Ammonium Uptake and Assimilation are Required for Rice Defense against Sheath Blight Disease
Nitrogen (N) is an important nutrient for plant growth and yield production, and rice grown in paddy soil mainly uses ammonium (NH4+) as its N source. Previous studies have shown that N status is tightly connected to plant defense; however, the roles of NH4+ uptake and assimilation in rice sheath blight disease response have not been studied previously. Here, we analyzed the effects of different N sources on plant defense against Rhizoctonia solani. The results indicated that rice plants grown in N-free conditions had higher resistance to sheath blight than those grown under N conditions. In greater detail, rice plants cultured with glutamine as the sole N source were more susceptible to sheath blight disease compared to the groups using NH4+ and nitrate (NO3–) as sole N sources. N deficiency severely inhibited plant growth; therefore, ammonium transporter 1;2 overexpressors (AMT1;2 OXs) were generated to test their growth and defense ability under low N conditions. AMT1;2 OXs increased N use efficiency and exhibited less susceptible symptoms to R. solani and highly induced the expression of PBZ1 compared to the wild-type controls upon infection of R. solani. Furthermore, the glutamine synthetase 1;1 (GS1;1) mutant (gs1;1) was more susceptible to R. solani infection than the wild-type control, and the genetic combination of AMT1;2 OX and gs1;1 revealed that AMT1;2 OX was less susceptible to R. solani and required GS1;1 activity. In addition, cellular NH4+ content was higher in AMT1;2 OX and gs1;1 plants, indicating that NH4+ was not directly controlling plant defense. In conclusion, the present study showed that the activation of NH4+ uptake and assimilation were required for rice resistance against sheath blight disease.
KeywordsAMT assimilation sheath blight defense GS1;1 rice
- R. solani
open reading frame
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- An, S., Park, S., Jeong, D.H., Lee, D.Y., Kang, H.G., Yu, J.H., Hur, J., Kim, S.R., Kim, Y.H., Lee, M., Han, S., Kim, S.J., Yang, J., Kim, E., Wi, S.J., Chung, H.S., Hong, J.P., Choe, V., Lee, H.K., Choi, J.H., Nam, J., Kim, S.R., Park, P.B., Park, K.Y., Kim, W.T., Choe, S., Lee, C.B., An, G. 2003. Generation and analysis of end sequence database for T-DNA tagging lines in rice. Plant Physiol. 133:2040–2047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bloom, A.J. 1997. Nitrogen as a limiting factor: Crop acquisition of ammonium and nitrate. Ecology in Agriculture. 145–172.Google Scholar
- Fukumorita, T., Chino, M. 1982. Sugar, amino acid and inorganic contents in rice phloem sap. Plant Cell Physiol. 23:273–283.Google Scholar
- Koegel, S., Ait Lahmidi, N., Arnould, C., Chatagnier, O., Walder, F., Ineichen, K., Boller, T., Wipf, D., Wiemken, A., Courty, P.E. 2013. The family of ammonium transporters (AMT) in Sorghum bicolor: two AMT members are induced locally, but not systemically in roots colonized by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol. 198:853–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Noctor, G., Foyer, C.H. 1998. A re-evaluation of the ATP: NADPH budget during C3 photosynthesis: a contribution from nitrate assimilation and its associated respiratory activity? J. Exp. Bot. 49:1895–1908.Google Scholar
- Patterson, K., Cakmak, T., Cooper, A., Lager, I., Rasmusson, A.G., Escobar, M.A. 2010. Distinct signalling pathways and transcriptome response signatures differentiate ammonium and nitrate supplied plants. Plant Cell Eviron. 33:1486–1501.Google Scholar
- Savary, S., Willocquet, L., Elazegui, F.A., Castilla, N.P., Teng, P.S. 2000. Rice pest constraints in tropical Asia: quantification of yield losses due to rice pests in a range of production situations. Plant Dis. 84.Google Scholar
- Ward, J.L., Forcat, S., Beckmann, M., Bennett, M., Miller, S.J., Baker, J.M., Hawkins, N.D., Vermeer, C.P., Lu, C., Lin, W., Truman, W.M., Beale, M.H., Draper, J., Mansfield, J.W., Grant, M. 2010. The metabolic transition during disease following infection of Arabidopsis thaliana by Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato. Plant J. 63:443–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar