Interaction between habitat limitation and dispersal limitation is modulated by species life history and external conditions: a stochastic matrix model approach

Abstract

Traditionally, species absence in a community is ascribed either to dispersal limitation (i.e., the inability of propagules of a species to reach a site) or to habitat limitation (abiotic or biotic conditions of a site prevent species from forming a viable population); sowing experiments can then distinguish between these two mechanisms. In our view, the situation is even more complicated. To demonstrate the complexity of the problem, we designed and applied simulations based on an extension of matrix models covering effects of propagule pressure and habitat limitation, and reflecting various characteristics of a species and of a habitat. These included life history, fecundity, seed bank viability of a species, habitat carrying capacity and disturbances. All the investigated factors affected proportion of occupied habitats. Whereas they can, to a large extent, compensate for each other, simultaneous decrease of habitat suitability and propagule input can be detrimental to the survival of a population. Our model demonstrated that in many cases, the absence of a species in a community is of stochastic nature, and result of interaction of species life history and various external conditions, and thus cannot be simply attributed to a single cause. The model results are supported with examples of case studies. The results also explain some well-known ecological phenomena, as decrease of niche breadth from the center to the margins of area of distribution. Finally, the model also suggests some caveats in interpretation of the results of sowing experiments.

References

  1. Baeten, L., Hermy, M. and Verheyen, K. 2009. Environmental limitation contributes to the differential colonization capacity of two forest herbs. J. Veg. Sci. 20:209–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Blažek, P. and Lepš, J. 2015. Victims of agricultural intensification: mowing date affects Rhinanthus spp. regeneration and fruit ripening. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 211:10–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brown, J.H. 1984. On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. Am. Nat. 124:255–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Candeias, M. and Warren, R.J. II 2016. Rareness starts early for disturbance-dependent grassland plant species. Biodivers.Conserv. 25:2771–2785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Caswell, H. 2001. Matrix Population Models: Construction, Analysis and Interpretation, 2nd Edition. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Clark, C.J., Poulsen, J.R., Levey, D.J. and Osenberg, C.W. 2007. Are plant populations seed limited? A critique and meta-analysis of seed addition experiments. Am. Nat. 170:128–142.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Clark, J.S., Lewis, M. and Horvath, M. 2001. Invasion by extremes: variation in dispersal and reproduction retards population spread. Am. Nat. 157:537–554.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Dubois, D. and Prade, H. 1988. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dupré, C. and Ehrlén, J. 2002. Habitat configuration, species traits and plant distributions. J. Ecol. 90:796–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ehrlén, J., Münzbergová, Z., Diekmann, M. and Eriksson, O. 2006. Long-term assessment of seed limitation in plants: results from an 11-year experiment. J. Ecol. 94:1224–1232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fibich, P., Vítová, A., Macek, P. and Lepš, J. 2013. Establishment and spatial associations of recruits in meadow gaps. J. Veg. Sci. 24:496–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Foster, B.L. 2001. Constraints on colonization and species richness along a grassland productivity gradient: the role of propagule availability. Ecol. Letters 4:530–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Foster, B.L. and Tilman, D. 2003. Seed limitation and the regulation of community structure in oak savanna grassland. J. Ecol. 91:999–1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gaston, K.J. and Lawton, J.H. 1990. Effects of scale and habitat on the relationship between regional distribution and local abundance. Oikos 58:329–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gómez-Aparicio, L. 2008. Spatial patterns of recruitment in Mediterranean plant species: linking the fate of seeds, seedlings and saplings in heterogeneous landscapes at different scales. J. Ecol. 96:1128–1140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Grime, J.P. 1998. Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects. J. Ecol. 86:902–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Grubb, P.J. 1977. The maintenance of species-richness in plant communities – importance of regeneration niche. Biol. Rev. 52:107–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gustafsson, C.H. and Ehrlén, J. 2002. Seed availability and recruitment of the perennial herb Sanicula europea. Ecoscience 9:526–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hanski, I. 1997. Metapopulation dynamics: from concepts and observations to predictive models. In.: Hanski, I., Gilpin, M. (eds) Metapopulation Biology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 69–91.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hanski, I. 2004. Metapopulation theory, its use and misuse. Basic Appl. Ecol. 5:225–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Harper, J.L. 1977. Population Biology of Plants. Academic Press, London.

  22. Hellström, K., Ari-Pekka, H., Pasi, R. and Juha, T. 2009. Seed introduction and gap creation facilitate restoration of meadow species richness. J. Nature Cons. 17:236–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Herben, T. Nováková, Z. and Klimešová, J. 2014. Clonal growth and plant species abundance. Ann. Bot. 114:377–388.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Hölzel, N. 2005. Seedling recruitment in flood-meadow species: The effects of gaps, litter and vegetation matrix. Appl. Veg. Sci. 8:115–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jakobsson, A. and Eriksson, O. 2000. A comparative study of seed number, seed size, seedling size and recruitment in grassland plants. Oikos 88:494–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Karrenberg, S., Edwards, P.J. and Kollmann, J. 2002. The life history of Salicaceae living in the active zone of floodplains. Freshwater Biol. 47:733–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kelemen, A., Lazzaro, L., Besnyői, V., Albert, Á. J., Konečná, M., Dobay, G., Memelink, I., Adamec, V., Götzenberger, L., de Bello, F., Le Bagousse-Pinguet, Y. and Lepš, J. 2015. Net outcome of competition and facilitation in a wet meadow changes with plant’s life stage and community productivity. Preslia 87:347–361.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Klimeš, L. 2005. A transient expansion of sown plants and diaspore limitation. Folia Geobot. 40:69–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Krahulec, F. and Lepš, J. 1994. Establishment success of plant immigrants in a new water reservoir. Folia Geobot. 29:3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lewis, R. J., Bello, F., Bennett, J. A., Fibich, P., Finerty, G. E., Götzenberger, L., Hiiesalu, I., Kasari, L., Lepš, J., Májeková, M., Mudrák, O., Riibak, K., Ronk, A., Rychtecká, T., Vitová, A. and Pärtel, M. 2017. Applying the dark diversity concept to nature conservation. Conservation Biol., 31, 40–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lowry, E., Rollinson, E.J., Laybourn, A.J., Scott, T.E., Aiello-Lammens, M.E., Gray, S.M., Mickley, J. and Gurevitch, J. 2013. Biological invasions: a field synopsis, systematic review, and database of the literature. Ecol. Evol. 3:182–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Moles, A.T. and Westoby, M. 2002. Seed addition experiments are more likely to increase recruitment in larger-seeded species. Oikos 99:241–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Moles, A.T. and Westoby, M. 2004. What do seedlings die from and what are the implications for evolution of seed size? Oikos 106:193–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Moore, K.A. and Elmendorf, S.C. 2006. Propagule vs. niche limitation: untangling the mechanisms behind plant species distributions. Ecol. Lett. 9:797–804.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Mudrák, O., Mládek, J., Blažek, P., Lepš, J., Doležal, J., Nekvapilová, E. and Těšitel, J. 2014. Establishment of hemiparasitic Rhinanthus spp. in grassland restoration: lessons learned from sowing experiments. Appl. Veg. Sci. 17:274–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Münzbergová, Z. 2004 Effect of spatial scale on factors limiting species distributions in dry grassland fragments. J. Ecol. 92:854–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Münzbergová, Z. 2012. Seed density significantly affects species richness and composition in experimental plant communities. PLoS ONE 7:e46704.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Münzbergová, Z. and Herben, T. 2005. Seed, dispersal, microsite, habitat and recruitment limitation: identification of terms and concepts in studies of limitations. Oecologia 145:1–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Orrock, J.L., Levey, D.J., Danielson, B.J. and Damschen, E.I. 2006. Seed predation, not seed dispersal, explains the landscape-level abundance of an early-successional plant. J. Ecol. 94:838–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Öster, M. and Eriksson, O. 2012. Recruitment in species-rich grasslands: the effects of functional traits and propagule pressure. J. Plant Ecol. 5:260–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Öster, M., Ask, K., Cousins, S.A.O. and Eriksson, O. 2009. Dispersal and establishment limitation reduces the potential for successful restoration of semi-natural grassland communities on former arable fields. J. Appl. Ecol. 46:1266–1274.