Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 63–70 | Cite as

Differences in Behavior of Salt Tolerant and Salt and Water Deficiency Tolerant Wheat Genotypes When Subjected to Various Salinity Levels

  • S. FarooqEmail author
  • F. Azam


Genetically diverse wheat genotypes comprising salt tolerant (V1 and V2), salt and water deficiency tolerant (V3, V4 and V5) and salt sensitive (V6) were subjected to various salinity levels. The objective was to see whether ion selectivity amenable to ion regulation and ion discrimination exist simultaneously in one genotype and how do they interact when subjected to various salinity levels. Plants were grown under salinity till the emergence of flag leaf. Analysis for Cl, Na+, K+ and of K+/Na+ ratio indicated higher concentration of K+ compared to Na+ and Cl in water deficiency tolerant group suggesting reduced uptake of both ions. In V1 and V2, concentration of Na+ and Cl were also low. Discrimination for K+-Na+ in V2, V3 and V4 was manyfolds higher than the parent V1 possibly due to differential transfer to this material, of various alleles native to Ae. cylindrica. V6 lacked ion selectivity capable of efficient K+-Na+ discrimination. Hence both K+ concentration and K+/Na+ ratio were the lowest making V6 a salt sensitive cultivar. The study revealed difference in type and level of salt tolerance in various genotypes, which indicated new ways of enhancing salt tolerance in commercial wheat varieties.


differential response K+/Na+ ratio ion discrimination ion selectivity Na+ influx salt tolerance wheat 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Cicek, N., Cakirlar, H. 2002. The effects of salinity on some physiological parameters in two maize cultivars. Bulg. J. Plant Physiol. 28:66–74.Google Scholar
  2. Dubcovsky, J., Santa Maria, G., Epstein, E., Lou, M.C., Dvorak, J. 1996. Mapping of the K/Na discrimination locus Kna 1 in wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 92:448–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Farooq, S., Azam, F. 2006. Cell membrane stability technique for screening salt tolerant wheat genotypes. J. Plant Physiol. 163:629–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Farooq, S., Asghar, M., Iqbal, N., Askari, E., Arif, M., Shah, T.M. 1995. Production and evaluation of salt tolerant wheat germplasm produced through crossing wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) with Aegilops cylindrica-II. Field evaluation of salt tolerant germplasm. Cereal Res. Comm. 23:275–282.Google Scholar
  5. Farooq, S., Askari, E., Zaidi, A.A., Shah, T.M. 1998. The wild Aegilops and sustainable agriculture: achievements and anticipations at NIAB. In: Sustainable Agriculture for Food, Energy and Industry: Strategies Towards Achievement, Vol. 2 Ed. by Bassam, N.El., Behl, R.K., Prochnow, B. James and James (Science Publisher), UK, pp. 662–668.Google Scholar
  6. Farooq, S., Aslam, Z., Niazi, M.L.K., Shah, T.M. 1988. Salt tolerance potential of wild resources of tribe Triticeae-I. Screening of perennial genera. Pak. J. Sci. Ind. Res. 31:506–511.Google Scholar
  7. Farooq, S., Azam, F. 2001a. Production of low input and stress tolerant wheat germplasm through the use of biodiversity residing in the wild relatives. Hereditas 135,:211–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Farooq, S., Azam, F. 2001b. Co-existence of salinity and drought tolerance in triticeae. Hereditas 135,:205–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Farooq, S., Iqbal, N., Asghar, M., Shah, T.M. 1992. Intergeneric hybridization for wheat improvement-VI. Production of salt tolerant wheat germplasm through crossing wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) with Aegilops cylindrica and its significance in practical agriculture. J. Genet. Breed. 46:125–132.Google Scholar
  10. Farooq, S., Niazi, M.L.K., Iqbal, N., Shah, T.M. 1989. Salt tolerance potential of wild resources of tribe Triticeae-II. Screening of species of the genus Aegilops. Plant Soil 119:255–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Forster, B.P., Miller, T.E., Law, C.N. 1988. Salt tolerance of two wheat-Agropyron Junceum disomic addition lines. Genome 30:559–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gorham, J. 1990. Salt tolerance in Triticeae. K/Na discrimination in synthetic hexaploid wheat. J. Exp. Bot. 41:623–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gorham, J., McDonnell, E., Budrewicz, E., Wyn-Jones, R.G. 1985a. Salt tolerance in the Triticeae: growth and solute accumulation in leaves of Thinopyrum bessarabicum. J. Exp. Bot. 36,:1021–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gorham, J., Wyn-Jones, R.G., McDonnel, E. 1985b. Some mechanisms of salt tolerance in crop plants. Plant Soil 9,:15–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harvey, D.M.R. 1985. The effects of salinity on ion concentration within the roots cells of Zea mays L. Planta 165:242–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoagland, D.R., Arnon, D.I. 1950. The Water Culture Method for Growing Plants Without Soil. Calif Agric Exp Sta Univ Calif., Circular No. 347.Google Scholar
  17. Iqbal, M.S., Naseem, A., Mahmood, K., Akhter, J. 2001. Comparative performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes under salinity stress. Ionic composition. Online J. Biol. Sci 1:43–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Munns, R. 2002. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell Environ. 25:239–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nobel, C.L., Holloran, G.M., West, D.W. 1984. Identification and selection for salt tolerance in Lucerne (Medicago sativa L.). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 35:239–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Qureshi, R.H. 1985. Selection of crops varieties and plant species suitable for salt affected areas of Pakistan. In: Proc. Natl. Workshop on Biosaline Research in Pakistan, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan, pp. 28–42.Google Scholar
  21. Qureshi, R.H., Salim, M., Aslam, Z., Sandhu, G.R. 1977. An improved gravel culture technique for salt tolerance studies on plants. Pak. J. Agric. Sci. 14:11–18.Google Scholar
  22. Shannon, M.C. 1978. Testing salt tolerance variability among tall wheat grass population. Agron. J. 70:719–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shannon, M.C. 1993. Development of salt stress tolerance-screening and selection systems for genetic improvement. In: Proc. Workshop on adaptation of plants to soil stresses. Ed. by Maranville, W.L., Baligar, B.V., Duncan, R.R., Yohe, J.M. University of NE, Lincoln, NE, pp. 117–132.Google Scholar
  24. Turner, N.C. 1986. Crop water deficit: a decade of progress. Adv. Agron. 39:1–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang, R.C., Li, X.M., Hu, Z.M., Zhang, J.Y., Larson, S.R., Zhang, X.Y., Grieve, C.M., Shannon, M.C. 2003. Development of salinity tolerant wheat recombinant lines from a wheat disomic addition line carrying a Thinopyrum junceum chromosome. Int. J. Plant Sci. 164:25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wolf, B. 1982. A comprehensive system of leaf analysis and its use for diagnosing crop nutrient status. Commun Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 13:1035–1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhu, J.K., Hasegawa, P.M., Bressan, R.A. 1997. Molecular aspects of osmotic stress in plants. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 16:253–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nuclear Institute for Agriculture and Biology (NIAB)FaisalabadPakistan

Personalised recommendations