The Use of Morphological Traits and Genetic Markers to Estimate Genetic Relationships in Maize
The use of genetic markers allows the study of polymorphism and genetic distances between maize lines in greater depth than can be achieved on the basis of phenotype and DUS traits. The analysis of polymorphism between 46 maize inbred lines with known genetic background and the classification of these lines in related groups was carried out by means of morphological description, isoenzyme analysis, RAPD analysis, and identification using gene-linked microsatellite (SSR) markers. The genetic distance or degree of relationship between the lines was determined using cluster analysis. Only a very limited extent of allele polymorphism could be detected in isoenzyme analyses; the 46 lines formed only 18 gel electrophoresis groups. Nevertheless, on the basis of RAPD and SSR markers, all the lines could be distinguished from each other. This was reflected by the PIC (polymorphism index content) values, which ranged from 0.04 to 0.55 (mean 0.27) for the various enzyme loci, while far higher values were obtained for RAPD and SSR markers (0.20–0.91, mean 0.61, and 0.54–0.90, mean 0.73, respectively). Due to the large number of lines, two lines, derived from each other or from common parents, were chosen from each related group as the basis for grouping the lines according to genetic background. It was found that, while the individual marker systems only partially reflected the actual relationships between the lines, a joint processing of the genetic markers, supplemented with morphological data, revealed a close correlation between the groups formed on the dendrogram and the genetic background.
Index wordsmaize polymorphism isoenzyme RAPD SSR cluster analysis
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bourgoin-Greneche, M., J. Lallemand, 1993. Electrophoresis and its application to the description of varieties. A presentation of the techniques used by GEVES, Paris. 1–63.Google Scholar
- Dweikat, I., H. Ohm, S. Mackenzie, F. Patterson, S. Cambron, R. Ratcliffe, 1994. Association of a DNA marker with Hessian fly resistance gene H9 in wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet., 89: 5–968.Google Scholar
- European Union Community Plant Variety Office 2001. Protocol for distinctness, uniformity and stability tests. Zea mays L. (Maize)Google Scholar
- Goodman, M. M., C.W. Stuber, 1983. Races of maize. VI. Isozyme variation among races of maize in Bolivia. Maydica, 28: 5–187.Google Scholar
- Hunter, R. B., L.W. Kannenberg, 1971. Isozyme characterization of corn (Zea mays L.) inbreds and its relation to single cross hybrid performance. Can. J. Cytol., 13: 5–655.Google Scholar
- Lamkey, K.R., A.R. Hallauer, A.L. Kahler, 1987. Allelic differences at enzyme loci and hybrid performance in maize. J. Herd., 78: 5–234.Google Scholar
- Mullis, K. B., F.A. Faloona, 1987. Specific synthesis of DNA in vitro via a polymerase-catalyzed chain reaction. Methods Enzymol., 155: 5–350.Google Scholar
- Norusis, M. J., 1993. SPSS for Windows Professional Statistics Release 6.0, 385 pp.Google Scholar
- Pejic, I., P. Ajmone-Marsan, M. Morgante, V. Kozumplick, P. Castiglioni, G. Taramino, M. Motto, 1998. Comparative analysis of genetic similarity among maize inbred lines detected by RFLPs, RAPDs, SSRs, and AFLPs. Maize Genet. Coop. Newsletter, 72: 5–19.Google Scholar
- Price, S. C., A.L. Kahler, A.R. Hallauer, P. Charmley, D.A. Giegel, 1986. Relationships between performance and multilocusheterozygosity at enzyme loci in single-cross hybrids of maize. J. Herd., 77: 5–344.Google Scholar
- Smith, J. S. C., E.C.L. Chin, H. Shu, O.S. Smith, S.J. Wall, M.L. Senior, S.E. Mitchell, S. Kresowitch, E.J. Ziegl, 1997. An evaluation of the utility of SSR loci as molecular markers in maize (Zea mays L.): comparison with data from RFLPs and pedigree. Theor. Appl. Genet., 95: 5–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Smith, J. S. C., M.L. Senior, 1999. The utility of simple sequence repeat (SSR) data to preferentially identify progeny lines of maize (Zea mays L.) that are bred from known inbred parents. Maydica, 45: 5–213.Google Scholar
- Smith, J. S. C., O.S. Smith, 1989a. The description and assessment of distance between inbred lines of maize: I. The use of morphological traits as descriptors. Maydica, 34: 141–150.Google Scholar
- Smith, J. S. C., O.S. Smith, 1989b. The description and assessment of distances between inbred lines of maize: II. The utility of morphological, biochemical, and genetic descriptors and a scheme for testing of distinctiveness between inbred lines. Maydica, 34: 151–161.Google Scholar
- Smith, J. S. C., O.S. Smith, 1992. Measurement of genetic diversity among maize hybrids: A comparison of isozymic, RFLP, pedigree and heterosis data. Maydica, 37: 5–60.Google Scholar
- Stuber, C. W., J.F. Wendel, M.M. Goodman, J.S.C, Smith, 1988. Techniques and scoring procedure for starch gel electrophoresis of enzymes from maize. Tech. Bulletin, 286: 5–87.Google Scholar
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.