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Pärtel, M. 2014. Community ecology of absent species: hidden and dark diversity. J. Veg. Sci. 25:1154–1159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Pärtel, M., Szava-Kovats, R. and Zobel, M. 2011. Dark diversity: shedding light on absent species. Trends in Ecol. & Evol. 26:124–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Pásztor, L., Botta-Dukát, Z., Magyar, G., Czárán, T. and Meszéna, G. 2016. Theory-Based Ecology: a Darwinian Approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  45. Primack, R.B. and Miao, S.L. 1992. Dispersal can limit local plant distribution. Cons. Biol. 6: 513–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Sádlo, J. 2009. Erythronium dens-canis v Čechách: uvěříme původnosti? [Erythronium dens-canis in Bohemia: can we accept its native origin? In Czech.] Zprávy České Botanické Společnosti 44:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Silvertown, J. and Charlesworth, D. 2001. Introduction to Plant Population Biology. Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Šourek, J. 1969. Květena Krkonoš. [Flora of the Krkonoše Mts. In Czech.] Academia, Praha.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Špačková, I. and Lepš, J. 2004. Variability of seedling recruitment under dominant, moss and litter removal over four years. Folia Geobot 39:41–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Stampfli, A. and Zeiter, M. 2008. Mechanisms of structural change derived from patterns of seedling emergence and mortality in a semi-natural meadow. J. Veg. Sci. 19:563–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Švamberková, E., Vítová, A. and Lepš, J. 2017. The role of biotic interactions in plant community assembly: What is the community species pool? Acta Oecologica 85:150–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Tanentzap, A.J. and Bazely, D.R. 2009. Propagule pressure and resource availability determine plant community invasibility in a temperate forest understorey Oikos 118:300–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Thompson, K., Bakker, J.P., Bekker, R.M. and Hodgson, J.G. 1998. Ecological correlates of seed persistence in soil in the north-west European flora. J. Ecol. 86:163–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Turnbull, L.A., Crawley, M.J. and Rees, M. 2000. Are plant populations seed-limited? A review of seed sowing experiments. Oikos 88:225–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Vellend, M. 2016. The Theory of Ecological Communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  56. Vítová, A. and Lepš, J. 2011. Experimental assessment of dispersal and habitat limitation in an oligotrophic wet meadow. Plant Ecol. 212:1231–1242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Vítová, A., Macek, P. and Lepš, J. 2017. Disentangling the interplay of generative and vegetative propagation among different functional groups during gap colonization in meadows. Funct. Ecol. 31:458–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Wellstein, C, Campetella, G., Spada, F., Chelli, S., Mucina, L., Canullo, R. and Bartha, S. 2014. Context-dependent assembly rules and the role of dominating grasses in semi-natural abandoned sub-Mediterranean grasslands. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ 182:113–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Zobel, M. Otsus, M., Liira, J., Moora, M. and Möls, T. 2000. Is smallscale species richness limited by seed availability or microsite availability? Ecology 81:3274–3282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Our work is supported by the Czech Science Foundation, project GB14-36079G (Centre of Excellence PLADIAS) and grant 17-05506S. Access to computing and storage facilities owned by parties and projects contributing to the National Grid Infrastructure MetaCentrum provided under the programme “Projects of Large Research, Development, and Innovations Infrastructures” (CESNET LM2015042), is greatly appreciated. We thank to F. de Bello for highly valuable comments and suggestions to the manuscript and to C. Redmond for language improvement.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Fibich.

Supplementary materials

Rights and permissions

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fibich, P., Vítová, A. & Lepš, J. Interaction between habitat limitation and dispersal limitation is modulated by species life history and external conditions: a stochastic matrix model approach. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 19, 9–20 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1556/168.2018.19.1.2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Annuals
  • Carrying capacity
  • Dispersal limitation
  • Habitat limitation
  • Perennials
  • Seed bank