Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 36, Issue 2, pp 353–360 | Cite as

Morphology of Tassel Components and their Relationship to Some Quantitative Features in Maize

  • Z. BódiEmail author
  • P. Pepó
  • A. Kovács


Discovering the relationships among plant morphological and quantitative features is very important in maize breeding and production, particularly if they can be altered by selection or agro-technical methods. We examined tassel characteristics (tassel weight, tassel stalk diameter, number of primary branches, total length of branches, tassel length from lower and upper branches, Tassel Area Index) and several quantitative features (plant height, ear height, LAI, number of leaf, yield, 1000-kernel weight, test weight) of 12 hybrids in randomized block design during two subsequent years on two locations. Our aim was to find correlation between traits. Tassel weight was positively correlated with total number of branches (0.59**), number of primary branches (0.53**) and tassel area index (0.63**), and negatively correlated with plant height (−0.45**) and yield (−0.39**). Tassel area index was negatively correlated with plant height (−0.63**) and yield (−0.55**), as were number of branches and Leaf Area Index (0.39**). Number of primary branches showed medium correlation with plant height (−0.43**). Test weight correlated negatively with plant height, ear height, yield, leaf area index (LAI) and 1000-kernel weight. Because a number of these traits are highly heritable, these correlations could be used as a basis for indirect selection of special features in maize breeding programs.


correlation analysis maize plant height Tassel Area Index tassel morphology yield Zea mays L. 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anda, A., Tóbiás, F. 1999. Comparative study for the estimation of single leaf area in maize and for the verification of two different leaf area meters. Növénytermelés 48:55–67.Google Scholar
  2. Aulicino, B.M., Palacios, G.I., Pischedda, G., Magoja, L.J. 1987. Effect of perennial teosinte introgression on maize tassel traits. Maize Genetics Newsletter 61:64–65.Google Scholar
  3. Berke, G.T., Rocheford, R.T. 1999. Quantitave trait loci for tassel traits in maize. Crop Science 39:1439–1443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bocz, E. 1992. Kukorica: származása, morfológiája, biológiai jellemzői (Corn: origin, morphology, biological features). In: Bocz, E. (ed.), Szántóföldi növénytermesztés (Crop production), Mezőgazda Kiadó, Budapest, pp. 365–368.Google Scholar
  5. Bódi, Z., Pepó, P. 2007. A kukorica hektolitersúlyt befolyásoló tényezők (Factors effecting maize test weight). Agroinform 16 (2):13.Google Scholar
  6. Bódi, Z., Pepó, P., Zubor, Á., Tóth, Sz., Prokisch, J., Győri, Z. 2006. Investigation of genetic diversity in irradiated maize lines and its relation to hybrid performance. Acta Agraria Debreceniensis 23:20–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dorsey-Redding, C., Hurburgh, C.R., Johnson, L.A., Fox, S.R. 1991. Relationships among maize quality factors. Cereal Chemistry 68:602–605.Google Scholar
  8. El Hallof, N., Sárvári, M. 2006. Effect of different fertilizer doses on yield, LAI and photosynthetic activity of maize hybrids. Cereal Research Communications 34:441–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fonseca, A.E., Westgate, M.E., Grass, L., Dornbos, D.L., Jr. 2003. Tassel morphology as an indicator of potential pollen production in corn. Online. Crop Management doi:
  10. Geraldi, I.O., Miranda-Filho, J.B., Vencovsky, R. 1978. Prospects of breeding maize (Zea mays L.) with reference to tassel characters. Abstracts, 30 th annual reunion. Brazilian Society for Scientific progress 30:533–534.Google Scholar
  11. Geraldi, I.O., Miranda Filho, J.B., Vencovsky, R. 1985. Estimates of genetic parameters for tassel characteres in maize (Zea mays L.) and breeding perspectives. Maydica 30:1–14.Google Scholar
  12. Gyenesné Hegyi, Zs., Kizmus, L., Nagy, E., Marton, L.Cs. 2001. Kukorica (Zea mays L.) címerágak számának és az egyedi produkciónak vizsgálata eltérő ökológiai körülmények között. (Investigation of number of primary branches and individual plant production in maize (Zea mays L.) under various ecological conditions). II. Növénytermesztési Tudományos Nap, Proceedings (Eds: Pepó, P., Jolánkai, M.), Budapest, pp. 185–191.Google Scholar
  13. Hegyi Zs. 2003. A termőhely és a tőszám hatása különböző rokonsági körökbe tartozó beltenyésztett kukorica törzsek és hibridjeik tulajdonságaira eltérő évjáratokban. Doktori Ph.D. értekezés (Effect of location and plant density on the characteristics of inbred maize lines belonging to various related groups, and of their hybrids, in different years. PhD thesis), SZIE, Gödöllő.Google Scholar
  14. Hidvégi, Sz., Rácz, F., Szöllősi, G. 2005. Relationship between the viability of maize-pollen and the fertilization. Cereal Research Communications 33:121–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hidvégi, Sz., Rácz, F., Tóth, Z., Nándori, S. 2006. Relationship between the viability of maize-pollen and quantity of crop. Cereal Research Communications 34:477–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jakab, P. 2003. The importance of nutrient supply in the hybrid specific corn production. PhD thesis, DebrecenGoogle Scholar
  17. Lambert, R.J., Johnson, R.R. 1977. Leaf angle, tassel morphology, and the performance of maize hybrids. Crop Science 18:499–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li, Z. Shu-ting, D., Cun-hui, L., Kong-jun, W., Ji-wang, Z., Peng, L. 2007. Correlation analysis on maize test weight, yield and quality. Scientia Agricultura Sinica 40:405–411.Google Scholar
  19. Mock, J.J., Schuetz, H.S. 1974. Inheritance of tassel branch number in maize. Crop Science 14:885–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Neto, R.A., Nass, L.L., de Miranda Filho, B.J. 1997. Potential of twenty exotic germplasms to improve Brazilian maize architecture. Brazilian Journal of Genetics 20 (4), doi:
  21. Pomeranz, Y., Hall, G.E., Czuchajowska, Z., Martin, C.R., Lai, F.S. 1986. Test weight, hardness, and breakage susceptibility of qellow dent corn hybids. Cereal Chemistry 63:349–351.Google Scholar
  22. Rácz, F., Hidvégi, Sz., Záborszky, S., Pál, M., Marton, Cs.L. 2006. Pollen production of new generation inbred corn lines. Cereal Research Communications 34:633–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Upadyayula, N., Wasson, J., Bohn O.M., Rocheford, R.T. 2006. Quantitative trait loci analysis of phenotypic traits and principal components of maize tassel inflorescence architecture. Theoretical Applied Genetics 113:1395–1407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Vidal-Martínez, V.A., Clegg, D.M., Johnson, E.B. 2001a. Genetic studies on maize pollen and grain yield and their yield components. Maydica 46:35–40.Google Scholar
  25. Vidal-Martínez, V.A., Clegg, D.M., Johnson, E.B., Valdivia-Bernal, R. 2001b. Phenotypic and genotypic relationships between pollen and grain yields components in maize. Agrociencia 35:503–511.Google Scholar
  26. Vidal-Martínez, A.V., Clegg, D.M., Johnson, E.B., Osuna-García, A.J., Coutiño-Estrada, B. 2004. Phenotypic plasticity and pollen production components in maize. Agrociencia 38:273–284.Google Scholar
  27. Wych, R.D. 1988. Production of hybrid seed corn. In: Sprague, G.F., Dudley, J.W. (eds), Corn and Corn Improvement. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp. 565–607.Google Scholar
  28. Zsubori, Zs., Gyenes-Hegyi, Zs., Illés, O., Pók, I., Rácz, F., Szőke, Cs. 2002. Inheritance of plant and ear height in maize (Zea mays L.). Acta Agraria Debreceniensis 8:34–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Horticulture and Plant Biotechnology, Centre of Agricultural SciencesUniversity of DebrecenDebrecenHungary

Personalised recommendations