Advertisement

Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 36, Issue 2, pp 313–326 | Cite as

Agronomic and Kernel Quality of Ancient Wheats Grown in Central and Southern Italy

  • F. StagnariEmail author
  • P. Codianni
  • M. Pisante
Article

Abstract

Several genotypes of the two “ancients wheats” species, Khorasan wheat and emmer, were evaluated in two different marginal areas of central and southern Italy. They were compared with some old and new released varieties of durum wheat, in order to better understand their agronomic potential and their suitability to be grown in those conditions. Khorasan wheat was the worst yielding species with the highest plant height, kernel and hectolitre weight. Yield and kernel weight from emmer resulted intermediate between the other two species, while plant height did not differ from that of durum wheat. Emmer exhibited high protein and gluten content. Wide genetic response to many traits was found within each species grouping; this suggests that some emmer and Khorasan wheat genotypes have the potential to give high quality product and interesting yield in rainfed marginal areas of central and southern Italy.

Keywords

ancient wheats emmer Khorasan wheat marginal areas 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abdel-Aal, E.S.M., Sosulski, F.W., Hucl, P. 1998. Origins, characteristics, and potentials of ancient wheats. Cereal Foods World 43:708–715.Google Scholar
  2. Avivi, L. 1978. High grain protein content in wild tetraploid wheat Triticum dicoccoides Korn. In: Ramanujam, S. (ed.), Proc. 5 th Int. Wheat Genetic Symp. New Delhi, India. 23–28 Feb. 1978, Indian Agric. Res. Inst., New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
  3. Boggini, G., Doust, M.A., Annicchiarico, P., Pecetti, L. 1997. Yielding ability, yield stability, and quality of exotic durum wheat germplasm in Sicily. Plant Breeding 116:541–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. D’Antuono, L.F. 1994. Obsolete wheat in Italy: an overview on cultivation, use and perspectives for their conservation. In: Padulosi, S., Ager, H., Frison, E. (eds), Report of the IPGRI Workshop on “Conservation and Use of Underutilized Mediterranean Species”. Valenzano, Bari, Italy, 28–30 March 1994. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, pp. 41–48.Google Scholar
  5. D’Antuono, L.F., Bravi, R. 1996. The hulled wheat industry: present developments and impact on genetic resources conservation. In: Padulosi, S., Hammer, K., Heller, J. (eds), Hulled Wheats, Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Hulled Wheats. Castelvecchio Pascoli, Tuscany, Italy, 21–22 July 1995. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (IPGRI), Rome, pp. 221–233.Google Scholar
  6. Edmeades, G.O., Bolanos, J., Lafitte, H.R., Rajaram, S., Pfeiffer, W., Fischer, R.A. 1989. Traditional approaches to breeding for drought resistance in cereals. In: Baker, F.W.G. (ed.), Drought Resistance in Cereals. ICSU Press and CAB Int., Wallingford, pp. 27–52.Google Scholar
  7. Ephrat, J., Gerechter-Amitai, Z.K., Grama, A., Kagan, J., Karchy, Z. 1968. Items from Israel. Annual Wheat Newsletters. 15:49–51.Google Scholar
  8. Feldman, M. 1976. Wheats. In: Simonds, N., Longman W. (eds), Evolution of Crop Plants. London, pp. 121.Google Scholar
  9. Fernandez-Figares, I., Marinetto, J., Royo, C., Ramos, J.M., Garcìa del Moral, L.F. 2000. Amino-acid composition and protein and carbohydrate accumulation in the grain of triticale grown under terminal water stress simulated by a senescing agent. Journal Cereal Science 32:249–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. García del Moral, L.F., Boujenna, A., Yánez, J.A., Ramos, J.M. 1995. Forage production, grain yield, and protein content in dual-purpose triticale grown for both grain and forage. Agronomy Journal 87:902–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. García del Moral, L.F., Rharrabti, Y., Villegas, D., Royo, C. 2003. Evaluation of grain yield and its components in durum wheat under Mediterranean conditions: an ontogenic approach. Agronomy Journal 95:266–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grausgruber, H., Oberforster, M., Ghambashidze, G., Ruckenbauer, P. 2005. Yield and agronomic traits of Khorasan wheat (Triticum turanicum Jakubz.). Field Crops Research 91:319–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harlan, J.R. 1981. The early history of wheat: earliest traces to the sack of Rome. In: Evans, L.T., Peacock, W.J. (eds), Wheat Science Today and Tomorrow. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, p. 290.Google Scholar
