Advertisement

Acta Biologica Hungarica

, Volume 65, Issue 2, pp 178–188 | Cite as

Effect of Polyethylene Glycol Induced Drought Stress on Photosynthesis in Two Chickpea Genotypes with Different Drought Tolerance

  • A. SaglamEmail author
  • R. Terzi
  • M. Demiralay
Article

Abstract

Responses of parameters related with photosynthesis and the involvement of various factors in photosynthetic damage in two chickpea genotypes, Gokce (tolerant) and Kusmen (sensitive) under drought stress were assessed. Photosynthetic pigment content decreased under drought stress in two genotypes. Signifcant decreases in gs, Pn and E were determined in Kusmen. No signifcant change in these parameters was measured in Gokce under drought stress. Fv/Fm, ΦPS2 and ETR decreased in drought stressed plants of Kusmen as compared to control plants however Fv/Fm, ΦPS2 and ETR did not change in Gokce under drought stress. Increases in NPQ were determined under stress in both genotypes. Drought stress did not affect rubisco activity and rubisco concentration in Gokce while, the activity and the content declined in Kusmen. The drought tolerance of the Gokce genotype is a consequence of a balance among leaf water potential, stomatal conductance, photosynthesis, and transpiration. On the other hand, photosynthesis in Kusmen may be not only restricted by stomatal limitations but also by non-stomatal limitations under drought stress.

Keywords

Chickpea chlorophyll fuorescence drought photosynthesis rubisco 

Abbreviations

ΦPS2

Effective quantum yield of PS2 photochemistry

Fm

Maximal fuorescence yield in dark-adapted state

Fm

Maximum Chl fuorescence yield in the light adapted state

Fv/Fm

Maximum quan¬tum yield of PS2 photochemistry

Fo

Minimal fuorescence yield in dark-adapted state

Pn

Net photosynthetic rate

NPQ

Non-photochemical quenching

gs

Stomatal conductance

E

Transpiration

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ahmed, S., Nawata, E., Hosokawa, M., Domae, Y., Sakuratani, T. (2002) Alterations in photosynthesis and some antioxidant enzymatic activities of mungbean subjected to waterlogging. Plant Sci. 163, 117–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anonymous (2000) Turkish Republic Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs. General Directorate of Agricultural Research, Center of Crop Plants Research Institute, Species Catalogue, Ankara, 31 p.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arnon, D. (1949) Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts: polyphenol oxidases in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol. 24, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bayoumi, T. Y., Eid, M., Metwali, E. M. (2008) Application of physiological and biochemical indices as a screening technique for drought tolerance in wheat genotypes. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 7, 2341–2352.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blum, A., Ebercon, A. (1981) Cell membrane stability as a measure of drought and heat tolerance in wheat. Crop Sci. 21, 43–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bradford, M. M. (1976) Rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72, 248–254.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dulai, S., Molnar, I., Pronay, J., Csernak, A., Tarnai, R., Molnar Lang, M. (2006) Effects of drought on photosynthetic parameters and heat stability of PSII in wheat and in Aegilops species originating from dry habitats. Acta Biol. Szeged. 50, 11–17.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Duzdemir, O. (2011) Stability analysis for phenological characteristics in chickpea. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 6, 1682–1685.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    El Solh, M. (2011) Enhancing Food Security Under Water Scarcity: The Role of Science and Technology. The 2nd Arab Water Forum, Cairo, Egypt, 20–23 November, 2011.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Genty, B., Briantais, J. M., Baker, N. R. (1989) The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 990, 87–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Güneş, A., Inal, A., Adak, M. S., Bagci, E. G., Cicek, N., Eraslan, F. (2008) Effect of drought stress implemented at pre- or postanthesis stage on some physiological parameters as screening criteria in chickpea cultivars. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 55, 59–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jaspars, E. M. J. (1965) Pigmentation of tobacco crown-gall tissues cultured in vitro in dependence of the composition of the medium. Physiol. Plant. 18, 933–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Khayatnezhad, M., Gholamin, R. (2012) The effect of drought stress on leaf chlorophyll content and stress resistance in maize cultivars (Zea mays). Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 6, 2844–2848.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kholová, J., Hash, C. T., Kakkera, A., Kočová, M., Vadez, V. (2010) Constitutive water conserving mechanisms are correlated with the terminal drought tolerance of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.). J. Exp. Bot. 61, 369–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kholová, J., Hash, C. T., Lava Kumar P., Yadav, R. S., Kočová, M., Vadez, V. (2010) Terminal drought-tolerant pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.) have high leaf ABA and limit transpiration at high vapour pressure deficit. J. Exp. Bot. 61, 1431–1440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Krouma, A. (2010) Plant water relations and photosynthetic activity in three Tunisian chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes subjected to drought. Turk. J. Agric. For. 34, 257–264.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lal, A., Ku, M. S. B., Edwards, G. E. (1996) Analysis of inhibition of photosynthesis due to water stress in C3 species Hordeum vulgare and Vicia faba: Electron transport, CO2 fixation and carboxylation capacity. Photosynth. Res. 49, 57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Liu, C., Liu, Y., Guo, K., Fan, D., Li, G., Zheng, Y., Yu, L., Yang, R. (2011) Effect of drought on pigments, osmotic adjustment and antioxidant enzymes in six woody plant species in karst habitats of southwestern China. Environ. Exp. Bot. 71, 174–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ma, Z., Cooper, C., Kim, H. J., Janick-Buckner, D. (2009) A study of rubisco through western blotting and tissue printing techniques. CBE Life Sci. Educ. 8, 140–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Macar, K. T., Ekmekci, Y. (2008) PSII photochemistry and antioxidant responses of a chickpea variety exposed to drought. Z. Naturforsch. C 63, 583–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Macar, K. T., Ekmekci, Y. (2009) Alterations in photochemical and physiological activities of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars under drought stress. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 195, 335–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mafakheri, A., Siosemardeh, A., Bahramnejad, B., Struik, P. C., Sohrabi, E. (2010) Effect of drought stress on yield, proline and chlorophyll contents in three chickpea cultivars. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 4, 580–585.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Marques da Silva, J., Arrabica, M. C. (1995) Effect of water stress on Rubisco activity of Setaria sphacelota. In: Mathis, P. (ed.) Photosynthesis: From Light to Biosphere. Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, pp. 545–548.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mishra, K. B., Iannacone, R., Petrozza, A., Mishra, A., Armentano, N., La Vecchia, G., Trtílek, M., Cellini, F., Nedbal, L. (2012) Engineered drought tolerance in tomato plants is reflected in chlorophyll fluorescence emission. Plant Sci. 182, 79–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nar, H., Saglam, A., Terzi, R., Varkonyi, Z., Kadioglu, A. (2009) Leaf rolling and photosystem II. Efficiency in Ctenanthe setosa exposed to drought stress. Photosynthetica 47, 429–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pouresmael, M., Khavari-Nejad, R. A., Mozafari, J., Najafi, F., Moradi, F. (2013) Efficiency of screening criteria for drought tolerance in chickpea. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 59, 1675–1693.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rahbarian, R., Khavari-Nejad, R., Ganjeali, A., Bagheri, A., Najafi, F. (2011) Drought stress effects on photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence and water relations in tolerant and susceptible chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes. Acta Biol. Cracov. Bot. 53, 47–55.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Roháček, K., Soukupová, J., Barták, M. (2008) Chlorophyll fluorescence: A wonderful tool to study plant physiology and plant stress. In: Schoefs, B. (ed.) Plant Cell Compartments–Selected Topics. Research Signpost, India, pp. 41–104.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sairam, P. K., Deshmukh, P. S., Shukla, D. S. (1997) Tolerance of drought and temperature stress in relation to increased antioxidant enzyme activity in wheat. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 178, 171–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sawada, S. S., Sato, M., Kasai, A., Yaochi, D., Kameya, Y., Matsumoto, L., Kasai, D. (2003) Analysis of the feed-forward effects of sink activity on the photosynthetic source-sink balance in single-rooted sweet potato leaves. I. Activation of RuBPcase through the development of sinks. Plant Cell Physiol. 44, 190–197.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Siddique, M. R. B., Hamid, A., Islam, M. S. (2000) Drought stress effects on water relations of wheat. Bot. Bull. Acad. Sin. 41, 35–39.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Singh, R., Sharma, P., Varshney, R. K., Sharma, S. K., Singh, N. K. (2008) Chickpea improvement: Role of wild species and genetic markers. Biotechnol. Genet. Eng. 25, 267–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Slavick, B. (1974) Methods of Studying Plant Water Relations. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, p. 449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Xu, Z. Z., Zhou, G. S., Wang, Y. L., Han, G. X., Li, Y. J. (2008) Changes in chlorophyll fluorescence in maize plants with imposed rapid dehydration at different leaf ages. J. Plant Growth Regul. 27, 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yordanov, I., Tsonev, T., Velikova, V., Georgieva, K., Ivanov, P., Tsenov, N., Petrova, T. (2001) Changes in CO2 assimilation, transpiration and stomatal resistance of different wheat cultivars experiencing drought under field conditions. Bulg. J. Plant Physiol. 27, 20–33.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zaman-Allah, M., Jenkinson, D. M., Vadez, V. (2011) Chickpea genotypes contrasting for seed yield under terminal drought stress in the field differ for traits related to the control of water use. Funct. Plant. Biol. 38, 270–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zlatev, Z. S., Yordanov, I. T. (2004) Effects of soil drought on photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence in bean plants. Bulg. J. Plant Physiol. 30, 3–18.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó Zrt. 2014

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Faculty of SciencesKaradeniz Technical UniversityTrabzonTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Biology, Faculty of SciencesKaradeniz Technical UniversityTrabzonTurkey

Personalised recommendations