Big fish eat small fish: implications for food chain length?
- 4 Downloads
Food chains in the pelagic zones of oceans and lakes are longer than in terrestrial ecosystems. The perception of the pelagic food web has become increasingly complex by progressing from a linear food chain (phytoplankton — crustacean zooplankton — planktivorous fish — predatory fish) to a food web because of an increasing appreciation of microbial trophic pathways, side-tracks by gelatinous zooplankton and a high prevalence of omnivory. The range of predator:prey size ratios by far exceeds the traditionally assumed range of 10:1 to 100:1, from almost equal length to 105:1. The size ratios between primary consumers and top predators are 3½ orders of magnitude bigger in pelagic than in terrestrial food webs. Comparisons between different pelagic ecosystems support ecosystem size as an important factor regulating the maximal trophic level, while energy limitation of the number of trophic levels is less well supported. An almost 1:1 relationship between ingestion by predators and prey mortality and a better chemical match between primary producer and herbivore biomass are further distinctive features of the pelagic food web whose role in explaining the higher number of trophic levels in pelagic systems needs further examination.
KeywordsBody size Food web Nekton Pelagic Plankton Trophic level
Dissolved Organic Carbon
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Basedow, S.L., N.A.L. de Silva, A. Bode and J. van Beusekom. 2016. The trophic positions of mesozooplankton across the North Atlantic: estimates derived from biovolume theories and stable isotope analysis. J. Plankton Res. 38:1364–1378.Google Scholar
- Bedo, A., L. Acuña, D. Robin and R. Harris. 1993. Grazing in the micron and the sub-micron particle size range: the case of Oikopleura dioica (Appendicularia). Bull. Mar. Sci. 53:2–14.Google Scholar
- Caron, D.A., H.G. Dam, P. Kremer, E.J. Lessard EJ, L.P. Madin, T.C. Malone, J.M. Napp, E.R. Peele, M.R. Roman and M.J. Youngbluth. 1995. The contribution of microorganisms to particulate carbon and nitrogen in surface waters of the Sargasso Sea near Bermuda. Deep-Sea Res. I 42:943–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Elton, C.S. 1927. Animal Ecology. Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
- Hunt, B. P.V., V. Allain, C. Menkes, A. Lorrain, B. Graham, M. Rodier, M. Pagano and F. Carlotti. 2015. A coupled stable isotope-size spectrum approach to understanding pelagic food-web dynamics: a case study from the southwest sub-tropical Pacific. Deep Sea Res. Part II 113:208–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ismar, S.M.H., J. Kottmann and U. Sommer. 2018. First genetic quantification of sex- and stage-specific feeding in the ubiquitous copepod Acartia tonsa. Mar. Biol. Submitted.Google Scholar
- Sommer, U., E. Charalampous, S. Genitsaris and M. Moustaka-Gouni. 2017. Costs, benefits and taxonomic distribution of phytoplankton body size. J. Plankton Res. 39:494–508.Google Scholar
- Sommer, U., T. Hansen, O. Blum, N. Holzner, O. Vadstein and H. Stibor. 2005. Copepod and microzooplankton grazing n mesocosms fertilised with different Si:N ratios: no overlap between food spectra and Si:N-influence on zooplankton trophic level. Oecologia 142:274–283.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Tait, R.V. 1981. Elements of Marine Ecology. 3rd ed. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
- Whittaker, R.H. 1975. Communities and Ecosystems. 2nd ed., Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.