Conservation of species is often focused either only on those that are endangered, or on maximising the number recorded on species lists. However, species share space and time with others, thus interacting and building frameworks of relationships that can be unravelled by community-level network analysis. It is these relationships that ultimately drive ecosystem function via the transfer of energy and nutrients. However interactions are rarely considered in conservation planning. Network analysis can be used to detect key species (“hubs”) that play an important role in cohesiveness of networks. We applied this approach to plant-pollinator communities on two montane Northern Apennine grasslands, paying special attention to the modules and the identity of hubs. We performed season-wide sampling and then focused the network analyses on time units consistent with plant phenology. After testing for significance of modules, only some modules were found to be significantly segregated from others. Thus, networks were organized around a structured core of modules with a set of companion species that were not organized into compartments. Using a network approach we obtained a list of important plant and pollinator species, including three Network Hubs of utmost importance, and other hubs of particular biogeographical interest. By having a lot of links and high partner diversity, hubs should convey stability to networks. Due to their role in the networks, taking into account such key species when considering the management of sites could help to preserve the greatest number of interactions and thus support many other species.
Principal Component Analysis
Albert, R., H. Jeong and A.L. Barabasi. 2000. Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature 406: 378–382.
Almeida-Neto, M., P. Guimarães, P.R. Guimarães, R.D. Loyola and W. Ulrich. 2008. A consistent metric for nestedness analysis in ecological systems: reconciling concept and measurement. Oikos 117: 1227–1239.
Anderson, M.J. 2001. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol. 26: 32–46.
Arroyo, M.T.K., J.J. Armesto and R.B. Primack. 1985. Community studies in pollination ecology in the high temperate Andes of central Chile II. Effect of temperature on visitation rates and pollination possibilities. Plant Syst. Evol. 149: 187–203.
Barcella, M. 2013. Montane grasslands of the Northern Apennine: syntaxonomy, synchorology, sinecology, pasture analysis and pasture modeling. Unpublished PhD thesis. Università di Pavia.
Bascompte, J., P. Jordano and J.M. Olesen. 2006. Asymmetric coevolutionary networks facilitate biodiversity maintenance. Science 312: 431–433.
Basilio, A.M., D. Medan, J.P. Torretta and N.J. Bartoloni. 2006. A year-long plant-pollinator network. Austral Ecol. 31: 975–983.
Blüthgen, N., F. Menzel and N. Blüthgen. 2006. Measuring specialization in species interaction networks. BMC Ecol. 6: 9.
Burgos, E., H. Ceva, R.P.J. Perazzo, M. Devoto, D. Medan, M. Zimmermann and A. María Delbue. 2007. Why nestedness in mutualistic networks? J. Theor. Biol. 249: 307–313.
Corbet, S. A. 2000. Conserving compartments in pollination webs. Conserv. Biol. 14: 1229–1231.
de Jong, Y., M. Verbeek, V. Michelsen, P.d.P. Bjørn, W. Los, F. Steeman, N. Bailly et al. 2014. Fauna Europaea–all European animal species on the web. Biodiversity Data Journal 2: e4034.
Dormann, C.F., B. Gruber and J. Fruend. 2008. Introducing the bipartite package: Analysing ecological networks. R news 8: 8–11.
Dormann, C.F. and R. Strauss. 2014. A method for detecting modules in quantitative bipartite networks. Methods Ecol. Evol. 5: 90–98.
Dupont, Y.L., D.M. Hansen and J.M. Olesen. 2003. Structure of a plant–flower-visitor network in the high-altitude sub-alpine desert of Tenerife, Canary Islands. Ecography 26: 301–310.
Faegri, K. and L. van der Pijl. 1979. The Principles of Pollination Ecology. Pergamon Press, Paris.
Fang, Q. and S.-Q. Huang. 2012. Relative stability of core groups in pollination networks in a biodiversity hotspot over four years. PLoS ONE 7: e32663.
Fantinato, E., S. Del Vecchio, A. Slaviero, L. Conti, A.T.R. Acosta and G. Buffa. 2016. Does flowering synchrony contribute to the sustainment of dry grassland biodiversity? Flora - Morphol. Distrib. Funct. Ecol. Plants 222: 96–103.
Goulson, D., E. Nicholls, C. Botías and E.L. Rotheray. 2015. Bee declines driven by combined stress from parasites, pesticides, and lack of flowers. Science 347: 1255957.
Guimarães, P.R. and P. Guimarães. 2006. Improving the analyses of nestedness for large sets of matrices. Environ. Model. Softw. 21: 1512–1513.
Guimerà, R. and L. A. N. Amaral. 2005. Functional cartography of complex metabolic networks. Nature 433: 895–900.
Guimerà, R., M. Sales-Pardo and L.A.N. Amaral. 2007. Classes of complex networks defined by role-to-role connectivity profiles. Nat. Phys. 3: 63–69.
Hammer, Ø., D.A.T. Harper and P.D. Ryan. 2001. PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Paleontol. Electrónica 4: 1–9.
Hegland, S.J., A. Nielsen, A. Lázaro, A.-L. Bjerknes and Ø. Totland. 2009. How does climate warming affect plant-pollinator interactions? Ecol. Lett. 12: 184–195.
Janzen, D.H. 1974. The deflowering of Central America. La deforestación de Centroamérica. Nat. Hist. 83: 48–53.
Jeong, H., S.P. Mason, A.-L. Barabási and Z.N. Oltvai. 2001. Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature 411: 41–42.
Jordano, P., J. Bascompte and J.M. Olesen. 2006. The ecological consequences of complex topology and nested structure in pollination webs. In: N.M. Waser and J. Ollerton (eds.), Plant-Pollinator Interactions: From Specialization to Generalization. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. pp. 173–199.
Kaiser-Bunbury, C.N. and N. Blüthgen. 2015. Integrating network ecology with applied conservation: a synthesis and guide to implementation. AoB Plants 7: plv076.
Kaiser-Bunbury, C.N., S. Muff, J. Memmott, C.B. Müller and A. Caflisch. 2010. The robustness of pollination networks to the loss of species and interactions: a quantitative approach incorporating pollinator behaviour. Ecol. Lett. 13: 442–452.
Larson, D.L., S. Droege, P.A. Rabie, J.L. Larson, J. Devalez, M. Haar and M. McDermott-Kubeczko. 2014. Using a network modularity analysis to inform management of a rare endemic plant in the northern Great Plains, USA. J. Appl. Ecol. 51: 1024–1032.
Martín González, A.M., S. Allesina, A. Rodrigo and J. Bosch. 2012. Drivers of compartmentalization in a Mediterranean pollination network. Oikos 121: 2001–2013.
Martín González, A.M., B. Dalsgaard and J.M. Olesen. 2010. Centrality measures and the importance of generalist species in pollination networks. Ecol. Complex. 7: 36–43.
Miller-Struttmann, N.E. and C. Galen. 2014. High-altitude multi-taskers: bumble bee food plant use broadens along an altitudinal productivity gradient. Oecologia 176: 1033–1045.
Olesen, J.M., J. Bascompte, Y.L. Dupont and P. Jordano. 2007. The modularity of pollination networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104: 19891–19896.
Olesen, J.M. and P. Jordano. 2002. Geographic patterns in plant–pollinator mutualistic networks. Ecology 83: 2416–2424.
Ollerton, J., H. Erenler, M. Edwards and R. Crockett. 2014. Extinctions of aculeate pollinators in Britain and the role of large-scale agricultural changes. Science 346: 1360–1362.
Ollerton, J., R. Winfree and S. Tarrant. 2011. How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals? Oikos 120: 321–326.
Paraskevopoulou, S., N. Monokrousos, I. Kappas and T.J. Abatzopoulos. 2015. Spatio-temporal variability of benthic macrofauna in a coastal lagoon assessed by ecological interaction networks. Community Ecol. 16: 10–22.
Pozsgai, G., J. Baird, N.A. Littlewood, R.J. Pakeman and M. Young. 2015. Interspecific networks in ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) assemblages. Ecol. Indic. 68: 134–141.
Ramos-Jiliberto, R., D. Domínguez, C. Espinoza, G. López, F.S. Valdovinos, R.O. Bustamante and R. Medel. 2010. Topological change of Andean plant–pollinator networks along an altitudinal gradient. Ecol. Complex. 7: 86–90.
Rasmussen, C., Y.L. Dupont, J.B. Mosbacher, K. Trøjelsgaard and J.M. Olesen. 2013. Strong impact of temporal resolution on the structure of an ecological network. PLoS ONE 8: e81694.
Reis, S.D.S., Y. Hu, A. Babino, J.S. Andrade Jr, S. Canals, M. Sigman and H.A. Makse. 2014. Avoiding catastrophic failure in correlated networks of networks. Nat. Phys. 10: 762–767.
Reitan, T. and A. Nielsen. 2016. Do not divide count data with count data; A story from pollination ecology with implications beyond. PLOS ONE 11: e0149129.
Rivera-Hutinel, A., R.O. Bustamante, V.H. Marín and R. Medel. 2012. Effects of sampling completeness on the structure of plant–pollinator networks. Ecology 93: 1593–1603.
Santamaría, S., J. Galeano, J.M. Pastor and M. Méndez. 2016. Removing interactions, rather than species, casts doubt on the high robustness of pollination networks. Oikos 125: 526–534.
Seifert, B. 2004 The “Black Bog Ant” Formica picea Nylander, 1846–a species different from Formica candida Smith, 1878 (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecologische Nachrichten 6: 29–38.
Tarrant, S., J. Ollerton, M.L. Rahman, J. Tarrant and D. McCollin. 2013. Grassland restoration on landfill sites in the East Midlands, United Kingdom: an evaluation of floral resources and pollinating insects. Restor. Ecol. 21: 560–568.
The Plant List. 2013. Version 1.1. Published on the Internet; http://www.theplantlist.org/. Accessed on June 20th 2016.
Tylianakis, J.M., E. Laliberté, A. Nielsen and J. Bascompte. 2010. Conservation of species interaction networks. Biol. Conserv. 143: 2270–2279.
Valverde, J., J.M. Gómez and F. Perfectti. 2016. The temporal dimension in individual-based plant pollination networks. Oikos 125: 468–479.
Verde, S., S. Assini and C. Andreis. 2010. Le serie di Vegetazione della regione Lombardia. In: C. Blasi (ed.), La Vegetazione d’Italia. Palombi & Partner, Roma. pp. 53–82.
Viterbi, R., C. Cerrato, B. Bassano, R. Bionda, A. Hardenberg, A. Provenzale and G. Bogliani. 2013. Patterns of biodiversity in the northwestern Italian Alps: a multi-taxa approach. Community Ecol. 14: 18–30.
Watts, S., C.F. Dormann, A.A.M. González and J. Ollerton. 2016. The influence of floral traits on specialisation and modularity of plant-pollinator networks in a biodiversity hotspot in the Peruvian Andes. Ann. Bot. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcw114.
Zhao, Y.-H., Z.-X. Ren, A. Lázaro, H. Wang, P. Bernhardt, H.-D. Li and D.-Z. Li. 2016. Floral traits influence pollen vectors’ choices in higher elevation communities in the Himalaya-Hengduan Mountains. BMC Ecol. 16: 26.
Electronic supplementary material
About this article
Cite this article
Biella, P., Ollerton, J., Barcella, M. et al. Network analysis of phenological units to detect important species in plant-pollinator assemblages: can it inform conservation strategies?. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 18, 1–10 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1556/168.2017.18.1.1
- Community analysis
- Ecological network
- Habitat management
- The Plant List (2013) for plants
- Seifert (2004) for Hymenoptera: Formicidae and de Jong et al. (2014) for other insects