Advertisement

Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 34, Issue 2–3, pp 1109–1116 | Cite as

Movement of Sugarcane mosaic virus in plants of resistant and susceptible maize lines

  • R. Pokorný
  • M. Porubová
Article

Summary

The movement of Sugarcane mosaic virus (SCMV) in the leaves and entire plants of three maize lines was studied under greenhouse conditions. One line was considered resistant and the other two showed a different level of susceptibility. The effect of the growth stage at which the maize plants were inoculated on SCMV movement was also examined. None of the lines tested was fully immune, even in the resistant line the inoculated leaves were infected. Nevertheless, SCMV was detected in the inoculated leaves 7 days later than in the susceptible lines and did not spread into the newly developed leaves. In the lines with the different level of susceptibility SCMV moved into the newly developed leaves at a different rate and in the less susceptible line the spread was also affected by the development stage of maize at inoculation. The spread of the virus from the inoculated parts of the leaves into the non-inoculated ones was also considerably faster in the highly susceptible line, compared with the susceptible and the resistant line, whereas in these two lines the rate of spread was dependent on the development stage of the plants under inoculation and also on the position of the leaf on the plant.

Keywords

maize Sugarcane mosaic virus (SCMV) resistance movement 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Clark, M.F. A.N. Adams (1977): Characteristics of the microplate method of enzymelinked immunosorbent assay for detection of plant viruses. — J. Gen. Virol. 37, 475–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Garcia-Ruiz, H., J.F. Murphy (2001): Age-related resistance in bell pepper to Cucumber mosaic virus. — Ann. appl. Biol. 139, 307–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. German-Retana, S., T. Candresse, E. Alias, R.P. Delbos, O. LeGall (2000): Effects of green fluorescent protein or beta-glucuronidase tagging on the accumulation and pathogenicity of a resistance-breaking Lettuce mosaic virus isolate in susceptible and resistant lettuce cultivars. — Mol. Plant — Microbe Interact. 13, 316–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Grumet, R., E. Kabelka., S. McQueen., T. Wai, R. Humphrey (2000): Characterization of sources of resistance to the watermelon strain of Papaya ringspot virus in cucumber: allelism and co-segregation with other potyvirus resistances. — Theor Appl Genet 101, 463–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kovács, G., R. Gáborjányi, R, Vasdinyei, É. Toldi (1998): Resistance of maize inbred lines to maize dwarf mosaic and sugarcane mosaic potyviruses. — Cereal Res. Comm. 26, 195–201.Google Scholar
  6. Kuntze, L., E. Fuchs, M. Gruntzig, B. Schulz, D. Klein, A.E. Melchinger (1997): Resistance of early-maturing European maize germplasm to sugarcane mosaic virus (SCMV) and maize dwarf mosaic virus (MDMV). — Plant Breeding 116, 499–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Law, M.D., J.W. Moyer, G.A. Payne (1989): Effect of host resistance on pathogenesis of maize dwarf mosaic virus. — Phytopathology 79, 757–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lei, J.S, G.N. Agrios (1986): Mechanism of resistance in corn to maize dwarf mosaic virus. — Phytopathology 76, 1034–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Oparka, K.J., S. Santa Cruz (2000): The great escape: Phloem transport and unloading of macromolecules. — Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 51, 323–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Pokorný, R., M. Porubová (2000): The occurrence of viral pathogens of the genus Potyvirus on maize (Zea mays L.) in the Czech Republic. — Z. PflKrankh. PflSchutz 107, 329–336.Google Scholar
  11. Pokorný, R., M. Porubová (2001): Resistance of maize lines and hybrids to Czech isolates of Maize dwarf mosaic virus and Sugarcane mosaic virus. — Z. PflKrankh. PflSchutz 108, 166–175.Google Scholar
  12. Procházka, S., I. Macháčková, J. Krekule, J. Šebánek: Plant Physiology, Academia, Praha, 1998 (In Czech).Google Scholar
  13. Rajamäki, M.L., J.P.T. Valkonen (1999): The 6K2 protein and the VPg of potato virus A are determinants of systemic infection in Nicandra physaloides. — Mol. Plant — Microbe Interact. 12, 1074–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Revers, F., O. LeGall, T. Candresse, A.J. Maule (1999): New advances in understanding the molecular biology of plant/potyvirus interactions. — Mol. Plant — Microbe Interact. 12, 367–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Soler, S., M.J. Diez, S. Rosello, F. Nuez (1999): Movement and distribution of tomato spotted wilt virus in resistant and susceptible accessions of Capsicum spp. — Can. J. Plant Pathol. 21, 317–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ullah, Z., R. Grumet (2002): Localization of Zucchini yellow mosaic virus to the veinal regions and role of viral coat protein in veinal chlorosis conditioned by the zym potyvirus resistance locus in cucumber. — Physiol. Molec. Plant Pathol. 60, 79–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Weigmann E., S. Ueki, K. Trutnyeva, V. Citovsky (2004): The ins and outs of nondestructive cell-to-cell and systemic movement of plant viruses. Crit Rev. Plant Sci. 23: 195–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2006

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Pokorný
    • 1
    • 2
  • M. Porubová
    • 3
  1. 1.Research Institute for Fodder Plants Troubsko, Ltd.TroubskoCzech Republic
  2. 2.Department of Crop SciencePlant Breeding and Plant MedicineBrnoCzech Republic
  3. 3.CEZEA - Breeding StationJSC.ČejčCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations