, K., Frankoe, U., Frolking, S., Jenkinson, D.S., Jensen, L.S., Kelly, R.H., Klein-Gunnewiek, H., Komarov, A.S., Li, C., Molina, J.A.E., Mueller, T., Parton, W.J.M., Thornley, J.H.M., Whitmore, A.P. 1997. A comparision of the performance of nine soil organic matter models using datasets from seven long-term experiments. Geoderma 81:153–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. SPSS. 2000. SigmaPlot for Windows. Ver. 3.2, Chicago, III.: SPSS, Inc.Google Scholar
  40. Trierweiler, J.F., Lindsay, W.L. 1969. EDTA-ammonium carbonate soil test for zink. Soil. Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 33:49–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Várallyay, Gy. 1992. Effect of global climate change to soil. (In Hungarian.) Magyar Tudomány 9:1071–1076.Google Scholar
  42. Várallyay, Gy. 1994. Soil management and environmental relationships in Central and Eastern Europe. (In Hungarian.) Agrokémia és Talajtan 43:41–66.Google Scholar
  43. Várallyay, Gy. 2005. Possible pedological effects of climate changes in the Kisalföld. (In Hungarian.) In: “AGRO-21” Füzetek 43:11–23.Google Scholar
  44. Von Blottnitz, H., Rabl, A., Boiadjiev, D., Taylor, T., Arnold, S. 2006. Damage costs of nitrogen fertilizer in Europe and their internalisation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 49:413–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Voss, R.E., Hanway, J.J., Fuller, W.A. 1970. Influence of soil management and climatic factors on the yield response by corn to N, P and K fertilizer. Agron. J. 62:736–740.Google Scholar
  46. Walter, E.R. 1973. Soil Conditions and Plant Growth. Longman, London-New York, 849 pp.Google Scholar
  47. Wang, S.P, Zhou, G.S., Gao, S.H., Guo, J.P. 2005. Soil organic carbon and labile carbon along a precipitation gradient and their responses to some environmental changes. Pedosphere 15:676–680.Google Scholar
  48. Wigley, T.M.L. 1999. The Science of Climate Change: Global and U.S. Perspectives. Pew Center on Global Climate Change, 48 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Institute for Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry of the Hungarian Academy of SciencesBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations