Producing forage maize (Zea mays L.) in twin-row planting pattern has been attempted in past years. This research was performed to determine effects of planting patterns and densities on yields of forage maize hybrids. We also examined other plant characteristics associated with forage yield under second crop conditions in Hatay, East Mediterranean region of Turkey, during 2003 and 2004. The experimental design was a randomized complete block design in a split-split-plot arrangement with three replications. The planting patterns of twin row (55:20 cm), conventional row (75 cm) and narrow row (50 cm) were main plots, the plant densities (80,000, 100,000 and 120,000 plants ha −1) were split-plots, and the hybrids (PR-1550, MAVERIK and DK-585) were split-split plots. Forage and dry matter yields were significantly affected by planting patterns, plant densities and maize hybrids. Our results revealed the advantage of twin-row planting pattern over conventional and narrow row plantings at all plant densities. Twin row planting out-yielded conventional row (16% more forage and 10.2% more dry matter yield) and narrow-row (7.9% more forage and 5.9% more dry matter yield) plantings. Twin-row planting pattern may be a profitable production technique for forage maize producers.
Brown, R.H., Beaty, E.R., Ethredge, W.J., Hayes, D.D. 1970. Influence of row width and plant population on yield of two varieties of maize (Zea mays L.). Agron. J. 62:767–770.
Bryant, H.T., Blaser, R.E. 1968. Plant constituents of an early and a late maize hybrid as affected by row spacing and plant population. Agron. J. 60:557–559.
Cox, W.J., Otis, D.J. 1993. Grain and silage yield responses of commercial maize hybrids to plant densities. Agron. Abstracts 1993, ASA, Madison, WI, p. 132.
Cox, W.J. 1996. Whole-plant physiological and yield response of maize to plant density. Agron. J. 88:489–496.
Cox, W.J. 1997. Corn forage and grain yield response to plant densities. J. Prod. Agric. 10:405–410.
Cox, W.J., Hanchar, J.J., Knoblauch, W.A., Cherney, J.H. 2006. Growth, yield, quality, and economics of corn silage under different row spacings. Agron. J. 98:163–167.
Cummings, D.G., Dobson Jr., J.W. 1973. Maize for silage as influenced by hybrid maturity, row spacing, plant population, and climate. Agron. J. 65:240–243.
Cuomo, G.J., Redfearn, D.D., Blouin, D.C. 1998. Plant density effects on tropical maize forage mass, morphology, and nutritive value. Agron. J. 90:93–96.
Cusicanqui, J.A., Lauer, J.G. 1999. Plant density and hybrid influence on maize forage yield and quality. Agron. J. 91:911–915.
Doss, B.D., King, C.C., Patterson, R.M. 1970. Yield components and water use by silage maize with irrigation, plastic mulch, nitrogen fertilization, and plant spacing. Agron. J. 62: 541–543.
Duncan, W.G. 1975. Maize. In: Even, L.T. (ed.), Crop Physiology: Some Case Histories, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 23–50.
Farnham, D.E. 2001. Row spacing, plant density, and hybrid effects on maize grain yield and moisture. Agron. J. 93:1049–1053.
Gozubenli, H., Kilinc, M., Sener, O., Konuskan, O. 2004. Effects of single and twin row planting on yield and yield components in maize. Asian J. of Plant Sci. 3:203–206.
Graybill, J.S., Cox, W.J., Otis, D.J. 1991. Yield and quality of forage maize as influenced by hybrid, planting date, and plant density. Agron. J. 83:559–564.
Hoeft, R.G., Nafziger, E.D., Johnson, R.R., Aldrich, S.R. 2000. Modern Maize and Soybean Production, MCSP Publ., Savoy, IL, p. 353.
Iqbal, K., Mahmood, T., Usman, M. 2001. Yield and quality of two maize hybrids as affected by different planting patterns. J. Biol. Sci. 1:249–250.
Karlen, D.L., Camp, C.R. 1985. Row spacing, plant population, and water management effects on maize in the Atlantic coastal plain. Agron. J. 77:393–398.
Larson, W.E., Hanway, J.J. 1977. Maize production. In: Sprague, G.F. (ed.), Maize and Maize Improvement. American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Madison, WI., pp. 625–669.
Lewis, A.L., Cox, W.J., Cherney, J.H. 2004. Hybrid, maturity and cutting height interactions on corn forage yield and quality. Agron. J. 96:267–274.
Nielsen, R.L. 1988. Influence of hybrids and plant density on grain yield and stalk breakage in maize grown in 15-inch row spacing. J. Prod. Agric. 1:190–195.
Olson, R.A., Sander, D.H. 1988. Corn production. In: Sprague, G.F., Dudley, J.W. (eds), Maize and Maize Improvement, 3rd edition, #18 Agron. Series, America. Soc. Agron., Madison, pp. 659–662.
Ottman, MJ., Welch, L.F. 1989. Planting patterns and radiation interception, plant nutrient concentration and yield in corn. Agron. J. 81:167–174.
Paszkiewicz, S. 1996. Narrow row spacing influence on maize yield. In: Proc. Maize and Sorghum Res. Conf., 51 st, Chicago, IL. 11–12 Dec. 1996. Am. Seed Trade Assoc., Washington, DC, pp. 130–138.
Porter, P.M., Hicks, D.R., Lueschen, W.E., Ford, J.H., Warnes, D.D., Hoverstad, T.R. 1997. Maize response to row width and plant density in the Northern Maize Belt. J. Prod. Agric. 10:293–300.
Roth, G.C. 1996. Maize Grain and Silage Yield Responses to Narrow Rows. Agronomy Abstracts, ASA, Madison, WI., p. 128.
Scarsbrook, C.B., Doss, B.D. 1973. How plant populations and row widths affect light penetration, yield, and plant characteristics of irrigated corn. Ala. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 450.
Sener, O., Gozubenli, H., Konuskan, O., Kilinc, M. 2004. The effect of intra-row spacings on the grain yield and some agronomic characteristics of maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids. Asian J. Plant Sci. 3:429–432.
Turgut, I., Duman, A., Bilgili, U., Acikgoz, E. 2005. Alternate row spacing and plant density effects on forage and dry matter yield of maize hybrids (Zea mays L.). J. Agron. and Crop Sci. 91: 146–151.
Widdicombe, D.W., Thelen, K.D. 2002. Row width and plant density effect on maize forage hybrids. Agron. J. 94:326–330.
Wiersma, D.W., Carter, P.R., Albrecht, K.A., Coors, J.G. 1993. Kernel milkline stage and maize forage yield, quality, and dry matter content. J. Prod. Agric. 6:94–99.
About this article
Cite this article
Yilmaz, S., Erayman, M., Gozubenli, H. et al. Twin or Narrow-Row Planting Patterns versus Conventional Planting in Forage Maize Production in the Eastern Mediterranean. CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS 36, 189–199 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1556/CRC.36.2008.1.19
- forage yield
- narrow row
- plant density
- planting pattern