  14. Heun, M., Schäfer-Pregl, R., Klawan, D., Castagna, R., Accerbi, M., Borghi, B., Salamini, F. 1997. Site of einkorn wheat domestication identified by DNA fingerprinting. Science 278:1312–1314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jenner, C.F., Uglade, T.D., Aspinall, D. 1991. The physiology of starch and protein deposition in the endosperm of wheat. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 18:211–226.Google Scholar
  16. Jones, D.B., Peterson, M.L., Geng, S. 1979. Association between grain filling rate and duration and yield components in rice. Crop Science 19:641–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Landi, A., Guarneri, R. 1992. Durum wheat and pasta industries: twenty years of achievement in science and technology. In: Feillet, P. (ed.), Cereal Chemistry and Technology: a Long Past and a Bright Future. 9 th International Cereal and Bread Congress, Paris 1–5 June. INRA, Montpellier, France, pp. 139–142.Google Scholar
  18. Liu, C.Y., Rathjen, A.J., Shepherd, K.W., Gras, P.W., Giles, L.C. 1995. Grain quality and yield characteristics of D-genome disomic substitution lines in “Langdon” (Triticum turgidum var. durum). Plant Breeding 114:34–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mazzieri, G., Governatori, C., Petrini, A., Fuselli, D. 2003. Scelta delle varietà di grano duro — Marche. L’Informatore Agrario 36:53–55.Google Scholar
  20. Meot, J.M. 1994. Drying. In: European Seminar: quality of durum wheat and pasta. PECEAA, Pole Europeen de Communication et d’Echanges Agro-alimentaires. c/o Regional Rhone-Alpes 78 route de Paris F-69260 Charbonnieres les Bains (1994 January 26–28, Montpellier, France), pp. 75–82.Google Scholar
  21. Nass, H.G., Reiser, B. 1975. Grain filling period and grain yield relationships in spring wheat. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 55:673–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nesbitt, M., Samuel, D. 1996. From staple crop to extinction? The archaeology and history of the hulled wheats. In: Padulosi, S., Hammer, K., Heller, J. (eds) Hulled Wheats. Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Hulled Wheats, vol. 4, Promoting the conservation and use of underutilized and neglected crops. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, pp. 41–100.Google Scholar
  23. Nevo, E., Grama, A., Beiles, A., Golenberg, E.M. 1986. Resources of high protein genotypes in wild wheat, Triticum dicoccoides in Israel: predictive method by ecology and allozyme markers. Genetica 68:215–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Percival, J. 1921. The Wheat Plant. A Monograph. Duckworth & Co., London, 463 pp.Google Scholar
  25. Perrino, P. 1993. The farro: an ancient crop to renew. Agricoltura 21:9–15.Google Scholar
  26. Perrino, P., Hammer, K. 1982. Triticum monococcum L. and T. dicoccum Schubler (Syn of T. dicoccon Schrank) are still cultivated in Italy. Genetica Agraria 36:343–352.Google Scholar
  27. Perrino, P., Hammer, K., 1984. The Farro: further information on its cultivation in Italy, utilization, and conservation. Genetica Agraria 38:303–311.Google Scholar
  28. Peterson, C.J., Graybosch, P.S., Baenziger, P.S., Grombacher, A.W. 1992. Genotype and environment effects on quality characteristics of hard red winter wheat. Crop Science 32:98–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sissons, M.J., Hare, R.A. 2002. Tetraploid wheat — a resource for genetic improvement of durum wheat quality. Cereal Chemistry 79:78–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stehno, Z., Manev, I.M. 1999. Preliminary evaluation of Triticum turgidum subsp. dicoccum and polonicum accessions for their possible use in food production. Annual Wheat Newsletter, Vol. 45.Google Scholar
  31. Todd, A.G., Spaner, D. 2003. Spring cereals for forage and grain production in a cool maritime climate. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 189:7–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Troccoli, A., Codianni, P. 2005. Appropriate seeding rate for einkorn, emmer, and spelt grown under rainfed condition in southern Italy. European Journal of Agronomy 22:293–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vavilov, N.I. 1951. The origin, variation, immunity and breeding of cultivated plants (translated from the Russian by Chester, S.). Chronica Botanica 13:1–366.Google Scholar
  34. Wrigley, C.W., Blumenthal, C., Gras, P.W., Barlow, E.W.R. 1994. Temperature variation during grain filling changes in wheat-grain quality. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 21:875–885.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Food SciencesUniversity of TeramoMosciano S.AngeloItaly
  2. 2.CRA Experimental Institute of CerealsFoggiaItaly

Personalised recommendations