Patterns of plant species richness and composition in deciduous oak forests in relation to environmental drivers
Local plant species richness and composition may vary across habitats and between plant taxonomic groups within temperate deciduous forests. Multi-taxon approach is therefore needed to provide a more detailed insight into determinants affecting vegetation structure. Fifty-four deciduous oak-dominated vegetation plots (20 m × 20 m) were sampled across central Slovakia (Štiavnické vrchy Mts) in order to study the effect of environmental (soil, light, topographic) factors on species richness and composition patterns of two main assemblages of understorey layer (herb-layer vascular plants and ground-dwelling bryophytes). The number of recorded herb-layer vascular plants and ground-dwelling bryophytes was 12–48 (mean 28) and 0–11 (mean 4) species per plot, respectively. Generalized linear model revealed that species richness of herb-layer vascular plants was driven by canopy openness, altitude, soil pH/base saturation gradient and plant-available phosphorus. Canopy openness and heat load index accompanied by soil pH/base saturation gradient determined changes of the ground-dwelling bryophyte richness. Canonical Correspondence Analysis identified soil pH/base saturation gradient, canopy openness, soil silt and topography related predictors (altitude, slope, radiation) as the main drivers of the herb-layer vascular plant compositional variability. Species composition variation of ground-dwelling bryophytes was controlled by radiation and canopy openness.
KeywordsAlpha diversity Bryophytes Deciduous oak forests Light conditions Soil chemistry Topography Vascular plants
Canonical Correspondence Analysis
Generalized Linear Model
Principal Component Analysis
NomenclatureMarhold and Hindák (1998) for vascular plants and bryophytes
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Andersson, M. 1988. Toxicity and tolerance of aluminium in vascular plants. A review. Water Air Soil Pollut. 39: 439–462.Google Scholar
- Axmanová, I., M. Chytrý, D. Zelený, C.F. Li, M. Vymazalová, J. Danihelka, M. Horsák, M. Kočí, S. Kubešová, Z. Lososová, Z. Otýpková, L. Tichý, V.B. Martynenko, E.Z. Baisheva, B. Schuster and M. Diekmann. 2012. The species richness-productivity relationship in the herb layer of European deciduous forests. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 21: 657–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bates, J.W. 2009. Mineral nutrition and substratum ecology. In: Goffinet, B. and A.J. Shaw (eds.), Bryophyte Biology. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge. pp. 299–356.Google Scholar
- Ellenberg, H. 2009. Vegetation Ecology of Central Europe. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Frazer, G.W., CD. Canham and K.P Lertzman. 1999. Gap Light Analyzer (GLA), Version 2.0. Imaging software to extract canopy structure and gap light transmission indices from true-colour fisheye photographs, user’s manual and program documentation. Simon Fraser Univ., Burnaby, British Columbia.Google Scholar
- Gilliam, FS. 2007. The ecological significance of the herbaceous layer in temperate forest ecosystems. BioScience 57: 845–858.Google Scholar
- Marhold, K. and F. Hindák (eds.) 1998. Checklist of Non-vascular and Vascular Plants of Slovakia. Veda, Bratislava.Google Scholar
- Proctor, M.C.F. 1981. Physiological ecology of bryophytes. Adv. Bryol. 1: 79–166.Google Scholar
- Szymura, T.H. and M. Szymura. 2011. Soil properties and light availability determine species richness and vegetation diversity in an overgrown coppice oak stand. Pol. J. Ecol. 59: 523–533.Google Scholar
- van der Hoeven, E. and H.J. During. 1997. Positive and negative interactions in bryophyte populations. In: de Kroon, H. and J. van Groenendael (eds.), The Ecology and Evolution of Clonal Plants. Leiden, Backhuys, pp. 291–310.Google Scholar
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.