Advertisement

Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 141–149 | Cite as

Comparison of Different Planting Methods in Relation to Grain Yield of Wheat

  • D. NovoselovićEmail author
  • G. Drezner
  • A. Lalić
  • S. Grljušić
  • J. Gunjača
Article

Abstract

The objective of this paper was to evaluate the adequacy of different methods of planting in small plots and compared with the grain yield rank of wheat genotypes in large plots under different planting densities. Significant differences were found among cultivars, same cultivars under different planting densities, years of testing and planting densities. The estimated values of heritability in narrow sense for grain yield were high and varied from 68 to 99%, depending on the method of planting and planting density. Comparison of correlation among cultivar’s rank between Method 1 (planting with drilling machine) and other Methods (manual planting) revealed that these relationships were dependant upon the year of testing and varied from low to high, positive or negative and from significant to non-significant. The highest correlation was found between Method 1 and Method 3 (20 kernels/hill) in both years of testing. If we wish to test a larger number of genotypes from gene bank collections or advanced lines in early phase of breeding program for grain yield on small plots we can recommend the use of hill plots with planting density as close as possible to those in large plots.

Keywords

winter wheat genotype grain yield planting method planting density 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Drezner, G. 1996. Selekcija pšenice (T. aestivum L.) u ranim generacijama zavisno o kriterijima izbora (Effects of selection in relation to different selection criteria in early generations of wheat). PhD thesis, University of Zagreb, Osijek.Google Scholar
  2. Ellison, F.W., Latter, B.D.H., Anttonen, T. 1985. Optimal regimes of selection for grain yield and harvest index in spring wheat. Euphytica 34:625–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Frey, K.J. 1965. The utility of hill plots in oat research. Euphytica 14:196–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Goldringer, I., Brabant, P., Kempton, R.A. 1994. Adjustment for competition between genotypes of single-row trials of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Plant Breed. 112:294–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Khadr, F.H., Kassem, A.A., Elkhishen, A.A. 1970. Hill versus row plot for testing wheat lines. Crop Sci. 10:449–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kramer, Th., Van Ooijen, J.W., Spitters, C.J.T. 1982. Selection for yield in small plots of spring wheat. Euphytica 31:549–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Novoselović, D., Barić, M., Drezner, G., Gunjača, J., Lalić, A. 2004. Quantitative inheritance of some wheat plant traits. Genet. Mol. Biol. 27 (1):92–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Peters, B., Spanakakis, A., Weber, W.E. 1991. Efficiency of early selection for yield performance in wheat. Plant Breed. 107:97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. SAS Institute Inc. 1999. SAS/STAT Software, Version 8. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
  10. Seitzer, J.F., Evans, L.E. 1978. Yield gains in wheat by the pedigree method of selection and two early yield tests. Z. Pflanzenzüchtg. 80:1–10.Google Scholar
  11. Sidwell, R.J., Smith, E.L., McNew, R.W. 1978. Heritability and genetic advance of selected agronomic traits in a winter cross. Cereal Res. Comm. 6 (2):103–111.Google Scholar
  12. Singh, M., Ceccarelli, S., Hamblin, J. 1993. Estimation of heritability from varietal trials data. Theor. Appl. Genet. 86:437–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Whan, B.R., Rathjen, A.J., Knight, R. 1981. The relation between wheat lines derived from F2, F3, F4 and F5 generations for grain yield and harvest index. Euphytica 30:419–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Novoselović
    • 1
    Email author
  • G. Drezner
    • 1
  • A. Lalić
    • 1
  • S. Grljušić
    • 1
  • J. Gunjača
    • 2
  1. 1.Agricultural Institute OsijekOsijekCroatia
  2. 2.Faculty of AgronomyUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations