Advertisement

Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 41, Issue 4, pp 509–518 | Cite as

Assessment of Genetic Diversity in Sorghum Using Phenotypic Markers

  • A. Shegro
  • M. T. LabuschagneEmail author
  • N. Geleta
  • A. Van Biljon
Genetics

Abstract

Sorghum is an important grain crop in many parts of the world, especially in dry regions. It is an important crop for food and feed, and its role in energy production is currently growing. In Ethiopia, sorghum is a multi-purpose crop used for many different functions such as fuel, housing and animal feed. Information on genetic diversity levels among and within sorghum accessions will increase the efficiency of the sorghum improvement programmes. Field experiments were conducted in Potchefstroom, South Africa, during the summer growing seasons of 2009 and 2010, to estimate the level of phenotypic diversity among 22 sorghum accessions. The experiment was laid out in a randomised complete block design with three replications. Nine qualitative and 20 quantitative morphological traits were recorded. Analysis of variance for the quantitative traits revealed that differences among accessions were highly significant for all traits. Qualitative traits diversity index values varied from 31% (panicle compactness and shape) to 84% (glume colour). The pair-wise genetic distances based on phenotypic traits showed varying genetic distances. Cluster analysis of the phenotypic traits resulted in four distinct groups of accessions with genetic distances ranging from 0.40 to 1.59. Therefore, the phenotypic markers provide a useful measure of genetic distances among sorghum accessions to identify potential donors or parental material for future breeding efforts.

Keywords

accessions genetic diversity sorghum qualitative traits quantitative traits 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abdi, A., Bekele, E., Asfaw, Z., Teshome, A. 2002. Lnitative characters in North Shewa and South Welo, Ethiopia. Hereditas 137:161–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrobase 2005. Generation II. Agronomix Software Inc., 71 Waterloo St. Winnipeg, Manitoba R3NOS4, Canada.Google Scholar
  3. Ayana, A., Bekele, E. 2000. Geographical patterns of morphological variation in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) germplasm from Ethiopia and Eritrea: Quantitative characters. Euphytica 115:91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bello, D., Kadams, A.M., Simon, S.Y., Mashi, D.S. 2007. Studies on genetic variability in cultivated sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) cultivars of Adamawa State Nigeria. American-Eurasian J. Agri. Environ. Sci. 2:297–301.Google Scholar
  5. Bucheyekei, T.L., Gwanama, C., Mgonja, M., Chisi, M., Folkertsma, R., Mutegi, R. 2009. Genetic variability characterisation of Tanzania sorghum landraces based on Simple Sequence Repeats (SSR) molecular and morphological markers. Afr. J. Crop Sci. 17:71–86.Google Scholar
  6. Doggett, H. 1988. Sorghum. 2nd ed. Longman Scientific and Technical, New York, N.Y.Google Scholar
  7. Food and Agricultural Organisation (FAO) 2008. FAOSTAT. https://doi.org/faostat.fao.org
  8. Food and Agricultural Organisation (FAO). 2008. FAOSTAT. https://doi.org/faostat.fao.org. Accessed November 2012
  9. Gebrekidan, B. 1981. Salient features of the sorghum breeding strategies used in Ethiopia. Eth. J. Agri. Sci. 3:97–104.Google Scholar
  10. Gomez, K.A., Gomez, A.A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, 2nd ed. A Wiley Interscience Publication. New York, USA.Google Scholar
  11. Hawkes, J.G. 1983. The Diversity of Crop Plants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. IBPGR/ICRISAT 1993. Descriptors for Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench). International Board of Plant Genetics Resources. Rome, Italy/International Crop Research Institute for Semi Arid Tropics, Patancheru, India, pp. 14–26.Google Scholar
  13. Kebede, Y. 1991. The role of Ethiopian germplasm resources in the national breeding programme. In: Engles, J.M., Hawkes, J.G., Werede, M. (eds), Plant Genetic Resources of Ethiopia. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK, pp. 315–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kebede, H., Subudhi, P.K., Rosenow, D.T., Nguyen, H.T. 2001. Quantitative trait loci influencing drought tolerance in grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench). Theor. Appl. Genet. 103:266–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kirleis, A.W., Crosby, K.D. 1982. Sorghum hardness: Comparison of methods for its evaluation. In: Rooney, L.W., Murty, D.S., Mertin, J.V. (eds), Proceedings of international symposium on sorghum grain quality, ICRISAT, Patancheru, India, pp. 231–241.Google Scholar
  16. Kumar, S., Singhania, D.L. 1984. Characters association and analysis in grain sorghum. Sorghum Newsletter 27:16–17.Google Scholar
  17. Mohammadi, S.A., Prasanna, B.M. 2003. Analysis of genetic diversity in crop plants-salient statistical tools and considerations. Review and interpretation. Crop Sci. 43:1235–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Morgan, P.W., Finlayson, S.A. 2000. Physiology and genetics of maturity and height. In: Wayne, S.C. (ed.), Sorghum: Origin, History, Technology and Production. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, USA, p. 227.Google Scholar
  19. NCSS 2004. Number Cruncher Statistical Systems, Dr. Jerry L. Hintze, 329 North 1000 East, Kaysville, Utah 84037, Canada.Google Scholar
  20. Perry, M.C., McIntosh, M.S. 1991. Geographical patterns of variation in the USDA soybean germplasm collection: I. Morphological traits. Crop Sci. 31:1350–1355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shewayrga, H., Jordan, D.R., Godwin, D. 2006. Genetic erosion and changes in distribution of sorghum (Sorghum bicolour (L.) Moench) landraces in north-eastern Ethiopia. Plant Genetic Resources: characterisation and utilisation 6:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stickler, F.C., Weaden, S., Pauli, A.W. 1961. Leaf area determination in grain sorghum. J. Agron. 53:187–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Souza, E., Sorrells, M.E. 1991. Relationships among 70 American oat germplasms. I. Cluster analysis using quantitative characters. Crop Sci. 31:599–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Yetneberk, S., Rooney, L.W., Tylor, J.R.N. 2005. Improving the quality of sorghum injera by decortication and compositing with tef. J. Sci. Food Agric. 85:1252–1258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zongo, J.D., Gouyon, P.H., Sandmeier, M. 1993. Genetic variability among sorghum accessions from the Sahelian agroecological region of Burkina Faso. Biod. Cons. 2:627–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2013

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Shegro
    • 1
    • 2
  • M. T. Labuschagne
    • 1
    Email author
  • N. Geleta
    • 3
  • A. Van Biljon
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Plant SciencesUniversity of the Free StateBloemfonteinSouth Africa
  2. 2.ARC-VOPIPretoriaSouth Africa
  3. 3.ARC-GCIPotchefstroomSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations