The behavioral basis for habitat selection has been intensively studied, but comparatively little attention has been paid to how the resultant species assemblages are formed or affected. Further, how habitat quality interacts with behavior during habitat selection needs greater exploration. We sought to identify some of the behavioral interactions influencing the development of bird assemblages in agricultural habitats, which we consider a structurally simple model system. We performed point counts in non-cultivated meadows, intensive agriculture, and non-intensive agriculture areas in the 2011 and 2012 breeding seasons in which we particularly focussed on Bobolink (Dolichonyx oryzivorus), Eastern Meadowlark (Sturnella magna), Field Sparrow (Spizella pusilla), Grasshopper Sparrow (Ammodramus savannarum), Savannah Sparrow (Passerculus sandwichensis), and Vesper Sparrow (Pooecetus gramineus). Using presence-absence matrices and EcoSim software on 2011 census data, we determined where competition was likely to occur, and which species were competing. In 2012, we experimentally tested these relationships by introducing artificial competitors onto sites. We implemented a before-after control-impact study by comparing presence-absence data from 2011 to 2012 and using multinomial logistic regression. We found grassland bird assemblages are structured by interspecific competition or attraction. The experimental introduction of Grasshopper Sparrows resulted in several presence/absence changes, which differed based on habitat quality, by conspecifics and four heterospecifics (especially Bobolinks). We speculate that the response to competitors is actually determined by the relative quality of each habitat type for each species.
degrees of freedom
Field Sparrow decoy and playback
Grasshopper Sparrow decoy and playback
Ahlering, M.A. and J. Faaborg. 2006. Avian habitat management meets conspecific attraction: If you build it, will they come? Auk 123: 301–312.
Ahlering, M.A., D.H. Johnson and J. Faaborg. 2006. Conspecific attraction in a grassland bird, the Baird’s Sparrow. J. Field Ornithol. 77: 365–371
Ahlering, M.A., D. Arlt, M.G. Betts, R.J. Fletcher Jr., J.J. Nocera and M.P. Ward. 2010. Research needs and recommendations for the use of conspecific attraction – Methods in the conservation of migratory songbirds. Condor 112: 252–264.
Askins, R.A. 1993. Population trends in grassland, shrubland, and forest birds in eastern North America. Curr. Ornithol. 11: 1–34
Askins, R.A. 2000. Restoring North America’s Birds: Lessons from landscape ecology. Yale University Press. New Haven, CT, USA.
Betts, M.G., A.S. Hadley, N. Rodenhouse and J.J. Nocera. 2008. Social information trumps vegetation structure in breeding-site selection by a migrant songbird. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B Biol. 275: 2257–2263.
Betts, M.G., J.J. Nocera and A.S. Hadley. 2010. Settlement in novel habitats induced by social information may disrupt community structure. Condor 112: 265–273.
Boren, J.C., D.M. Engle and R.E. Masters. 1997. Vegetation cover type and avian species changes on landscapes within a wildland-urban interface. Ecol. Model.103: 251–266
Bruno, J.F., J.J. Stachowicz and M.D. Bertness. 2003. Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18: 119–125.
Carey, M., D.E. Burhans and D.A. Nelson. 2008. Field Sparrow (Spizella pusilla). In: A. Poole (ed.), Birds N Am Online. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York.
Cavitt, J.F. and C.A. Haas. 2000. Brown Thrasher (Toxostoma rufum). In: A. Poole (ed.), Birds N Am Online. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York.
Connor, E.F. and D. Simberloff. 1979. The assembly of species communities: chance or competition? Ecology 60: 1132–1140.
Conover, R.R., S.J. Dinsmore and J.W. Burger. 2011. Effects of conservation practices on bird nest density and survival in intensive agriculture. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 141: 126–132.
COSSARO. 2010. COSSARO Candidate Species at Risk Evaluation Form for Bobolink (Dolichonyx oryzivorus). 1–7.
COSSARO. 2011. COSSARO Candidate Species at Risk Evaluation Form for Eastern Meadowlark (Sturnella magna). 1–15.
Elton, C. 1946. Competition and the structure of ecological communities. J. Anim. Ecol. 15: 54–68.
Entsminger, G.L. 2012. EcoSim Professional: Null modeling software for ecologists, Version 1. Acquired Intelligence Inc., Kesey-Bear, & Pinyon Publishing. Montrose, CO. http://www.garyentsminger.com/ecosim/index.htm
Fletcher, R.J. Jr. 2006. Emergent properties of conspecific attraction in fragmented landscapes. Am. Nat. 168: 207–219.
Fletcher, R.J. Jr. 2007. Species interactions and population density mediate the use of social cues for habitat selection. J. Anim. Ecol. 76: 598–606.
Forsman, J.T., J.T. Seppänen and M. Mönkkönen. 2002. Positive fitness consequences of interspecific interaction with a potential competitor. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B Biol. 269: 1619–1623.
Gotelli, N.J. 2000. Null model analysis of species co-occurrence patterns. Ecology 81: 2606–2621.
Hardin, G. 1960. The competitive exclusion principle. Science 131: 1292–1297.
Heckenlively, D.B. 1976. Cadence of Field Sparrow songs. Wilson Bull. 88: 588–602.
Jaster, L.A., W.E. Jensen and W.E. Lanyon. 2012. Eastern Meadowlark (Sturnella magna). In: A. Poole (ed.), Birds N Am Online. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York.
Johnson, L.S. 1998. House Wren (Troglodytes aedon). In: A. Poole (ed.), Birds N Am Online. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York.
Jones, S.L. and J.E. Cornely. 2002. Vesper Sparrow (Pooecetes gramineus). In: A. Poole (ed.), Birds N Am Online. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York.
Martin, S.G. and T.A. Gavin. 1995. Bobolink (Dolichonyx oryzivorus). In: A. Poole (ed.), Birds N Am Online. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York.
McGuire, S.L. 2014. Habitat use and community structure of grassland birds in southern Ontario agro-ecosystems. Master’s Thesis, Trent University, Peterborough, ON. viii +120 pp.
Miller, G.T. Jr. and D. Hackett. 2011. Living in the Environment (2ndCanadian ed.). Nelson Education Ltd., Toronto, Ontario.
Mönkkönen, M., P. Helle and K. Soppela. 1990. Numerical and behavioral responses of migrant passerines to experimental manipulation of resident tits (Parus spp.): Heterospecific attraction in northern breeding bird communities. Oecologia 85: 218–225.
Nocera, J.J. and M.G. Betts. 2010. The role of social information in avian habitat selection. Condor 112: 222–224.
Nocera, J.J., G.J. Forbes and L.-A. Giraldeau. 2006. Inadvertent social information in breeding site selection of natal dispersing birds. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B Biol. 273: 349–355.
Nocera, J.J., G.J. Forbes and L.-A. Giraldeau. 2009. Aggregations from using inadvertent social information: a form of ideal habitat selection. Ecography 32: 143–152.
Parejo, D., E. Danchin and J.M. Aviles. 2004. The heterospecific habitat copying hypothesis: can competitors indicate habitat quality? Behav. Ecol. 16: 96–105.
Pinheiro, J., D. Bates, S. DebRoy, D. Sarkar and the R Development Core Team. 2013. nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3.1–109.
Proppe, D.S. and G. Ritchison. 2008. Use and possible functions of the primary and sustained songs of male Grasshopper Sparrows. Am. Midl. Nat. 160: 1–6.
R Development Core Team. 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org/
Ray C., M. Gilpin and A.T. Smith. 1991. The effect of conspecific attraction on metapopulation dynamics. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 42: 123–134.
Roughgarden, J. 1983. Competition and theory in community ecology. Am. Nat. 122: 583–601.
Seppänen, J.-T., J.T. Forsman, M. Mönkkönen and R.L. Thomson. 2007. Social information use is a process across time, space, and ecology, reaching heterospecifics. Ecology 88: 1622–1633.
Sinclair, A.R.E. 1991. Science and the practice of wildlife management. J. Wildlife Manage. 55: 767–773.
Starkweather, J. and A.K. Moske. 2011. “Multinomial Logistic Regression.” Retrieved from: http://www.unt.edu/rss/class/Jon/ Benchmarks/MLR_JDS_Aug2011.pdf
Strong, D. Jr., L. Szyska and D. Simberloff. 1979. Tests of community-wide character displacement against null hypotheses. Evolution 33: 897–913.
Styring, A.R., R. Ragai, J. Unggang, R. Stuebing, P. Hosner and F.H. Sheldon. 2011. Bird community assembly in Bornean industrial tree plantations: Effect of forest age and structure. Forest Ecol. Manage. 261: 531–544.
Terborgh, J. 1985. Habitat selection in Amazonian birds. In: M.L. Cody (ed.), Habitat Selection in Birds. Academic Press, New York, NY. pp. 311–338.
Venables, W.N. and B.D. Ripley. 2002. Modern Applied Statistics with S (4th Edition). Springer, New York.
Vickery, P.D. 1996. Grasshopper Sparrow (Ammodramus savannarum). In: A. Poole (ed.), Birds N Am Online. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York.
Ward, M.P. and S. Schlossberg. 2004. Conspecific attraction and the conservation of territorial songbirds. Conserv. Biol. 18: 519–525.
Electronic supplementary material
About this article
Cite this article
McGuire, S.L., Nocera, J.J. Heterospecific competition and attraction in grassland bird communities differ with habitat quality. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 16, 206–214 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1556/168.2015.16.2.8
- Community ecology
- Conspecific attraction
- Grassland birds