Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 33, Issue 4, pp 785–791 | Cite as

Effect of Time of Nitrogen Application on the Growth and Yield of Two Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Cultivars

  • Virender Sardana
  • Guo-Ping Zhang


A field experiment was conducted in China during winter season of 2001–2002 to study the response of time of nitrogen application on two cultivars (Xiumei 3 and 92-11) of barley. Apart from basal dose of 40 kg N/ha, 110 kg N/ha was applied at tillering (Ti) or in two equal splits at tillering and boot stages (T2) or at boot stage (T3). Cultivar 92-11 attained significantly lower plant height at boot stage and number of spikes/plant but took significantly more number of days to heading, registered significantly more chlorophyll content in leaves at different growth stages, produced significantly more number of grains/spike, grain weight/spike, single grain weight, N. concentration at boot stage and consequently produced significantly higher grain yield (3764 kg/ha) than cultivar Xiumei 3 (3201 kg/ha). Application of nitrogen at boot stage significantly reduced the plant height at both stages, dry matter accumulation, days taken to heading, leaf chlorophyll content at boot stage, grains per spike, grain weight per spike and individual grain weight but recorded significantly higher chlorophyll content in leaves at heading stage and higher N content as compared to its application at tillering. Split application of nitrogen at tillering and boot stages also recorded significantly better growth and yield attributes, N concentration and grain yield than its application at boot stage alone but was at par with nitrogen applied at tillering except grain weight per spike. Consequently application of nitrogen at tillering or its split application at tillering and boot stages produced statistically similar (4052 and 3816 kg/ha, respectively) but significantly higher grain yield than its application at boot stage (2500 kg/ha).

Index words

leaf chlorophyll content dry matter N concentration grain yield malt barley 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arends, A.M., Fox, G.P., Henry, R.J., Marschke, R.J. and Symons, M.H. (1995). Genetic and environmental variation in diastatic power of Australian barley. Journal of Cereal Science 21:63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Birch, C.J. and Long, K.E. (1990). Effect of nitrogen on the growth, yield and grain protein content of barley (Hordeum vulgare). Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 30:237–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boonchoo, S., Fukai, S. and Hetherington, E. (1998). Barley yield and grain protein concentration as affected by assimilate and nitrogen availability. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 49: 695–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen, J.X., Zhang, G.P., Qiang, X.L., Wang. J.M. and Ding, S.R. (2002). Cultivar and environmental variation in beta-glucan content in Chinese barleys. Agriculutural Sciences in China 1: 291–297.Google Scholar
  5. Delogu, G., Cattevelli, L., Pecchioni, N., De Falcis, D., Maggiore, T. and Stanca, A.M. (1998). Uptake and agronomic efficiency of nitrogén in winter barley and winter wheat. European Journal of Agronomy 9: 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Doyle, A.D. and Shapland, R.A. (1991). Effect of split nitrogen applications on the yield and protein content of dryland wheat in northem New South Wales. Australian Journal of Experimentál Agriculture 31: 85–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Klepper, B., Rickman, R.W. and Peterson, CM. (1982). Quantitative characterization of vegetative development in cereal grains. Agronomy Journal 74: 789–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Le Gouis, J., Delebarre, O., Beghin, D., Heumez, E. and Pluchard, P. (1999). Nitrogen uptake and utilization efficiency of two-row and six-row winter barley cultivars grown at two N. levels. European Journal of Agronomy 10: 73–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Simmons, S.R., Crooskston, R.K. and Kurle, J.E. (1982). Growth of spring wheat kemels as influenced by reduced kemels per spike and defoliation. Crop Science 22: 983–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Smith, C.J., Freney, J.R., Chapman, S.L. and Galbally, LE. (1989). Fate of urea nitrogen applied to irrigated wheat at heading. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 40: 951–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Swanston, J.S., Ellis, R.P., Perez-Vendrell, A., Voltas, J. and Molina-Cano, J.L. (1997). Patterns of barley grain development in Spain and Scotland and their implications for maiting quality. Cereal Chemistry 74: 456–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Thomas and Fukai, S. (1995). Growth and yield response of barley and chickpea to water stress under three environments in south-east Queensland. I. Light interception, crop growth and grain yield. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 46: 17–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Wang, J.M., Zhang, G.P. and Chen, J.X. (2001). Cultivar and environmental effects on protein content and grain weight of maiting barley. Journal Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences) 27: 503–507.Google Scholar
  14. Weston, D.T., Horsley, R., Schwarz, P.B. and Goos, R.J. (1993). Nitrogen and planting date effect on low-protein spring barley. Agronomy Journal 85: 1170–1174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Zhang, G.P., Chen, J.X. and Ding, S. (2001). Cultivar and environmental effect on (1-3), (1- 4)-beta-D-glucan and protein content in maiting barley. Journal of Cereal Science 34: 295–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2005

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Virender Sardana
    • 1
  • Guo-Ping Zhang
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AgronomyZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations