Advertisement

Cereal Research Communications

, Volume 47, Issue 1, pp 145–156 | Cite as

Changes in Heterosis of Maize (Zea mays L.) Varietal Cross Hybrids after Four Cycles of Reciprocal Recurrent Selection

  • A. O. Kolawole
  • A. MenkirEmail author
  • E. Blay
  • K. Ofori
  • J. G. Kling
Breeding

Abstract

Two improved tropical maize composites, TZL COMP3 and TZL COMP4; representing complementary heterotic pools have been subjected to four cycles of reciprocal recurrent selection (RRS) for two decades to enhance varietal cross performance. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effect of selection on genetic gain in heterosis for grain yield and other agronomic traits of these composites. Ten parental populations representing the C0 to C4 of each composite and their crosses plus a varietal check were evaluated in a trial at eight environments in Nigeria. Grain yield of the varietal crosses increased with selection by 3.1% cycle–1. Mean grain yields of the C4 × C4 varietal cross exceeded that of a popular improved reference variety by 23%. Selection also reduced anthesis-silking interval, improved ear characteristics, phenotypic appeal and resistance to foliar diseases. Mid-parent heterosis (MPH) increased from 4% at C0 × C0 to 24% at C4 × C4. The average rate of genetic gain in heterosis for grain yield in population crosses was 3.1% possibly because of presence of non-additive gene effects. The results of our study present the potential usefulness of the advanced selection cycle as sources of diverse inbred lines with improved combining ability as well as improved varietal crosses that can be multiplied and deployed in areas with limited market access.

Keywords

genetic gain heterosis composites varietal crosses 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

42976_2019_4701145_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (153 kb)
Changes in Heterosis of Maize (Zea mays L.) Varietal Cross Hybrids after Four Cycles of Reciprocal Recurrent Selection

