Advertisement

Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 177–187 | Cite as

Cutting Management of Dual Purpose Wheat Cultivars: A New Approach for Increasing Fodder Availability

  • J. K. BishtEmail author
  • L. Kant
  • A. K. Srivastva
Article

Abstract

North West Himalaya Region of India faces serious shortage of green fodder up to 60 percent, particularly in winter months of November to March. Possibility of augmenting green fodder availability from cultivated lands, which is very limited (10% of geographical area) is explored by cultivation of dual purpose wheat, providing green fodder a part from grain production. Influence of wheat variation and their cutting schedule on fodder and grain yield were studied. Selected wheat varieties included VL Gehun 829, VL Gehun 616 and advance lines of VL 818 and VL 840, respectively. Significantly higher green fodder yield (69.32 q/ha) was obtained from VL 818 than under VL Gehun 616 and VL Gehun 829, while it was at per with fodder yield of VL 840. Cutting of green fodder scheduled at 70 and 85 DAS resulted no significant difference in yield. However, it showed the possibility of extended availability of green fodder without affecting the production the grain and straw yield obtained under VL Gehun 829 (60.05 q and 121.5 q/ha, respectively) were statistically superior to VL Gehun 616 and VL 818 and at par with VL 840. Harvest of green fodder affected grain yield of wheat up to 7% through it was not statistically significant. Therefore, it can be concluded that among the different cultivar VL Gehun 829 and VL 840 are the most suitable for dual purpose and can be cut after 70 and 85 DAS for green fodder as both stage of cut produced at par green fodder, grain and straw yields, thereby ensuring fodder and food security in the region.

Keywords

wheat varieties cutting management green and dry fodder dual purpose varieties 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bishnoi, B.R., Hughes, J.I. 1979. Agronomic performance and protein contents of tall planted triticale, wheat and rye. Agronomy Journal 71:350–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bisht, J.K., Chandra, S., Singh, R.D., Gupta, H.S. 2004. Role of nitrogen in the yield enhancement of clipped wheat. Tropical Agriculture. 51:211–215.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, A.R., Almodares, A. 1976. Quantity and quality of the triticale fodder compared to other small grains. Agronomy Journal 68:264–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dunphy, D.J., McDaniel, M.E., Holt, E.C. 1982. Effect of fodder utilization on wheat grain yield. Crop Science 22:106–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gomez, A.K., Gomez, A.A. 1976. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. Toronto, pp. 671.Google Scholar
  6. Poysa, V.W. 1985. Effect of fodder harvest on grain yield and agronomic performance of winter triticale, wheat and rye. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 65:879–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Royo, C., Pares, D., 1996. Yield and quality of winter and spring triticale of fodder and grain. Grass Fodder Science 51:449–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Royo, C., Insa, J.A., Boujenna, A., Ramos, J.M., Montensions, E., Gracia del Moral, J.F. 1994. Yield and quality of spring triticale used for fodder and grain as influenced by sowing date and cutting stage. Field Crops Research 37:161–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Royo, C., Saller, C., Romagosa, I. 1995. Agronomical and morphological differentiation among winter and spring triticale. Plant Breeding 114:413–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Vivekananda Parvatiya Krishi Anusandhan Sansthan (ICAR)KhatyariIndia

Personalised recommendations