References

  1. Betrán, F.J., Hallauer, A.R. 1996. Hybrid improvement after reciprocal recurrent selection in BSSS and BSCB1 maize populations. Maydica 41:360–367.Google Scholar
  2. Butruille, D.V., Silva, H.D., Kaeppler, S.M., Coors, J.G. 2004. Response to selection and genetic drift in three populations derived from the golden glow maize population. Crop Sci. 44:1527–1534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carena, M.J., Hallauer, A.R. 2001. Expression of heterosis in Leaming and Midland corn belt dent populations. J. Iowa Acad. Sci. 108:73–78.Google Scholar
  4. Carena, M.J. 2005. Maize commercial hybrids compared to improved population hybrids for grain yield and agronomic performance. Euphytica 141:201–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carena, M.J., Wicks, III, Z.W. 2006. Maize population hybrids: An exploitation of U.S. temperate public genetic diversity in reserve. Maydica 51:201–208.Google Scholar
  6. Comstock, R.E., Robinson, H.F., Harvey, P.H. 1949. A breeding procedure designed to make maximum use of both general and specific combining ability. Agron. J. 41:360–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coors, J.G. 1999. Selection methodologies and heterosis. In: Coors, J.G., Pandey, S., Gerdes, J.T. (eds), Genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin. pp. 225–246.Google Scholar
  8. Eberhart, S.A. 1964. Least squares method for comparing progress among recurrent selection methods. Crop Sci. 4:230–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Edmeades, G.O., Bolanos, J., Hernadez, M., Bello, S. 1993. Recent advances in breeding for drought tolerance in maize. In: Badu-Apraku, B., Akoroda, M.O., Ouedraogo, M., Quin, F.M. (eds), Contributing to food self-sufficiency: Maize research and development in West and Central Africa. Proc. Regional Maize Workshop, 29 May – 2 June 1995, IITA, Cotonou (Besini). pp. 404–420.Google Scholar
  10. Eyherabide, G.H., Hallauer, A.R. 1991. Reciprocal full-sib recurrent selection in maize: I. Direct and indirect responses. Crop Sci. 31:952–959.Google Scholar
  11. Falconer, D.S., Mackay, T.F.C. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 4th ed., Longman Group Ltd., Edinburgh, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  12. Hallauer, A.R., Miranda, J.B. 1995. Quantitative genetics in maize breeding, 2nd ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, USA.Google Scholar
  13. Hallauer, A.R. 1999. Temperate maize and heterosis. In: Coors, J.G., Pandey, S. (eds), Genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin. pp. 353–362.Google Scholar
  14. Jenweerawat, S., Aekatasanawan, C., Laosuwan, P., Hallauer, A.R. 2010. Potential lines and hybrids developed from modified reciprocal recurrent selection in maize. Kasetsart J. (Nat. Sci.) 44:517–522.Google Scholar
  15. Keeratinijakal, V., Lamkey, K.R. 1993. Responses to reciprocal recurrent selection in BSSS and BSCB1 maize populations. Crop Sci. 33:73–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kolawole, A.O., Menkir, A., Gedil, M., Blay, E., Ofori, K., Kling, J.G. 2017. Genetic divergence in two tropical maize composites after four cycles of reciprocal recurrent selection. Plant Breeding 134:41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lamkey, K.R., Hallauer, A.R. 1987. Heritability estimated from recurrent selection experiments in maize. Maydica 32:61–78.Google Scholar
  18. Martin, J.M., Hallauer, A.R. 1980. Seven cycles of reciprocal recurrent selection in BSSS and BSCB1 maize populations. Crop Sci. 20:599–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Menkir, A., Olowolafe, M.O., Ingelbrecht, I., Fawole, I., Badu-Apraku, B., Vroh, B.I. 2006. Assessment of testcross performance and genetic diversity of yellow endosperm maize lines derived from adapted × exotic backcrosses. Theor. Appl. Genet. 113:90–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Menkir, A., Kling, J.G., Anjorin, B., Ladejobi, F., Gedil, M. 2015. Evaluating testcross performance and genetic divergence of lines derived from reciprocal tropical maize composites. Maydica 60:M14.Google Scholar
  21. Menz, M.A., Hallauer, A.R. 1997. Reciprocal recurrent selection of two tropical corn populations adapted to Iowa. Maydica 42:239–246.Google Scholar
  22. Menz, M.A., Hallauer, A.R., Russell, W.A. 1999. Comparative response of two reciprocal recurrent selection methods in BS21 and BS22 maize populations. Crop Sci. 39:89–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. MIP. 1996. Maize Improvement Program archival report, 1989–1992. Part I: Maize population improvement CID, IITA, Ibadan Nigeria.Google Scholar
  24. Moreno-Perez, E.D., Lewis-Beck, D., Cervantes-Santana, T., Torres-Flores, J.I. 2004. Reciprocal recurrent selection in Mexican highland valleys maize populations under high and low soil nitrogen content. Agrociencia 38:305–311.Google Scholar
  25. Mosisa, W., Wende, A., Berhanu, T., Legesse, W., Dagne, W., Girum, A. 2009. Performance of variety cross hybrids of Maize (Zea Mays L.) in the Mid-Altitude and Highland transition areas of Ethiopia. East African Journal of Sciences 3:80–86.Google Scholar
  26. Ochieng, J.A.W., Kamidi, R.E. 1992. Response to eight cycles of reciprocal recurrent selection in Kitale synthetic II, Ecuador 573 and their variety cross. J. Genet. Breed. 46:315–320.Google Scholar
  27. Olaniyan, A.B. 2015. Maize: Panacea for hunger in Nigeria. Afr. J. Plant Sci. 9:155–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ordas, B., Butron, A., Alvarez, A., Revilla, P., Malvar, R.A. 2012. Comparison of two methods of reciprocal recurrent selection in maize (Zea mays L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 124:1183–1191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Paliwal, R.L. 2000. Hybrid maize breeding. In: Pliwal, R.L., Granados, G., Lafitte, H.R., Violic, A.D., Marathee, J.P. (eds.), Tropical maize improvement and production. FAO, Rome. pp. 143–160.Google Scholar
  30. Peña-Asin, J., Alvarez, A., Ordas, A., Ordas, B. 2013. Evaluation of three cycles of full-sib reciprocal recurrent selection in two maize populations from the Northeast of Spain. Euphytica 191:301–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Reis, M.C.D., Guedes, F.L., Abreu, G.B., de Souza, J.C. 2013. Reciprocal recurrent selection in maize enhances heterosis and ears yield. Euphytica 191:217–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reis, M.C.D., Pádua, J.M.V., Abreu, G.B., Guedes, F.L., Balbi, R.V., de Souza, J.C. 2014. Estimates for genetic variance components in reciprocal recurrent selection in populations derived from maize single-cross hybrids. Sci. World J. Article ID 540152,  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/540152.
  33. Romay, M.C., Ordás, B., Revilla, P., Ordás, A. 2011. Three cycles of full-sib reciprocal recurrent selection in two Spanish maize populations. Crop Sci. 51:1016–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Santos, M.F., Cậmara, T.M.M., Moro, G.V., Costa, E.F.N., De Souza Jr, C.L. 2007. Responses to selection and changes in combining ability after three cycles of a modified reciprocal recurrent selection in maize. Euphytica 157:185–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. SAS Institute, 2010. Statistical Analysis Software (SAS). Users guide, SAS Inst. Inc. Cary, NC.Google Scholar
  36. Singh, R.K., Chaudhary, B.D. 2006. Biometrical methods in quantitative genetic analysis. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
  37. Souza Jr, C.L. 1999. Recurrent selection and heterosis. In: Coors, J.G., Pandey, S., Gerdes, J.T. (eds), Genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin. pp. 247–255.Google Scholar
  38. Souza Jr, C.L., Pinto, R.M.C. 2000. Responses to a short-term reciprocal recurrent selection procedure in maize. Maydica 45:21–28.Google Scholar
  39. Souza Jr, C.L., Sanzio, C.L.B., Gustavo, V.M. 2010. Performance of maize single-crosses developed from populations improved by a modified reciprocal recurrent selection. Sci. Agr. 67:198–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. O. Kolawole
    • 1
  • A. Menkir
    • 2
    Email author
  • E. Blay
    • 3
  • K. Ofori
    • 3
  • J. G. Kling
    • 4
  1. 1.Ladoke Akintola University of TechnologyOgbomosoNigeria
  2. 2.International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA)IbadanNigeria
  3. 3.West Africa Centre for Crop Improvement (WACCI)University of GhanaLegonGhana
  4. 4.Department of Crop and Soil Science, College of Agricultural SciencesOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations